Yup! Now I have two Gibson/Tobias guitars and a Pre-Gibson Tobias bass. But a pre-Gibson 4 would have been fantastic! Anxious to see pictures when it comes in.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I think a lot of the bad press is just simple hogwash.
I do not think that Mr Tobias is a bad guy at all but he is the only one that has laughed all the way to the bank on both ends of this deal.
For me when seeking a Neck Through Bass a Bolt On will not do. Nothing wrong with a Bolt On Bass but not the same. For those seeking that original Tobias Bass I suggest looking for a used one.
The Gibson units certainly are a steal of a deal.
Ever see a Killer B's or Growler's quality knocked? But Gibson built all of those. Interesting stuff indeed.
I believe there has been a magnifying glass used when looking at the Gibson units and Rose Colored Warm and Fuzzies when looking at the originals. After all theses are man made instruments, made from wood. Wood sometimes does things you would not want it to regardless of who ran the saw.




No one made Mike sell Tobias.
To be fair, I think part of selling the company was to help with production from the increased demand, as was Spector (to Kramer and ultimately Gibson). Turning it into a mostly import line or overpriced "custom" shop probably wasn't the original intention.
I am not defending Gibson at all.
Everyone knew who/what Gibson is/was way before Tobias came along.
If Gibson was evil in 92 it was evil before 92.
Again No one made Mike sell the company whatever the motive would be and common sense will tell you once you sell the company, it no longer belongs to you.
I still make the case that most of this has been the typical "the originals were better mentality" leading to anything past that being critiqued to death and I can see how some would be upset at that statement. I do not mean to offend.
The first I ever heard talk of poor quality was from Mike on the phone in 92. I know a little bit about neck through Bass construction. I do not knock the MTD's at all I'm sure they are excellent quality. Neck through Basses they are not. Yes he will build you one and yes you will pay but folks complained about Gibson's prices as well.
As far as I am concerned saying you played a poorly made Gibson Bass counts for nothing. I have read every thread on Talkbass about these Basses. There is not one example of actual "here it is" proof.
Like I said before the closest I could find that did raise an eyebrow was rejected Basses being made out the back door. I could see how quality could get poor real quick in this manner and I have seen this situation before.
Sloppy wiring is sloppy wiring whatever you choose to think about it. No matter whether it is done by hand or by machine. If the pigs will eat it then call it what it is.


Being passionate in favor of early Mike masterpieces = OK.
Not liking Gibson as your own opinion = OK. (I don't either)
Stating that all Gibson/Nashville made Tobias instruments are lousy = irrational/not well informed.
BTW I spent some time working with the technical folks in the Nashville shop to upgrade the electronics on a Mike Signature. Mike supported that. They were perfectly great and knowledgeable to deal with. Making the generalization that you don't like Gibson, therefore everyone who worked there is scum = ignorant.
Making inferences that any bass player who plays a Nashville made instrument is a fool and doesn't know what they are talking about = ignorant and provocative.
Guys, its cool to feel strongly positive about Mike and his instruments; but, lets be respectful and not let the animosity toward the big corporate mistakes boil over into unreasonable discourse between bass brothers and sisters. Not that anyone has done so; just sayin'.
GL2A
As I understand it from a source close to it at the time, he was squeezed so badly by them he had to virtually give it up or else. It was NOT done nicely at all...hardball all the way...they put the boots to him. And financially it was a TOTAL joke. Gibson sucks, I'm sorry.

As I understand it from a source close to it at the time, he was squeezed so badly by them he had to virtually give it up or else. It was NOT done nicely at all...hardball all the way...they put the boots to him. And financially it was a TOTAL joke. His only crime was building basses so beautiful and SO good, everybody on the planet wanted one and he couldn't make them fast enough.
And Gibson totally sucks, I'm sorry.
Guess you don't mind what they did to Trace either...or Steinberger, or Oberheim, or...
We were THIS CLOSE to loosing tc electronic to them as well a couple of years ago...thank GOD that fell through...
Nobody has said that but you. I just said the Nashville instruments were nowhere NEAR as good as what Mr. T himself built, and anyone who has played a few will attest to that. The few Nashville era ones I have played were OK, certainly not stellar, and pale by comparison to the pre-Gibson ones I have played, which have been extraordinary. And the Korean/whatever ones I have played were a crime against music/humanity considering they were at first still trying to charge what Mr. T. did for a completely machine made instrument. Horrid things, for $6,000.00, OK for about $1200.00 or less. Ridiculous. They'll try to get away with ANYTHING...completely, 100% ruthless.
And I stand by my Gibson statements 100%...Ptooey! And if this wasn't a family friendly forum, I'd say much worse.
Cameron