• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New Khan Mini DI

I loved my full-sized Khan, but there were definitely a few practical things I would have changed about it. This new model addressed everything I didn’t love about the previous version, and I couldn’t be happier with it.
Like what?

I've been eyeing the new (mini) Khan, but it seems optimized for being mounted on top of a pedalboard. That's not my use case--I mount my full-sized Khan below to give more real estate for pedals--and the orientation of the input, output, and power jacks on the mini version doesn't seem like it will work for my needs. Specifically, the fact that the power jack protrudes from a third side, rather than either the input or output sides, is unfortunate. If I want to orient the new Khan so the output jack is accessible, then I only have 5.25" to play with below my Mono Lite Plus pedalboard. And reports are the new Khan measures ~5" on its long side. With a power jack plugged in, it seems like it won't fit. Bummer. I would have loved the weight reduction.

Can someone with the new Khan provide precise measurements (including the power jack)? Scuba's initial post states it is approximately 4" x 5" and he kindly later confirmed the height is 1.7" with rubber feet and 1.54 without feet. Is that 4" x 5" exact or are the length and width in fact something a little different?
 
Last edited:
Like what?

I've been eyeing the new (mini) Khan, but it seems optimized for being mounted on top of a pedalboard. That's not my use case--I mount my full-sized Khan below to give more real estate for pedals--and the orientation of the input, output, and power jacks on the mini version doesn't seem like it will work for my needs. Specifically, the fact that the power jack protrudes from a third side, rather than either the input or output sides, is unfortunate. If I want to orient the new Khan so the output jack is accessible, then I only have 5.25" to play with below my Mono Lite Plus pedalboard. And reports are the new Khan measures ~5" on its long side. With a power jack plugged in, it seems like it won't fit. Bummer. I would have loved the weight reduction.

Can someone with the new Khan provide precise measurements (including the power jack)? Scuba's initial post states it is approximately 4" x 5" and he kindly later confirmed the height is 1.7" with rubber feet and 1.54 without feet. Is that 4" x 5" exact or are the length and width in fact something a little different?
Been using the new Khan VTDI for a few days now, and so far I’m really impressed. It sounds every bit as good as the previous version, but with a few practical upgrades that make it much easier to live with on a board.

Compared to the older VTDI, the footprint is smaller, it’s lighter, and it fits perfectly on a Pedaltrain Nano+. The I/O jack layout is also much more pedalboard-friendly.

One of the biggest wins for me is that it runs from a 9V adapter instead of an IEC power cable. I can now power the entire board from my Cioks DC7, instead of needing a second IEC cable or a splitter just for the Khan.

And on top of all that, this version is $200 cheaper than the previous one. Altogether, I think Khan really hit a home run with the new VTDI.
View attachment 7520501View attachment 7520502View attachment 7520503
The things I mentioned in this post. The new one is much more pedalboard friendly.
 
It's officially available now. You can contact Obeid through his website and order. Khan Audio
He told me he hasn't yet updated the with new images/detail but you can order.
Yep. Go get him folks. No worries with this one.
I ordered on Wednesday. The Mini made it as far as my local distribution center but won't be delivered until Monday due to the holiday. Tantalizingly close. I'm super stoked to finally get a Khan back in the arsenal. I've owned two different VTDIs and only got rid of them because they weren't as pedalboard-friendly as some other options. Loved the tone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rcmbass and Ejek
I had the old model at one time and am seriously thinking about getting the new smaller model. Thanks for the feedback.
I had the newer older model and I liked it but it wasn’t a lot more board friendly than my REDDI honestly. I didn’t mind the extra power cable but the ins and outs didn’t lay well for me. This one has addressed all those issues - even power. My DC7 has a few empty outlets yet.
 
I had the old model at one time and am seriously thinking about getting the new smaller model. Thanks for the feedback.
Of course! It’s very light as well, came with a power supply (no box??) and so far has taken pedals well. I’m probably going to be using some sort of tone shaper into it and the Tech 21 VTDI sounds great before the tube goodness
 
  • Like
Reactions: CamJazzBass


Here's a quick test run; my Yamaha BB435 Lollar Precision bass pickup into either the Khan or the Mantle (set flat not the settings in the photo)> Avedis MA5 (gain at minimum) > Retro Doublewide compressor not applying much compression at all > Logic with no processing.

Just listening on a computer monitor speaker (better than a laptop, but still awful), that Khan is much superior. IMO.

The Mantle sounds stuffy and boxy by comparison, but I've never heard a Mantle demo I liked. YMMV.
 
Just listening on a computer monitor speaker (better than a laptop, but still awful), that Khan is much superior. IMO.

The Mantle sounds stuffy and boxy by comparison, but I've never heard a Mantle demo I liked. YMMV.
The Mantle sounds like a solid state preamp/DI and the EQ is nice on it. I can’t knock it, have been gigging it for months and haven’t been able to knock it off the board. I do wish there was a mids control which is why the VTbass is on the board for now. All of that said the Khan sounds just right to me. Getting to use it tonight on a gig and it sounds pretty huge in the ears. Have a Darkglass Harmonic booster coming in to pair with it.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7097.jpeg
    IMG_7097.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 8

Latest posts