Mr. Majestic,
I am not trying to bust your *****, but what do you mean by "within Elrick specs"? Clearly, the Elrick pups are causing the output issue. Furthermore, any pup will work in that bass. Heck, he could slap a Music Man pup in that thing if he so desired. The only thing he needs to do is make sure he knows his string spacing prior to ordering the pup he wants to go with. The only thing I can think off that you might be trying explain "spec" is, is the pup dimension. If that is the case, a competent luthier can do a route job for a relatively nominal fee. Again, I am not trying to bust your *****, just trying to figure out what you are trying to say as I am a little confused.
As far as heavy ash sounding better........I never said heavy ash sounded better. I said the heavy ash bodies found in the 70's and 80's jazz basses are one of the main reasons they have that distinctive tone, ie. Marcus Miller.......I was just merely pointing out that if he is expecting to get that some tone out of his Elrick, that it could be a challange due to him missing the "main ingredient" - the heavy ash body. Again, I never said one was better...........Although I do think the right pups can get him close.
PS - I was cleaning out my PM box and came across the PMs when we were talking about trading my Lakland for your Devon.........MAN, I really wanted that bass!!!!!!!!!!!! In the end, I am glad I kept my 55-94. I definitly would have regretted letting the Lakland go. I was just curious as to what you replaced your Devon with and if you regretted getting rid of the Devon.