It is indeed.
I'm a Texas Tech fan from my time working there and have followed Leach's career since. He was quite the character for sure and a great coach. He was really screwed over by TTU, IMO.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
NCAA Football 2022
- Thread starter Gaolee
- Start date
It is indeed.
I'm a Texas Tech fan from my time working there and have followed Leach's career since. He was quite the character for sure and a great coach. He was really screwed over by TTU, IMO.
Bowl season has started. In 10 years, this will be the first game in the 64-team college football playoffs.
Miami (OH) vs. UAB - College Football Live Game - December 16, 2022 | ESPN
Miami (OH) vs. UAB - College Football Live Game - December 16, 2022 | ESPN
Nice one Napier. You couldn't even get your team to show up against a hippy college from the woods of Oregon.
-Mike
-Mike
A couple of things....
First, Mike Leach was brilliant, cranky, whimsical, endlessly talkative, and everyone at WSU is grateful to him for putting us back on the football map after a few years of utter futility. I'm sure the folks at Tech and MS State share that feeling. Wherever he went, the team immediately became a factor in its conference. His coaching tree will go on; in fact, the coaches at two of the three universities I've worked at have backgrounds in the Air Raid. Leach was a sometimes unnoticed force that affected all of college football. R.I.P.
On a different topic....after yesterday's bowl game, I realized that the timing of the transfer portal opening is destroying the bowl season. My alma mater looked awful in a defeat yesterday, but they had lost 11 starting and backup players to transfers, and three assistant coaches had left. The team on the field bore little relationship to the one that played the season. I really hope that they change the rules and don't open the transfer portal until after the end of the bowl and championship season.
I think the effect is probably most pronounced on middle-of-the-pack teams that lose their top talent to the portal. I don't see the point of playing bowl games after the top players on a team leave; you're not seeing the team that actually played the season.
I know that those mid-pack teams have a shot at getting equally good players from top level teams that have really good backups who want a chance at starting - but they don't show up until the next year. The reduction in team quality at the season's end really reduces the attraction of bowl games. I've already heard many comments from people saying they won't bother to travel to a bowl game if the top players from the team have left for the portal, and I don't blame them.
First, Mike Leach was brilliant, cranky, whimsical, endlessly talkative, and everyone at WSU is grateful to him for putting us back on the football map after a few years of utter futility. I'm sure the folks at Tech and MS State share that feeling. Wherever he went, the team immediately became a factor in its conference. His coaching tree will go on; in fact, the coaches at two of the three universities I've worked at have backgrounds in the Air Raid. Leach was a sometimes unnoticed force that affected all of college football. R.I.P.
On a different topic....after yesterday's bowl game, I realized that the timing of the transfer portal opening is destroying the bowl season. My alma mater looked awful in a defeat yesterday, but they had lost 11 starting and backup players to transfers, and three assistant coaches had left. The team on the field bore little relationship to the one that played the season. I really hope that they change the rules and don't open the transfer portal until after the end of the bowl and championship season.
I think the effect is probably most pronounced on middle-of-the-pack teams that lose their top talent to the portal. I don't see the point of playing bowl games after the top players on a team leave; you're not seeing the team that actually played the season.
I know that those mid-pack teams have a shot at getting equally good players from top level teams that have really good backups who want a chance at starting - but they don't show up until the next year. The reduction in team quality at the season's end really reduces the attraction of bowl games. I've already heard many comments from people saying they won't bother to travel to a bowl game if the top players from the team have left for the portal, and I don't blame them.
:
Washington seems to be doing OK with the transfer portal this year. They just kept a couple edge rushers who could have opted for the draft, along with their QB and a couple receivers who could have jumped. They appear to be picking up a few more players from other schools. I kinda wonder what's going on and what's up DeBoer's sleeve that is making these draft eligible kids stick around instead of going for the payday. And what's attracting recruits through the transfer portal and prep kids who are flipping their commitments. Not that I'm complaining necessarily, but it seems a bit odd.
Don't know about UM, but most of those Pitt "National Championships" are pure vaporware, taking place before there was such a thing as a national champion and awarded retroactively by a random group of people with no authority to do so.
There was a Camellia Bowl played today in Montgomery, Alabama between two 6-6 teams, but there was once an annual Camellia Bowl in Hughes Stadium, Sacramento, CA. It was a pretty big game at the time.
Camellia Bowl (1961–1980) - Wikipedia
Camellia Bowl (1961–1980) - Wikipedia
They always say that the bowl games are important because of the money the schools get for playing. But the minor and very minor bowl games like the one today has no more than one third capacity of a fairly small stadium. And the TV ratings can't be good. I'm sitting in a big sports bar and the game is on 3 or 4 out if 70 TVs. And it's on daytime on a Tuesday. And this is the norm until maybe NY eve. Where does the money come from.
Here is a list of bowl game payouts this year. (Bowl Game Payouts are Practically a Small Fortune in College Football). The lowest looks like $225K. I've read a few other articles estimating corporate sponsorships start at $500K and go way way up from there, I'm assuming commensurate with the team payouts. So you have that, and then whatever the TV networks pay and of course attendance. The networks probably aren't making much covering these lesser bowls, but I'll bet they aren't losing anything either.
Then too, the teams playing get additional money from their conferences for making a bowl appearance.
Everyone seems to be getting a nice slice of the pie with this system.
Washington did pretty well yesterday against an admittedly short-handed Texas team. Penix didn't have his best day, but the running game showed up. And Washington's usual problems against the run stayed home. Texas was missing its top two backs, but I have a hard time believing the drop off is so drastic between them and the guys who played. It wasn't what I was expecting at all.
Speaking of the Washington bowl game...
I noticed during that game, and other games over the past couple of seasons, that when a player goes out of bounds, the clock starts again before the ball is snapped. And I mean the game clock, not the play clock. What's up with that?
That's odd. I didn't see that because I didn't actually watch the game. It was only on cable, and we refuse to have cable.Speaking of the Washington bowl game...
I noticed during that game, and other games over the past couple of seasons, that when a player goes out of bounds, the clock starts again before the ball is snapped. And I mean the game clock, not the play clock. What's up with that?
Speaking of the Washington bowl game...
I noticed during that game, and other games over the past couple of seasons, that when a player goes out of bounds, the clock starts again before the ball is snapped. And I mean the game clock, not the play clock. What's up with that?
This is what I found out about it, and I can't believe it's been in place since 2008: (source:When does the clock stop and stay stopped on an out of bounds in college football? - Land-Grant Holy Land )
This is why my English wife finds football a bit confusing at times. She likes watching Seahawks games while she's doing certain chores at home, but she doesn't pay any attention to all the nuances. She will still ask why a team is punting or kicking, and going for it on 4th down still confuses her.
