TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I also prefer the top one overall.
Maybe, like you said, you could offer the bottom one as an option?
I'd say a version of your top body design with the headstock of the lower
![]()
still, if it was me, I'd shorten up the lower horn by 15% - 20% from where it is in the top image.
R
When you render or draw up the shorter horn version as mentioned, I'd try seeing how it looks with the treble-side f-hole lowered - either fully in the position from the stumpy, or at least halfway between the original position and the stumpy position.
If you're interested in that and haven't seen it yet, look up [Invalid or Expired Link Removed].Might be nice to do the same 3-D sculpting on the upper bout.
Joining the plates:
![]()
The back body plate (left) and top body plate:
![]()
Wow . . . the bass in this picture is humbling . . . well done and lots of attention to detail.