Bryan R. Tyler said:That one looks very familiar...I think it belongs/belonged to a TBer.
Yeah, I have seen that on this site as well. The bass doesn't look too bad from the pics.
Shawn
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Bryan R. Tyler said:That one looks very familiar...I think it belongs/belonged to a TBer.
4string4ever said:Ok, so I ordered a DP Custom in December 2003. Took almost a year and a half, and the original quote was between 36 and 40 weeks. I send my own design and requested a spalted figured maple for the top, with layers of purple heart, maple, and ash in the center. When I finally got the bass, I was quite dismayed to find first of all that the poly finish I requested was horribly uneven and blotchy, to which Dave replied "That's how it comes out on that particular wood". Knowing that, I think he should have cautioned me beforehand and suggested against the poly, or to use a different topwood. Also, the layers in the body were of quite different thicknesses around the perimeter of the body, like they were sanded to heavily in some spots. The wings were crooked against the neck through, the headstock was lopsided (it was supposed to be an arrowhead shape), the holes for the tuning keys weren't the same distances from the edge of the headstock by a large margin, and the middle piece of the 3 piece neck was not centered. Over all, a quite crappy piece of work.
I sent it back insisting on a redo, which he did. I offered to allow him to use his own designs, and to go without the body lams, all in order to have a better chance of a quality build.
A couple of months later, the bass arrives. Using the same nut from the original that was 1 9/16" wide, the friggin' neck was 1 3/4" wide with filler in the gaps!! I couldn't believe it!!
He had the bass picked up to fix this, and then when it arrived for the third time, I discovered that there now is more bend in the neck on the low side than on the high side. The low side shows some relief and the high side is straight. The more relief I apply, the worse it looks. He says it is fine, and will actually be better for the intonation and resonance of the lower register.
I have been dismayed by the negativity I've seen here about Dave since he's been a pretty standup guy thusfar, but I can no longer stand idly by. He now refuses do do any further work on my bass. I have contacted the BBB, and will also contact legal counsel if necessary.
A note to anyone considering purchasing a DP Custom;
DON'T DO IT!!!!!!!!!!
DZ said:I think one of th big issues is possibly Dave's idea of "Perfect" and the consumers idea of "perfect" ar etwo different things...
marcusalan said:[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Is it just me, or are the ferrules not lined up symmetrically?
I have no axe to grind with DP, and I'm not looking to further fan the firestorm surrounding these basses, but this is the kind of thing that drives me crazy with DP, Wish and several other builders :scowl:marcusalan said:[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Is it just me, or are the ferrules not lined up symmetrically?
.... and that's the thing that drives me nutsfunkycarnivore said:The matching control cavity cover looks pretty good though.
lamborghini98 said:I knew someone was going to mention this the second I saw it. Again, this is a point that a lot of us here care about, but I have a feeling that the vast majority of Dave's other customers dont care that much. I care a little... but in the long run Im sure I wont care. Im not buying a boutique bass.
lamborghini98 said:I knew someone was going to mention this the second I saw it. Again, this is a point that a lot of us here care about, but I have a feeling that the vast majority of Dave's other customers dont care that much. I care a little... but in the long run Im sure I wont care.
Im not buying a boutique bass.
pointbass said:.... and that's the thing that drives me nutsIt's gotta be a lot more difficult to match that plate than it is to drill a straight hole ..... I just don't understand
![]()
The drill bit caught a hard spot in the body and walked halfway acros the back making a real mess before I got it under control. 
JDGA fan said:The matching control cavity cover might be a nice idea, but why then drill the hole for the string ferrule so that is on the edge of the cover and at the edge of a laminate for the neck and body wing. Could this be a problem in the future?
Even worse, if it's the case: If he copied the Pedulla design, then the cover is at least 1/2" thick, which would leave at least 1/2" of ferrule depth, nearly halfway around, hanging in space.Geoff St. Germaine said:This is what I noticed before noticing how poorly the holes were aligned. It just seems like a horrible design flaw that the string ferrule and cavity cover would share the same space. I don't know how thick the cover is, but given that it is made of wood I would wager that it is on the order of .25" thick (unless it is laminated to a piece of brass or something). Having the ferrule only occupy half of a hole is a strange mounting method.
pilotjones said:Even worse, if it's the case: If he copied the Pedulla design, then the cover is at least 1/2" thick, which would leave at least 1/2" of ferrule depth, nearly halfway around, hanging in space.
And either way, I can imagine some funky interfacing between the cover and the flange of the ferrule, when removing the cover.