Can anyone offer a direct comparison between the Super Twin (no tweeter) and Big Twin 3? I currently own a ST and like it quite a bit, but I've been researching the BT recently and think I'd prefer it. How much do you actually gain from the bigger, more expensive cab?
As a reference my favorite all time cabs were a pair of Fearless 115s. By comparison the ST seems a little lacking in low end "bloom" even when boosting lows. It feels very tight and controlled which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but there are times when I want more depth particularly when using octaver and/or synth effects. I also feel that the Super Twin doesn't project as well ada single F115 which has been wondering about mid drivers/tweeters and crossovers. It's not that I really require more high end than the ST puts out but with the upgraded horn and crossover network in the BT it may provide a more "enveloping" sound for lack of a better description.
One of the Fearless cabs was almost always more than enough for any gig i ever did and even standing directly in front of it. I could hear everything evenly. That was with only the 3015lf and mid. I never used the tweeter on those cabs. I could eq it to sound any way I wanted and used amp/cab modeling frequently to amazing affect. I think the Big Baby/Big Twin are more what I'm looking for would love some real world comparisons if possible.
Obviously I could try and commission another Fearless build, but the options are extremely limited and the build time very long. Which has brought me to the Barefaced....
Thanks in advance for your input.