• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Music Man StingRay Club | PART FIVE

Hi. Do you find EB's setup specs a little bit too vague? Maybe a little bit confusing too?

- How much is a "business card"?
- In order to follow the fingerboard radius, you should set ALL the strings at the same exact action. So why they talk about bass side and treble side? Even Fender does that, I never understood why.
I also must say that adjusting the truss rod using their method results in a VERY bowed (concave) neck. The relief is just too much for my taste.
- What does it mean "Adjust the bass side of the pickup to be parallel with the pickguard"? No bass side/treble seide measurement this time?
6/32" (almost 5 millimeters) for the G string is too much, ime. My pickup doesn't catch almost anything if set like that.
Plus, some new pickups (StingRay Special for example) should be set at the same height for both bass and treble side because they are already balanced. Doing ehat they suggest results in a too loud G string.

I tried to setup my Stingray like I do with my Fenders and is seems much better to me. What do you guys think? And what do you guys do?

I tend to ignore suggested setup measurements and just set things up to my liking based on how I play the instrument. I tend to enjoy a bit more relief than probably the average player and I dig in quite a bit too so I have to adjust for that.
 
I tend to ignore suggested setup measurements and just set things up to my liking based on how I play the instrument. I tend to enjoy a bit more relief than probably the average player and I dig in quite a bit too so I have to adjust for that.
That's one thing that makes a good bass player, knowing his own setup for his own style.
 
I tend to ignore suggested setup measurements and just set things up to my liking based on how I play the instrument. I tend to enjoy a bit more relief than probably the average player and I dig in quite a bit too so I have to adjust for that.
I've found my personal ideal setup with my Fenders, starting from the suggested settings and adjusting from there.
My StingRay has been setup like a Fender, I used that method and tweaked things based on my playing style, so it plays good. I was just curious to try their suggested settings and realized how much vague they are.

That's one thing that makes a good bass player, knowing his own setup for his own style.
As much as I agree, you should start from a basic guide and understand how a specific instrument works. All basses are different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GregC and sdlstn
Could you tell me why this one has 5-string pickup on it and why it is called "Old Smoothie"?
As far as I know, old MM models didn't have pickup like that?
What is so special about that one?
What is the difference in tone?
Screenshot-2020-09-25-at-11-37-11.png



Also, the pickup cover looks cheap.
Doesn't fit?
For that price it should be perfect.
Screenshot-2020-09-25-at-11-37-40.png
 
Could you tell me why this one has 5-string pickup on it and why it is called "Old Smoothie"?
As far as I know, old MM models didn't have pickup like that?
What is so special about that one?
What is the difference in tone?
View attachment 3995956


Also, the pickup cover looks cheap.
Doesn't fit?
For that price it should be perfect.
View attachment 3995957
It's a tribute to prototype No 26, which Leo Fender built for Sterling Ball to test.

Old Smoothie | Basses | Ernie Ball Music Man
 
Thanks!
What 10 magnets give you instead of 8?

I believe the idea to have the magnets on either side of the strings instead of directly under the strings was so that it would be less aggressive sounding and more "smooth". The pickup cover is like that because that is how Leo Fender did it for the prototype. They weren't manufacturing pickup covers for a 10 pole cover so he cut 2 of them and taped them together.
 
I felt in love!

107-01-50-01.png

I have all natural StingRay 3 band EQ from 2000.
I always wanted black one with rosewood fingerboard.
I am considering buying this Music Man Stingray 4 Special Jet Black.
Or should I search for 90's-2000's one?
Does this new Special look different [black hardware] only or there are tone differences also?
I cannot test any Music Man because in my country it is hard to get them.
I will probably order from Germany.
 
About 10 years ago I bought 5-string 1992 StingRay. Sold it 2 years later because of sliding off G string.
Does the G string slides off in the new 5-string MM?
I've had a similar problem with my Stingray Special but I realized it's not caused by the bass itself, at least not directly. There's plenty of space for the G string to move, definitely not less compared to my other basses. Low tension strings and improper technique can cause the G string to slip off. I simply adapted and it doesn't happen anymore.
 
I felt in love!

View attachment 3996064
I have all natural StingRay 3 band EQ from 2000.
I always wanted black one with rosewood fingerboard.
I am considering buying this Music Man Stingray 4 Special Jet Black.
Or should I search for 90's-2000's one?
Does this new Special look different [black hardware] only or there are tone differences also?
I cannot test any Music Man because in my country it is hard to get them.
I will probably order from Germany.

That's an ebony fretboard, not rosewood actually. It would likely sound a little different compared to a non-special Stingray since the newer ones have an 18v preamp which is voiced a little differently.
 
About 10 years ago I bought 5-string 1992 StingRay. Sold it 2 years later because of sliding off G string.
Does the G string slides off in the new 5-string MM?

I haven't had that problem with my 2019 SR5 Neck-Through. But it's probably an issue of either the bridge being positioned wrongly on that particular bass, or your technique, since this doesn't seem to be a common complaint (at least, I don't recall hearing it before).