• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Nash or Fender P-Bass?

I'm in the market for a good P-Bass and I think I've narrowed it down to one of the two:
- Nash PB-63 (version of P-Bass) for $2k
OR
- Fender MIA P-Bass "Professional II" $1,550

They are pretty close in price so not a concern for me.
Which one would be a better P-bass?
 
Thanks guys for the suggestions! I have to admit, I really love the looks of the Nash too.
My only concern is the 3 tone sunburst is in Ash and I "think" I want alder.
I started another thread asking about the difference between ash and alder with respect to tone.
It seems like the consensus is it would not result in a discernable difference in tone.
If that's so, then my choice is easy. Thoughts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: aproud1
Thanks guys for the suggestions! I have to admit, I really love the looks of the Nash too.
My only concern is the 3 tone sunburst is in Ash and I "think" I want alder.
I started another thread asking about the difference between ash and alder with respect to tone.
It seems like the consensus is it would not result in a discernable difference in tone.
If that's so, then my choice is easy. Thoughts?
I'll play an alder bass but I'd choose an ash one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bassplayerwanab
Thanks for the feedback. How well do you think ash sits in a mix vs alder for ballads, pop-rock, etc? I consistently hear alder is warmer and rounder and sits better in a mix and that ash has a slightly brighter tone.

I personally think that an ash P bass seems to have more snap. Not sure how else to describe it. Sounded great solo but sounded perfect with a group. I played one for several years with a variety of bands and it fit perfectly in the mix. I tired several P basses and finally found the ash seemed to have that. If it seems too bright, cut the tone knob a bit. You should probably throw some Pyramid or LaBella 760fl's on there any way.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bassplayerwanab
Thanks for the feedback. How well do you think ash sits in a mix vs alder for ballads, pop-rock, etc? I consistently hear alder is warmer and rounder and sits better in a mix and that ash has a slightly brighter tone.
That's definitely open to interpretation.
I'm hoping to bring my ash and adler L2000s to the studio soon...hopefully I can get the sound guy's opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bassplayerwanab
A Fender American Original 60s P bass may be a better comparison for that Nash bass than a Pro ii.

Agreed. The Nash is built to imitate a vintage instrument, the American Pro II is a modern P bass with string through body, carbon fiber neck rods, modern bridge, poly finish instead of nitro etc. The American Original's are going to be a lot closer in comparison.
 
Quite a few Nash haters out there who say it's a parts bass. OK, I guess.
So maybe 4-5 different craftsman work in different shops to build a Nash.
And with a Fender 4-5 different "craftsman" work in one shop to build a bass... which is of course not true for all Fenders.

If you want a bass built from the ground up by one guy, then order a CS bass, or a Muckelroy or whatever... you're gonna pay for that.

Nash does a fantastic job with the last (very important steps) in the process and puts out a very nice instrument.
 
Nash now - for a while they were just doing relic’d bitsa’s that were overpriced (still very decent) - now I think they are making stuff in house to a good quality and can justify the price IMHO (happy to be corrected if I am wrong on any of that)
Plus Glen Hughes uses Nash - and he is a legend - seen him play both a jazz and a P and they sang
 

Latest posts