I think my Rumble 800 head has one around 40. My Fdeck usually ends up between 80-100.Have you checked whether your amp has a built-in hpf already? Or is there one and you want a higher frequency setting?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I think my Rumble 800 head has one around 40. My Fdeck usually ends up between 80-100.Have you checked whether your amp has a built-in hpf already? Or is there one and you want a higher frequency setting?
As long as it’s active, I’m in. I don’t want to mess with a passive HPF.I like the idea of an always-on HPF. But it occurs to me that there might be a market for an always-off HPF. I think I could make one that is relatively inexpensive and highly reliable. Anyone interested?
It’s a simple circuit. I am sure you could build one into a cable with a minimal enclosure. Especially since you want a fixed position.
Pssst, just had a wild hair. You could wire the output of your bass since it’s just a cap and resistor. Bury it in the cavity. Only problem is that wouldn’t account for your amp EQ. Hmmm.
If you’d like a schem or layout for an active HPF I’d be happy to send one over. Also fdeck has a lot of tech info for his HPF that he generously posted on his siteWhat I meant by the wrong forum is the effects forum. It's the flip side of not dissing effects in the effects forum. Some folks see even the desire to avoid a 9v powered thing on the floor on a rig without any of them as an affront.
The good news is I can literally breadboard a 2 stage fixed HPF tonight as long as I can find what I did with most of my gear. (and while the iron is hot I need to fix the faulty switchcraft $25 toggle on my passivated TMB105 with a cheaper but working import switch).
Wiring it behind your tone, before the jack is the same as a passive circuit on the floor in a box. With a fixed cut frequency it’s a resistor and a cap, same ingredients as a treble bleed but with different values. If it doesn’t ruin your tone in a pedal on the floor, or as an onboard amp control, it won’t ruin your sound on your bass.Wiring a passive HPF into your bass will OBLITERATE your signal level, and the slope of the roll off will leave your signal hopelessly shrill and devoid of bottom, no matter how much makeup gain you add
Oh I’m sorry, I didn’t clarify. That will absolutely OBLITERATE your signal level on the floor in a box.Wiring it behind your tone, before the jack is the same as a passive circuit on the floor in a box. With a fixed cut frequency it’s a resistor and a cap, same ingredients as a treble bleed but with different values. If it doesn’t ruin your tone in a pedal on the floor, or as an onboard amp control, it won’t ruin your sound on your bass.
Open up your boutique HPF. What do you see? It’s the simplest circuit on anyone’s rig.Oh I’m sorry, I didn’t clarify. That will absolutely OBLITERATE your signal level on the floor in a box.
a first order passive filter, loading guitar pickups of course, just isn’t a solution, outside of a dedication to a very particular tone, with lows that slope away for a looooooong time, taking a lot of signal with it. Luckily, a very simple circuit will do it just fine, on your bass, or in a box, with an egg or with a fox
edit: this is not like a treble bleed, you are irrevocably choking your entire signal. Without a buffer, the rolloff curve could fit a parade along it before you even reach the corner frequency.
Right, I’ve designed and built several. None of the HPF’s so beloved here are a box with a series capacitor and a resistor to ground. The Fdeck, all three versions, are active with a buffer. The broughton is active and buffered.Open up your boutique HPF. What do you see? It’s the simplest circuit on anyone’s rig.
An earlier post on this very thread would tell you differentlyThere may be a small niche of passive devices, but those are NOT for a bass guitar rig,
Can I take you up on that offer as well?If you’d like a schem or layout for an active HPF I’d be happy to send one over. Also fdeck has a lot of tech info for his HPF that he generously posted on his site
Open up your boutique HPF. What do you see?
The biggest problem with a pedal solution is the need for power and I can’t think of a single amp that will allow you to power a pedal directly from it.
Okay I’ll address the one with three devicesAn earlier post on this very thread would tell you differently
It is a PF500. I've found a schematic for the power supply only, not the effects loop. In an effects loop by itself it should be easy to calculate if I can find the impedances. I was planning to just make it a fixed 90hz but it'd be simple to make it adjustable with a T filter.
30hz HPF is a safety feature, and while it is a HPF is not the same purpose as what most of the Fdeck/qStrip/et al are being used for.
After seeing the values needed for a 70-100hz hpf I really don't think an LC filter is the way to go. An RC T-filter gets you there with way more reasonable values. Insertion loss is going to depend on the capacitors used but in the nF range there should be some good choices.
Im kinda busy the next 48 hrs but when I get some down time in I'll run it through ngspice.
It is a PF500. I've found a schematic for the power supply only, not the effects loop. In an effects loop by itself it should be easy to calculate if I can find the impedances. I was planning to just make it a fixed 90hz but it'd be simple to make it adjustable with a T filter.
30hz HPF is a safety feature, and while it is a HPF is not the same purpose as what most of the Fdeck/qStrip/et al are being used for.
After seeing the values needed for a 70-100hz hpf I really don't think an LC filter is the way to go. An RC T-filter gets you there with way more reasonable values. Insertion loss is going to depend on the capacitors used but in the nF range there should be some good choices.
Im kinda busy the next 48 hrs but when I get some down time in I'll run it through ngspice.