• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New Origin Effects DCX Bass

I'd be really curious to hear more about this. My main gig is P-Bass with TI Flats into an Arkham Oracle, playing largely 60s-70s classics.

In addition to just acting as an overdrive, I prefer if my overdrive also works well feeding a filter. My Fifth Gear does really well at the first, but less well at the second. The Night Owl Parabellum I had was awesome at the second, and would've been awesome at the first in another group, but probably was a little too much on the top end crunch for this use. MBD-2 did pretty well at both but at the time I felt I wanted more control over the mids than it offered. The Lil Fella just didn't work for my situation and was gone quickly. The Phat Phuk B sounded fine but didn't offer the sort of gain control I was after.
i feel a eq pedal in front for which you could adjust/boost the mid or a od/dist with more of a mid character would have helped those pedals especially the MBD 2. would you say that the dcx is mid forward?
 
i feel a eq pedal in front for which you could adjust/boost the mid or a od/dist with more of a mid character would have helped those pedals especially the MBD 2. would you say that the dcx is mid forward?

The DCX in EQ mode is pretty flat for the most part (voice switch dependent), whilst the OD mode sounds like it has a bit of a push in the mids going on, which I really like.
I've only used the DCX after a filter so far, which sounded wonderful. I would imagine it would feed a filter well though. I'd maybe start with EQ mode for this, as it's high end has a slightly rougher character compared to the OD mode, which is sort-of-smoother whilst remaining aggressive (if that makes any sense).
 
Totally different animals. The Jive, as you know, has no tone controls. I like to use it in what I think is the most popular application, which is setting it to saturate, but not really distort. I'm getting the most out of it by placing it just after compression to make sure I hit the sweetest spot on the gain with consistency.

The Origin does two things that make it special.
The EQ side is half of the magic, with the HF knob bringing a good amount of note definition and the LF knob bringing those bits of the low end that make sense, both knobs feel (to my ear and in my particular setup) like they try to bring out the best of that range while trying to step around the downsides those frequencies bring.
Lows bring mud, Highs bring string noise - but on the Origin, they don't do it as bad as one would think.

The Drive side is the other half, and here we get that adaptive treble roll off in low gain mode that feels like magic, especially when you're picking chords - with the HF knob set to a boost, you get that sparkly definition going, but once you dig in, upon crossing from clean to drive, the notes bloom up with that creamy warm texture and without being harsh on the ear.
Apart from that, this is one of the most dynamic drive pedals out there - if not THE most dynamic.

The Jive is just a little tone sweetener that makes things sound ... better.
The Origin is a "make bass sound better" EQ, coupled with a super dynamic drive and this nifty party trick of the adaptive treble rolloff as a cherry on top.
So does the Jive do something the DCX can’t do? Is there any reason to own/use both?
 
So does the Jive do something the DCX can’t do? Is there any reason to own/use both?

That is to be found out - I only had two days so far.
Stick the Jive just after your comp and set it just before breakup with all the diode switches to the left.
That is the 'moar tone' position. I can't recreate something similar with the DCX. Yet.
The Jive, in that setting, also does interesting things to the texture of other dirt pedals you play into it.
 
I gave the DCX a try today and was surprisingly disappointed. I absolutely loved how it reacted to my playing and the EQ was great, but the drive was unpleasant. It was reminiscent of the tone I get when driving my (cheap) audio interfaces (3rd-generation Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 and Audient ID4 MK2). Mind you, I've never tried a UA610. I suppose I'm just not a fan of overdriven mic preamps? :sorry:
 
I gave the DCX a try today and was surprisingly disappointed. I absolutely loved how it reacted to my playing and the EQ was great, but the drive was unpleasant. It was reminiscent of the tone I get when driving my (cheap) audio interfaces (3rd-generation Focusrite Scarlett 4i4 and Audient ID4 MK2). Mind you, I've never tried a UA610. I suppose I'm just not a fan of overdriven mic preamps? :sorry:
Out of curiosity, did you try the med/dark voicings? Either way, might just not be your thing.
 
