• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New: Zoom B3n Multi-Effects

That's a real bummer. I always thought the updates for new effects, cabs, amps were woefully slow but at least we were getting something from time to time.
Obviously, I don't have a crystal ball, but when is see that they made this firmware update without any thing new, and that they have new products, it smells familiar. The old stupid policy of kiling a product in hope to sell the new one.
This has only one effect on me: kill the brand image. In this case Zoom loose any credibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J_Bass
Obviously, I don't have a crystal ball, but when is see that they made this firmware update without any thing new, and that they have new products, it smells familiar. The old stupid policy of kiling a product in hope to sell the new one.
This has only one effect on me: kill the brand image. In this case Zoom loose any credibility.
We’re talking about a cheap, entry level sub-$500 all-in-one modeller.

There are no subscription fees or one-time charges for firmware updates.

The MS-series pedals went without an update for a couple of years, and then got a final blast, that doubled the number of effects. I thought of it as a thank-you gesture to their fans, as they retired that series and moved on to new things with the n-series pedals.

We may still see something of that nature for the Gn and Bn pedals at some point, but I’m not holding my breath.

Zoom is not unusual in this. Line 6 isn’t releasing new stuff for their older floor modellers, and they inhabit a much higher price point. The same goes for the old Yamaha Modelers, and various others that have fallen by the wayside.

If you thought they were going to give you lifetime free updates in terms of brand new samples, then I’m afraid you may have been a little naive.

How does a company monetize their creative output, if they’re always giving it away?
 
I'm not asking for free life time updates. Just a basic respect for their consumer. And a logical thought, as when you buy something, you may think it will evolve into something better. If it does not, next time you will think twice before buying anything.
The fact that other brands does the same does not mean it's justified. It only mean that the market is full of brands that don't give a poopie about their clients.
If we, as consumers, accept this, or worst , justify it, then you can be sure we will not get better products soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J_Bass and The Rage
Nothing to do with a Fender, we are speaking about a digital device...
Anyway, I'm not here to convince anyone to have an intelligent/responsible consumer attitude...
out of interest what are you typing this on?
I’m guessing you update your phone or laptop every 5-10 years or so? Digital technology progresses and old things become mothballed and unsupported. Zoom either spend their money developing new stuff for the B3n you bought with no promise of updates, or they move onto developing a device with more powerful processors that will be even better- and Will compete with whatever Line6 and everyone else are developing now.... it might be nice if they can keep developing stuff for me and you on existing hardware and while that might be a good customer attitude it would be really bad business for a company who make and sell hardware
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greyplaysmusic
planned obsolescence: the policy of deliberately limiting the life of a product in order to encourage the purchaser to replace it. Also called:built-in obsolescence.
But yes, you go on buying new phones, computer and digital effects every year... That's perfect for these companies, and that's also good for the planet, and the children who work extracting coltan.

I'm not going with this conversation, it's obviously not the place for this.
Simply I wish that companies would be more responsible with their customers.
 
I would be fine if they offered additional effects or amps sims for a small fee.

The phone/computer analogy doesn’t really work because Apple and android and Microsoft are continually adding additional functionality at no charge up until the time your processing can’t keep up.

What I would like though is fixes like a pitch shifter that doesn’t increase volume to the point you have to add a preamp of some sort to reduce the gain. This ends up adding unwanted flavor and uses an unnecessary slot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oly Spart
planned obsolescence: the policy of deliberately limiting the life of a product in order to encourage the purchaser to replace it. Also called:built-in obsolescence...

...Simply I wish that companies would be more responsible with their customers.

I also have a strong bias against the disposable nature of current digital gear. I used to purchase audio equipment with the knowledge that if I bought the good stuff and looked after it, I could expect it to out-last my career.

That is clearly no longer the case, and I particularly dislike the impact this has on the environment. That said, I'm not being fair or honest when I start bitching about the "good old days".

Back in the day, that nearly indestructible equipment cost many, many times what we are paying now. Plus, it was extremely inflexible, so I had to have a lot more of it.

I could only dream of owning my own studio in the early '70's. A decent console cost more than most houses.

In the early '80's, I was in a marginally successful rock band. I order to compete with the drummer, my 250w SS Traynor head had to be hooked up to four E-V 15's. I needed a van just to carry my own gear.

I was also playing some guitar, and had a half-dozen expensive tube amps and cabs at various power ratings. I did a quick inventory at one point, and realized that I had well over $20,000 invested in my measly little collection. I shudder to think what that would be in today's dollars.


As much as the current market feels like some sort of bait-and-switch scheme, there's never been a better time to be a musician in terms of the range of sounds you can produce, and how little personal sacrifice it takes to get there.

I would be fine if they offered additional effects or amps sims for a small fee.

The phone/computer analogy doesn’t really work because Apple and android and Microsoft are continually adding additional functionality at no charge up until the time your processing can’t keep up.
I'm not sure that this comparison holds up, either.

Software is increasingly switching over to subscription fees that have you pretty much re-purchasing all your apps, every year to 18 months.

