TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Well that's undoubtably the silliest thing I've heard on here for a while...Sire bass is great with nice price, but i am disappointed with the Sire headstock shape and brand name font just look like cheap china copy.
Just my 2cent.
I kind of agree with cflat,Well that's undoubtably the silliest thing I've heard on here for a while...
I kind of agree with cflat,
However, yahboy's also got a point in that the Sire headstock -while certainly not the worst- doesn't exactly scream "style" or "good design".
Still, if I needed a good Jazz and didn't have the scratch for a Skyline, I'd probably buy a Sire. I can live with an ungainly headstock if the rest of the instrument is solid and looks classy.
It's not ungainly, just different..Perfectly balanced...
...I'm a player, I don't buy an instrument for it's looks.

My thought is that there's such variety at all price points now that you don't usually have to have sacrifice one of those even at the "affordable" instrument level.
Just to clarify, are we talking about the bass balance or the look of the headstock?Well I guess you have to actually have one..I have a flock of basses just sitting around here staring at me now..I only use one, because it is superior to all my other ex favourite basses...and it is perfectly balanced. Other bassists want to know 'what the hell that is' because its the most 'killer sounding bass you ever had'
I find the Sire V7 headstock has been inspired more or less from this 'duck beak' shape below...
I honestly like the Sire headstock better than this Carvin headstock. I'm rather less fond of the big headstock on the M3 and M7, as well, but it's livable.I find the Sire V7 headstock has been inspired more or less from this 'duck beak' shape below...
![]()
Just to clarify, are we talking about the bass balance or the look of the headstock?
I've no doubt that the bass is physically balanced, the big bodies of Jazz basses mean that they rarely have any issues with neck dive.
My comment was about the aesthetics. I don't want to harp on it too much though. A classy bass with a mediocre headstock (my opinion of the Sire) is still a good looking bass, just not a great looking bass.
How many here plays mostly four string but own five string as well?
I am now in a dilemma..should I get a five string instead the four I ordered?
I am still learning and playing (very bad but trying my best) different brand/model 4 string basses so I am not tied up to any specific neck size or string space.
Recently I got a great deal on a Sterling Ray 35 and to my surprise I am having less difficulty to to play it than I thought I would have. For sure I miss one or more string sometimes but I still can use it, hence the doubt now if I should swap my 4 to a 5 instead.
I just don't wanna do the move to later regret and let the P7 collecting dust.![]()