Constructing a bass line using a chord chart, if you come across chords that are more complex than the usual major/minor/7th, such as 9th, 11th, #5 etc, would it be "standard practice" to incorporate those extra notes into the line (such as in walking bass), or more common to just treat these chords like, say, 7ths?
Thanks
Michael
In straight ahead jazz it's most common to see extensions when they are modified. In other words is more common to see D7b9 or D7+9 than simply D9.
Normally walking bass lines will include other notes than the chord tones. In other words its not unusual to play a 9, 11, or 6 over a 7 chord. I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I find the 6th to be most ambiguous and problematic. But it's actually fairly common to play a major 6th over all minor 7 chords even if the chord is a "i". Here's a good article that explains:
Everything You Don't Know About Minor Harmony in Jazz • Jazzadvice
It's also not unusual to play non-diatonic tones: I suggest reviewing at least the concepts of chromatic approach and chromatic surround in this book:
[Bob magnusson] the_art_of_walking_bass_a_method_(book_za.org) (slideshare.net).
I use chromatic approaches intuitively. Chromatic surround is a relatively new concept for me...and bit more difficult to use effectively IMHO. But I think it would become intuitive if I actually practiced


.
I think of bass lines as being formed in two ways: 1 arpeggiated, 2. linear.
Arpeggiated is generally stacked chord tones. But in some instances you can also stack non chord tones. For example if a chord lasts more than one bar you can play an arpeggiated sequence that alternates been chord tones and none chord tones, but it's usually a good idea to bookend chord tones around the non chord arpeggio.
Linear is essentially scale form. You might play something like 1,2,3,4 over a I chord leading to a V chord.
You can also use a hybrid approach that mixes linear and arpeggiated.
Most people seem to prefer the sound of a linear walking line, but IMHO the best choice can depend on the style of music you are playing. Sometimes arpeggiated is required. Usually I alternate and the proportion of each type of line varies, depending on the chord changes and style.
Regarding learning to walk...you start of simple and get more complex as you become more knowledgeable. So I would suggest you learn to play arpeggiated lines first, linear lines second, and finally learn to mix in non-diatonic tones.
To learn arpeggiated, you might start with just the roots. Next you might alternate between root 5 and root 3. When you get comfortable with that you might throw in the 7.
When you are ready to start trying to build linear lines: Generally you play the root on 1, consonant chord tones on 1 and 3, and non-chord tones on 2 and 4. As you get more advanced you can learn to break these rules.
I actually learned to walk by copying recordings note for note long before I had any grasp of music theory. I was lucky enough to play in a university big band for two years when I was in high-school. The music director gave me the music and recordings. Since I could not read chord changes I had to learn the recordings well enough to start and stop during band rehearsals.