Probably better and matched pieces of ash used for the body.
Makes sense. I also thought maybe cause it'll be the most in demand, so why not.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Probably better and matched pieces of ash used for the body.
The last batch had a number of units sold next to it. This batch doesn't. So maybe production bass?
Also why is the natural $100 more? That's crazy to me.
All of the EBMM short scales are ash bodies . The SBMM imports are a different story .My guess is that you need an ash body that looks like it's worth paying $3k for. .
All of the EBMM short scales are ash bodies . The SBMM imports are a different story .
Yes sir!!! I agree!!!Cool new finishes...now...time to get the 5 strings (in 32 if needed?)
So which one then!
I like the Dazzler , but I’m holding out to see if they release another Tim Cummerford short scale active . I love mine and would certainly go for another one to compliment my natural finish one. I think the short scales sound even better with the preamp.
I think so. But others might not.I have to ask. Is it really 4 time better than a Sterling Short Scale? It’s about 4 times the price.
Really to bad that they simultaneously both confused and cheapened the Sterling name by taking it from being a top quality alternative to the StingRay and making it the name of their budget line as well.I have to ask. Is it really 4 time better than a Sterling Short Scale? It’s about 4 times the price.