A lot of fans are quick to label a transferring player as a quitter or soft or a baby. We do not know what actually happens behind closed doors to initiate the move. If you've paid attention over the last 30 years, specifically with SEC, you'll know that players are encouraged to leave when the next shiny recruit comes along. It used to be called "processed out". It happened in other conferences too, but not like the SEC. And yes, now that players can make that decision for themselves without having to go to junior college, this appears to be happening more and more. And all I hear from older fans is how these kids quit.
Or consider coaches leaving for a new school before the contract is up. Are they the cry baby because they leave before the terms of the contract are up? Or are they a really smart person leveraging existing contracts and buyouts to maximize their earnings? But when a player does the same, they are cry babies.
I'll posit this. Who here has worked for a company they felt were a great fit for themselves? Then, 2 years in, a new person gets the open position above you. Do you buckle down and work really hard to compete for the next opening? Or do you brush up your resume and sell yourself to the next company? I would venture to guess the vast majority would look elsewhere. That is decidedly the best way to increase your salary and get promotions. And that is okay. It is okay in the business world. It is okay in the trades. It is okay in music. But as soon as we start talking about college athletics, all of a sudden, players having agency to choose is bad.