Are you talking about the DCX? There is nothing digital about it.
It is. There are hints that some devices are digital or analog. The obvious is that OE did not mention it has an analog circuit but I will provide a solid proof instead of trivial.
If you look at the manual under "FCC Certification" it says -
This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device ...
 
It is. There are hints that some devices are digital or analog. The obvious is that OE did not mention it has an analog circuit but I will provide a solid proof instead of trivial.
If you look at the manual under "FCC Certification" it says -
This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device ...
That has more to do with what frequency it will create in a non commercial environment. It doesn't mean it's digital, it's classification .
 
It is. There are hints that some devices are digital or analog. The obvious is that OE did not mention it has an analog circuit but I will provide a solid proof instead of trivial.
If you look at the manual under "FCC Certification" it says -
This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device ...
The BassRig pedals also contain that same "Digital" FCC Certification. The webpage may not use the phrase "All-Analogue" like their other pedals, but the information provided to the retailers does: Invalid Link Removed

@Origin_Effects do you want to settle this as well?
 
Last edited:
It is. There are hints that some devices are digital or analog. The obvious is that OE did not mention it has an analog circuit but I will provide a solid proof instead of trivial.
If you look at the manual under "FCC Certification" it says -
This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class B digital device ...
It says that on every Origin Effects Pedal I’ve ever read a manual on, including stuff like the Bassrigs which are surrounded by ad copy crowing about the all-analogue circuitry. Or, go look at the manual for something like an Empress Para EQ Deluxe II: same thing. Being classified as a Class B Digital Device doesn’t mean there’s AD/DA conversion going on. Plus, I have a hard time imagining that sort of thing going on with a power draw of 90 mAh at 9v.
 
Last edited:
FCC Authorization of Digital Devices

Digital devices are everywhere. From mobile phones to tablets, cameras to smartwatches, audio to gaming, billions of digital devices are in use worldwide.

In the United States, nearly all digital devices must be authorized under the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) rules prior to being marketed or imported into the country. The FCC’s rules mitigate the potential for harmful interference between devices and ensure the devices meet certain other requirements, including those related to RF exposure limits.
 
Last edited:
You are still fundamentally misunderstanding what FCC classification of a digital device means. All sorts of all-analogue equipment will be classified as digital by the FCC if any component generates a signal above 9 kHz, and this can be as simple as a charge pump within a pedal to up the voltage internally.

Furthermore, a given product can even use digital logic, but not generate any signals above the threshold of 9 kHz, and not be considered a digital device for this sort of certification.
 
Last edited:
I've always wanted to try a drive pedal made by Origin. Your Cali76 compact bass knocked it out of the park for me. It is hands down the best comp I ever laid ears on and fits my needs perfectly.
When I saw that you released a pedal with 'bass' in the name and a knob named 'Drive', I pulled the trigger without thinking. It arrived today and turned out to be the most dynamic drive pedal I ever played. It really can breathe some life into my dead flatwound strings and this voicing switch is like magic. I can mix in a generous helping of top end and have the bass sound sparkly when clean, but not harsh on the ear when pushed into overdrive.

I will try to put it after compression, but playing the DCX into the Cali felt like the natural thing to do and having such sensitive reactions to playing dynamics is just too good to give up by putting it after the comp.
Sweet man, always good to hear your take on things! Making me GAS for the DCX even more :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: el murdoque
Can't wait to hear what you have to say about this. I have a BP-1C also. I'm keen on a DCX Bass and running it after my Cali76.
I've been interested in the Caveman for awhile. The lack of EQ is a little concerning from my end for the price, but it's interesting to pairing the BP-1C with the DCX.
 
The digital classification is most likely the power supply.

What are Class B (Unintentional) Devices?
Class B represents most electronic devices that are specifically made and marketed for the general public. Anything that requires IC chips, clocks, oscillators, or other electronic components is generally considered a Class B device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flewis and BEADist

Latest posts