TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
At almost 60, I started playing bass at a time (late 70's) when only very traditional jazz and orchestral players were, for the most part, interested in the double bass. I took violin lessons when I was a kid, so fretless intonation doesn't scare me, but I've always been happy enough to play a fretted bass guitar.
Nowadays the upright is a lot more in demand. I played a show last night with several bands and was the only electric bassist in the bunch. I'm torn. I watched a woman struggling to get through the crowd with her enormous bass after I tore down my stuff. Did NOT look like something I have any interest in doing. I'm kind of old-fashioned in the sense that I think if my BG is played right, most people won't really care if the tone isn't the same, even in most situations where an upright might be typically employed.
But there are a lot of "Americana" and small jazz groups springing up around here, and mostly they want that sense of "authenticity" which, I could argue, is bunk in the case of Americana unless you're playing a homemade instrument. Bear in mind that my family hails from West Virginia and my granddaddy whittled his own fiddle from a piece of wood. So I'm not trying to be snobby here; nobody doing that back in his day could afford a decent instrument and the whole handcrafted, folksy nature of the music is part of its charm.
So I'm trying to sort out if I should actually take the plunge, get an instrument, and take some lessons. There's a guy here who's getting up in years and he's willing to teach me; might be a good lead on work, if I do that, since he's got a lot of connections. But I'm getting up in years, too, and I'll need to brush up a lot on my sight reading, as well. Wondering if it's worth the time it will take to achieve the level of competence I'll need in order to feel comfortable seeking work.
What say you all?
At almost 60, I started playing bass at a time (late 70's) when only very traditional jazz and orchestral players were, for the most part, interested in the double bass. I took violin lessons when I was a kid, so fretless intonation doesn't scare me, but I've always been happy enough to play a fretted bass guitar.
Nowadays the upright is a lot more in demand. I played a show last night with several bands and was the only electric bassist in the bunch. I'm torn. I watched a woman struggling to get through the crowd with her enormous bass after I tore down my stuff. Did NOT look like something I have any interest in doing. I'm kind of old-fashioned in the sense that I think if my BG is played right, most people won't really care if the tone isn't the same, even in most situations where an upright might be typically employed.
But there are a lot of "Americana" and small jazz groups springing up around here, and mostly they want that sense of "authenticity" which, I could argue, is bunk in the case of Americana unless you're playing a homemade instrument. Bear in mind that my family hails from West Virginia and my granddaddy whittled his own fiddle from a piece of wood. So I'm not trying to be snobby here; nobody doing that back in his day could afford a decent instrument and the whole handcrafted, folksy nature of the music is part of its charm.
So I'm trying to sort out if I should actually take the plunge, get an instrument, and take some lessons. There's a guy here who's getting up in years and he's willing to teach me; might be a good lead on work, if I do that, since he's got a lot of connections. But I'm getting up in years, too, and I'll need to brush up a lot on my sight reading, as well. Wondering if it's worth the time it will take to achieve the level of competence I'll need in order to feel comfortable seeking work.
What say you all?
I think if you want to play an upright bass that is what you should do.
However, if you just want to fit the Americana vibe, I will second the notion that a UBass is a good option. I think you get close to the right tone and I think the look fits well with Americana as well.
At age 54, I'm re-learning cello to see if I can play jazz on it. There is no demand for jazz cellists, but it's just an interesting challenge.
IMHO the UBass does produce a nice sound. In my experience, audience members are often extremely unsophisticated when it comes to sound, and they tend to respond more strongly to visual cues. So, the UBass will sound fine, but it won't create the same effect with the audience. Then again some audience members will be totally mesmerized because the UBass is so tiny...so maybe the distinction is not that big of a deal.
When I was in high school I played in the jazz band without an amp. A bass guitarist played at the same time with an amp. I learned a lot as he was older and knew more about music. When we went to competition, people came up to me who had come to the event specifically to see a string bass in a big band. It didn't matter that they couldn't hear me, just seeing the string bass was cool enough.This is my thought, as well, and it's not just audiences. People want to see that big bass fiddle up there. The sound is probably not as important at this moment in time as the visual. I know that I can get an acceptable sound from my BG, but it *looks* out of place in that context.
What has been "the right preamp" for you?
Do gigging bassists really spend $5000 and up for their instruments? I've always wondered this. I used to keep fairly busy free-lancing on electric bass, but I did lose some gigs and get some attitude from musicians over my stubborn refusal to play the upright. I had several reasons for my decision, one of which was that I couldn't rationalize spending four or five figures on an instrument on which to play gigs that usually paid $30-100 or so. Still, if I had it to do over again, I might suck it up, buy a bass with a carved top and plywood sides and back, and fake my way through gigs. Snobbery is a tough thing to try to resist....An even marginally playable good sounding upright would cost somewhere in the 5 to 10K range...
It's worth noting that, I believe, LaFaro used gut strings, which probably helped alleviate the physical strain on his hands somewhat, although it probably limited his volume....I even pointed out that someone like Scott LaFaro was playing with Bill Evans and was on several recordings, yet he didn't have decades of work with it, as LaFaro died at 25 in a car crash...
On the jazz gigs I used to play, there is no way that musicians would have accepted a uke bass as a substitute for an upright bass. And frankly, I don't agree at all that it sounds like an upright. I own a uke bass, and about the best I can say for it is that if it's played in a band and its volume is turned low enough, you can't really tell what kind of bass it is. But turn it up, or play it solo, and there is no mistaking it for an upright.IMHO the UBass does produce a nice sound. In my experience, audience members are often extremely unsophisticated when it comes to sound, and they tend to respond more strongly to visual cues. So, the UBass will sound fine, but it won't create the same effect with the audience. Then again some audience members will be totally mesmerized because the UBass is so tiny...so maybe the distinction is not that big of a deal.