• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Mesa Boogie Walkabout Mega-thread Part 10

as I mentioned, my NV610 is up for sale as I just pull out a Berg "CN312" stack when I need big stage volume these days.
I got it originally to get the most mileage I could out of my Walkabout a few years back, and that combination sounded great for sure.
But its a lot of cab to haul around all the time, and when I was using it regularly, the band I was in at the time had a road crew that moved it for me.

I'll have to put the WD800 on top of the NV610 and give it a listen before I see the cab off.
Please do! For me the NV610 is still the one constant in my rig (for nearly 15 years now). It is easier for me to move around than cabs I have to pick up, and always enough cab for anywhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rodl2005
ok, I got my NV610 unpacked today and put the WD800 on top for a run through.
Keep in mind that I have been working closely with the WD for the past few weeks, trying to make it sound as much like my WA as possible and I am very satisfied with that effort. WD does NOT sound entirely like the WA, it definitely has its own voice, but still they are very close (IMO/ to my ears).

So ... I can say without hesitation that the WD800 sounds great with the NV610 (I guess, no big surprise). I feel like the WD actually sounds a bit better thru the NV610 than the Walkabout .. perhaps its just a bit better wattage match (NV610 is rated at 750w).

For reference, my set up is:
Bass (Lull M4V or Roscoe Beck IV) => EBS Multicomp (Multi band mode, light compression, unity gain) => VT Deluxe (clean B15 settings) => Amp/Cab.

Sound is huge (to be expected) and tight. The NV610 seems to show the effect of the WD's Damping control a bit more than my CN (ported) cabs do. The WD stayed clearer, cleaner than the WA (of course, with more clean power on tap) and so the cab sounded better to my ears. The WA drives the NV610 just fine, but in louder situations (where the that much cab is used more often) it would also get woolier than the WD (again .. all that additional clean headroom/power coming into play).

I liked the sound of the WD+NV610 so much, that I believe I will take my NV610 off the TB classifieds. I was thinking about going with an NV212 for a smaller footprint, but now ... not so much :laugh:
 
Last edited:
ok, I got my NV610 unpacked today and put the WD800 on top for a run through.
Keep in mind that I have been working closely with the WD for the past few weeks, trying to make it sound as much like my WA as possible and I am very satisfied with that effort. WD does NOT sound entirely like the WA, it definitely has its own voice, but still they are very close (IMO/ to my ears).

So ... I can say without hesitation that the WD800 sounds great with the NV610 (I guess, no big surprise). I feel like the WD actually sounds a bit better thru the NV610 than the Walkabout .. perhaps its just a bit better wattage match (NV610 is rated at 750w).

For reference, my set up is:
Bass (Lull M4V or Roscoe Beck IV) => EBS Multicomp (Multi band mode, light compression, unity gain) => VT Deluxe (clean B15 settings) => Amp/Cab.

Sound is huge (to be expected) and tight. The NV610 seems to show the effect of the WD's Damping control a bit more than my CN (ported) cabs do. The WD stayed clearer, cleaner than the WA (of course, with more clean power on tap) and so the cab sounded better to my ears. The WA drives the NV610 just fine, but in louder situations (where the that much cab is used more often) it would also get woolier than the WD (again .. all that additional clean headroom/power coming into play).

I liked the sound of the WD+NV610 so much, that I believe I will take my NV610 off the TB classifieds. I was thinking about going with an NV212 for a smaller footprint, but now ... not so much :laugh:
Thanks for the review! Color me tempted for sure. Granted I feel like for my tastes the NV610 molds most amps more towards what I want to hear (tighter down low and without any harshness up top, loads of midrange articulation and character). The Walkabout through the NV610 always sounds great to me, just tends towards too much uncontrollable compression at rocking volumes for me (not unlike a low-wattage tube head). I am a bit worried though because the tone of the Walkabout at that point was the best for me, and I am guessing the WD-800 will have alot less inherent harmonic distortion going on at similar volumes. I do have pedals that will probably make up the difference well enough though. I will need to audition one!
 