Most Android phones are only supported with OS upgrades for maybe 2 or 3 Android versions. Don't even get me started on the way Apple intentionally slows their hardware down, or the way that Mac's performance per dollar ratio has been slipping over the last 5 years!
 
I've wondered that too. I'd seen this video of a guy using the g3n with b3n firmware. In the comments ZoomSoundLab says its the g3n using b3n effects/patches. I assume the same would go for the g5n


hi,brother,could you do me a favour to speak the details about updating a G3 with a B3 firmware. i am trying to get a used G3 for the modifying cos i hate the red cover of B3 indeed. hahaha thanks anyway
 
Hiya, just gota B3n & pleased with the scope compared to my old B2.1u, which only just died-failed switch.
Can't get the patch software to progress past, Device found, loading . . . got the update pathes in the pool, but no access to my device, even with the device showing: PC mode.
Wondering, do I need to do the firmware update first? If so then how, if the patch/editor isnt recognised . .
Any suggestions? Cheers, p
 
Hiya, just gota B3n & pleased with the scope compared to my old B2.1u, which only just died-failed switch.
Can't get the patch software to progress past, Device found, loading . . . got the update pathes in the pool, but no access to my device, even with the device showing: PC mode.
Wondering, do I need to do the firmware update first? If so then how, if the patch/editor isnt recognised . .
Any suggestions? Cheers, p

It's not that hard to replace the switches on a B2 should you want to have a backup.
 
I've been on here complaining a bit about my new B3n as I've been working to find a clear use for it that I like, and I can say I finally found it. Although some of the other effects are solid (reverbs, delays envelope filters, etc.), I've been unhappy with the distortion and amp sims while running through a real bass amp both for practice or rehearsal. I really wanted to find at least a couple distortions/amp sims that I liked as much as my Tech 21 VT. I was actually planning on packing it up and driving it to the store to return it this afternoon, and figured before going I'd try playing it through headphones just for the heck of it. I actually quite like the sound I'm getting through headphones with some of the amp sims. Then I tried sending an aux in signal from my computer with recordings of my band rehearsals and playing along with that, and I am extremely satisfied with the results of that. I had bought it to use live, but am thinking it will more than pull it's weight as a home practice tool even if it never leaves the house. With that being said, if I didn't get such a great deal on a used one I'd probably be returning it for a B1 Four, seeing as the ease of live use was why I went for the B3n in the first place...but I'm not going to complain.

It depends also a lot how you use your B3n with an amp. Connecting the main output of the B3n with the main input of your amp, you have two preamps in series. In my experience this can easily make the overall sound muddy or otherwise not satisfying. I have therefore started using my B3 MS-60B and B3n only in the return of the effects loop of my bass amp. This means using the Zoom effects device only as a preamp (we had a nice thread devoted only to that topic while the B3 was top notch - Zoom B3 As Preamp and Zoom B3 As Preamp Part 2). I have used a simple Y-cable to split the main output from my bass going firstly into the main amp input and secondly into the input of the B3/MS-60B/B3n. My bass amp (Trace Elliot AH1000-12) comes with a footswitch (FC-6), which allows to control the effects loop (in serial mode). That stomps allows me then to either use my bass amp without the Zoom multi effects (effects loop off) or then with the Zoom multi effects device as a preamp (effects loop on). Simple and in terms of sounds very satisfying (at least for my taste). Find more details here Zoom B3 As Preamp

Have you considered that?
 
Hey man, good questions, but I am asking about the generically accepted way to get a bass amplified in a band setting. I will try to clarify by saying what the components in a guitar rig do and hoping that you can point me to similar info for the bass.

Again, no matter who you are or what style of music you play, guitar signal flow can be typified as
Guitar -> preamp (does EQ, adds clipping/compression) -> power amp (makes it louder) -> cabinet (output of signal, as well as strong frequency tweaking to focus the tone of the guitar on its more pleasant central frequencies while doing a sharp dropoff around 4-5kHz to minimize its unpleasant highs). You can additionally add a mic to the guitar cab, usually done off-axis to further reduce sharp peaks that would grate your ears in the PA speakers.

That's traditional guitar amplification, how you get a pleasant sound to sit in with the band.

Bass is a whole other ballgame. While the cab is a gigantic part of the guitar's sound, the bass conversely seems to me like it would sound good through an FRFR cab. People send their bass to FOH through XLR from their preamps, completely bypassing any tone-shaping the cabinet does. This is unthinkable in guitar-world.

So what I am trying to understand is what a cab does for the bassist. On the B3n, you can blend the dry signal with it if you choose (for the G5n cabs, it's more of a binary decision and you'd gonly leave the cab model out of your chain if you were plugging into a real guitar cab). Whereas bassists can take it or leave it, it seems?

The nice website by Charlie may still offer some answers to what you are talking about: Zoom B3 In addition I remember we also had excellent analysis with all the frequency diagrams for cab simulations in one of the B3 threads (Zoom B3 As Preamp and Zoom B3 As Preamp Part 2) but I am afraid I can’t point you exactly to those rich sources of infos right now. Perhaps someone else remembers where we had all those frequency plots?