I haven't heard about the reliability problems of the UL502, and a search here on talkbass really doesn't yeild anything about it. Could you point me in the right direction on this one?
Yes, I agree with your assessment of the UL502, warm yet crisp, punchy, and full. But you are right, this amp has its tone, and the eq is very subtle. I don't really use the channel switching, but it is nice to have it, and I don't use the scoop button. However, the UL502 has a lot of features, and if I should ever want to use them in the future, there they are. The UL502 is almost like a swiss army knife to that effect. Most of the time you just use the knife blade, and sometimes the scissors. But if you need one of the other tools on it in the future, well, there it is.
DI issues right at the start.... seems totally fixed now, but was enough to move me away initially. I was more reacting to the 'reliability post' above. There really don't seem to be enough of these out there to really gauge the reliability issue one way or the other. Very few posts on these in general. That's one of the reasons we all focused on the 502 so much in a recent shootout. It was one of the few heads that I've never seen, heard, nor played. Again, it's very nice.
K