The NV610 seems to show the effect of the WD's Damping control a bit more than my CN (ported) cabs do.
For some reason I find the damping control to have a more obvious effect with a sealed cab than a ported one (my AK cab sealed or open is clearly different). I'm sure there is a speaker designer rocket science kind of reason for that, but I've found the same thing.

OBTW, that NV610 is a sweet cab when you have a head with some power to bring it to life. I've been tempted on several occasions to buy one and I'm not even a sealed cab guy. :)
 
For some reason I find the damping control to have a more obvious effect with a sealed cab than a ported one (my AK cab sealed or open is clearly different). I'm sure there is a speaker designer rocket science kind of reason for that, but I've found the same thing.

OBTW, that NV610 is a sweet cab when you have a head with some power to bring it to life. I've been tempted on several occasions to buy one and I'm not even a sealed cab guy. :)
The NV610 works great with literally every head I've owned- from a vintage 50 watt Bassman to an Aguilar DB750 (I think the most pounding head I ever ran through it)! My main head right now is a Mesa Prodigy generally run at half power (125 watts) and those two complement each-other perfectly. The tighter voicing of the Prodigy gives the impression of more headroom than the Walkabout too when at full power, while at half power the useable volume feels about the same with the Prodigy feeling more controllable to me (it feels tighter down low when pushed, where the Walkabout starts to loosen up unless you hit it with a pretty strong high-pass before it).
 
Hello from Belgium
I am the new happy owner of a Walkabout Scout 12 (second hand, silver front panel, active/passive switch).
During my first rehearsal (first time at high volume), I have had the same problem as other owners : the volume faded twice a few seconds and then it was fine for the last hour... I have now plugged a patch cable in the fx loop and the switch is now on "bypass". As a preventative measure, I have also changed the tubes for fresh new ones (from TubeAmpDoctor in Germany). I tried it at home at low volume (because of wife and neighbors...) and the problem didn't come back. I don't have the possibility to test it at high volume now and I wonder if the problem is fixed.

Question : is the problem linked with the volume level ?
 
Yes, the controls use the same bushing type as the WAs, tight and mildly damped. The knobs are of course different and are similar to the Carbines and some of the guitar amps.

My post was meant as comic relief after a very long night. The "Knob Feel" guy on Youtube has some hilarious (and sometimes slightly creepy) responses as he, uhhh, fondles knobs on various amps. Mostly hi fi stuff.
 
Is $400 good price for one of these used?
I would say so depending on age and condition. I haven’t checked the market for awhile, but remember silver-face ones usually selling for between $325-$450ish, generally on the cheaper side for the early red screenprinted ones without updated active/passive switch or FX-loop switch (the later silver ones had black screen printing). The newer all-black models probably still go for a bit more. Occasionally I would see 12” Scout combos for not much more than a head by itself.
 
I would say so depending on age and condition. I haven’t checked the market for awhile, but remember silver-face ones usually selling for between $325-$450ish, generally on the cheaper side for the early red screenprinted ones without updated active/passive switch or FX-loop switch (the later silver ones had black screen printing). The newer all-black models probably still go for a bit more. Occasionally I would see 12” Scout combos for not much more than a head by itself.
This was silverface and had an active-passive switch. I think it's identical to this one, which is priced quite a bit higher.

Mesa Boogie Walkabout Compact Bass Head
 
@agedhorse or anyone else...... are their differences between the generations of WA's in regards to 6 vs 8 mosfets? Thanks!
Not so much with the MOSFETs, the change in number was related to going from single due to double die parts.
 
I would say so depending on age and condition. I haven’t checked the market for awhile, but remember silver-face ones usually selling for between $325-$450ish, generally on the cheaper side for the early red screenprinted ones without updated active/passive switch or FX-loop switch (the later silver ones had black screen printing). The newer all-black models probably still go for a bit more. Occasionally I would see 12” Scout combos for not much more than a head by itself.

I would have to agree.... I just spent $750 for one made in 2016 with all the updates and with the mesa headcase. I was more inclined to pay extra because it still has 3 years left on the warranty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sunbeast