As I stated earlier ...
Our vicarious interest in the outcome doesn't play any significant role in any final decision. Frankly, it isn't important to me what happens, since I have no direct involvement. My earlier comments were simply a suggestion based on many years of resolving conflicts through administrative review ...
Ed, from all I know about you, you are one cool guy. And it pains me
to disagree with you, but I am with baba on this.
Actually, none of that will ever happen. BMW will never provide
any info to anyone to resolve anything IMO based on what he
has already stated in this thread. I have yet to see anything
to the contrary. When JuniorK brought the last thread up,
it resulted in a number of
ad hominem attacks on posters
asking for clarification of the use of the funds. And resulted in
a temp TOS ban for some involved.
All I can say is that people on the board should be aware of
the specifics and facts about what was done and what
happened. The money is spent and gone and will neither be
returned, nor forwarded to where it was reperesented to be
going. And its never going to get accounted for, since suspect
that since it was co-mingled with personal funds. BMW has given
me no reason to think otherwise since he has never said where it
was spent.
But like I said, let it be a matter of public record. I, like Jive1,
think it is a serious enough issue that the solicitor should
resolve it (the accounting issue). I know I would, as I value
my reputation on this board.