• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Not another Tele build! Yawn

It's funny, that's more or less the opposite of my experience! :laugh:
I suppose I should say I've never used either product on a guitar, only on furniture. But I definitely found the osmo to be thicker than the rubio.




If you look at the osmo website, they say 2 coats if using a brush or roller, and at least 4 coats if using a rag.
Interesting, when you've used Rubio, was it with the Accelerator?
 
Here's that repair i patched in the other day. It looks ok, I may try and improve that glue line a bit, we'll see after it's properly sanded in.
PXL_20240208_134734779.MP~2.jpg


I got the fretboard cleaned up today with an 80 grit radius block, and got the headstock scoop finished. Still needs a bit of tweaking where the maple burned a bit, but looking pretty good overall.
PXL_20240208_133225147~2.jpg
 
The rattle I mentioned earlier didn't go away even when tightening the truss rod up, so I made the decision to remove the rod from the rear of the neck. It seemed the less destructive option than removing the fretboard.
This is the high tech holding jig for the neck. (You can see this was taken after I had already routed the groove).
PXL_20240213_131516513.jpg

Then I just clamped two pieces of MDF to guide the router cutter.
PXL_20240212_133359023~2.jpg


Rod has been liberated!

PXL_20240213_132803216~2.jpg


I have an offcut of the birds eye maple which will make a nice skunk stripe.
 
More luck than judgement! I knew roughly how deep the rod was, so when I was close I took very shallow passes until I saw the rod. I just kissed the top of it with the cutter but no harm done.

You’re lucky I read this before I started drinking! Else my response would have been totally inappropriate…. :wideyed::angel:
 
It's funny, even tho it's literally called Rubio "MonoCoat" I see just about every woodworker applying a second coat to "bump up the sheen". I wonder if Osmo could benefit the same way.
Having used both Rubio Monocoat and Osmo Poly-X I much prefer Poly-X. Osmo's official application instructions call for a second coat, so they obviously feel that the user needs to at least do that.
After experimenting with both of these "hard oils" I've found that sanding beyond 220 prevents proper application. If the wood surface isn't sufficiently "porous" then the product can't penetrate and bind to the wood cells as it is designed to do.

Osmo is available in a few different sheens, but I love satin finishes, especially on necks.

e9Msz3I.jpg
 
Last edited:
Planed flush.
View attachment 5352856

No more rattle. And it looks killer, so win/win!

I found some osmo in the cupboard at work so I tested a bit on this spare piece of maple, looks good to me. Looks slightly more orange in the picture than real life.

View attachment 5352862

I really like the "inverse" skunk stripe look you get from the light wood strip embedded into the dark neck shaft (it's closer to what an actual skunk looks like).
 
@Flying B, I've been following along here and I am starting to plan my own Telecaster build (I have one that does the classic Tele thing but I want to make one with a neck P90 and a bridge rail humbucker). Your thread here is one of a number that have inspired me to want to try this myself, so thank you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej