...But let me not miss John Dong's gracious response. Put me down for a pair also (I'd say I'll take the first pair, but I'm not gonna go to the factory and wait in line, only to find tombowlus camped out in his smoking jacket!)
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
macmrkt said:I'm intrigued from an audiophile standpoint about the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of a 3way bass cabinet versus a 2way.
macmrkt said:I wonder if audiophile concepts apply to a bass cabinet such as point source and the preference of a 1 way over a 2way, or a 2way over a 3way...
macmrkt said:...But let me not miss John Dong's gracious response. Put me down for a pair also (I'd say I'll take the first pair, but I'm not gonna go to the factory and wait in line, only to find tombowlus camped out in his smoking jacket!)
It goes without saying that John knows more about designing and building speaker systems, and running his own business than most or all of us. However, I should like to echo Bruce's comments about "the sound" for Double Bass, and the fact that the 8" drivers as well as the dedicated midrange drivers seem to provide the quick response and smooth clarity that so many of us are after. Again, I don't know squat about these things, but I have to wonder about "dealer reaction at trade shows" unless the dealer in question is (ALLHAIL)Bob Gollihur. I don't know of any other dealers out there who are as in tune with the specific needs of this relatively small niche of customers.EAJohn said:It seems that I get monthly request for a VL-208.
I find it a little hard to justify producing a 2x8 cabinet since our NL-210 is 4 lbs lighter than the VL-208 and is just a little larger( NL-210:22.5"H x 17"W x 15"D vs VL-208:18.5"H x 17.5"W x 13.5"D). The NL-210 moves more air and plays louder.
If EA were to produce a new 2x8 cabinet then it would have the following parameters: M-Line configuration, Neo magnet, Kevlar woofer cones, 19.0"H x 15.6"W x 12.5"D(smaller than a VL-208), projected weight should be under 30 lbs(VL-208 is 48 lbs).
I expect the 8" neo drivers should be available sometime this summer. Prototypes will be made if the driver meets our requirements. The decision to market the NM-208 will be based upon dealer reaction at the Trade shows.
T-Bal said:It goes without saying that John knows more about designing and building speaker systems, and running his own business than most or all of us. However, I should like to echo Bruce's comments about "the sound" for Double Bass, and the fact that the 8" drivers as well as the dedicated midrange drivers seem to provide the quick response and smooth clarity that so many of us are after. Again, I don't know squat about these things, but I have to wonder about "dealer reaction at trade shows" unless the dealer in question is (ALLHAIL)Bob Gollihur. I don't know of any other dealers out there who are as in tune with the specific needs of this relatively small niche of customers.
So, a couple of questions for anyone who might know:
1. What does "M-Line" refer to?
2. What are the pros and cons of a 3-way system? I was under the impression that pro = sounds better, con = more complicated and expensive to build. Is there more to it? I see tombowlus touched on this, but if he would like to elaborate or anyone else chime in. Maybe if the neo drivers have a more pronounced midrange it will eliminate the need for the 5-inchers?
tombowlus said:You know, I was thinking about this as I was getting ready for work this morning (obsessed, I know), and on the topic of simple designs versus more complicated (e.g., 3-way enclosure) designs, it is interesting to look at the Wizzy cab. From outward appearances, this cab is almost like the anti-VL-208. It is lighter than it looks, one driver (with a wizzer cone), no crossover, and 4 ohm. You'd expect this to be a totally different animal from the VL-208, but in many ways, its sound is reminiscent of the VL-208. Don't get me wrong, they do not sound like identical twins, but they do sound like at least cousins. The overall tonal balance, and tight, smooth articulate sound are certainly in the same ballpark. The VL-208 goes deeper, and also goes higher, and the Wizzy is a bit more warm on the whole, but it amazes me that so much of what I love about the VL-208 can be found in the Wizzy.
What is my point? Well, on the one hand, I guess I am recommending that people check out the Wizzy, if they haven't already (two of them with an iAMP 500/800 are stellar!). But my other thought was that for anyone who might doubt how close EA can come to the sound of a no holds barred, three-way design in a new, more simplified design, the success that they have had with the (seemingly) super simple Wizzy is certainly grounds for optimism!
Later, Tom.

Congrats! What did (will) you pay for it?macmrkt said:Thanks Mike for the tip. I think I'll be getting it - just spoke to them. They said you were there this morning. I guess I was the first to call.