• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Oh crap! New Musicman Basses

There is really nothing wrong with these, but I don't see anything particularly inspiring either. I guess they felt the need to fill out that part of the market, a couple of passive bass offerings, but passive basses are not what I look to from MusicMan. I love MusicMan basses but to be honest if I wanted a passive PJ not named Fender, I would be looking at a G&L SB2, not a MusicMan Caprice.

Kudos for them trying something different for themselves, but personally, I really wish that they had kept the Sabre and the color selection they offered prior to this change rather than offering these.
I am sure they will do well with them though.
I'm guessing they cut the Sabre and the rest simply because they didn't sell sufficiently well, which is fair enough. Glad I got my Sabre before they pulled the plug, though. These new offerings look a little lacklustre in pictures, perhaps, but I've had the opportunity to try them both, and they're very nice instruments indeed, and sound great. If I was being uncharitable, I'd say that the main gripe of the "mehsayers" is that they look too much like Fenders. But they have their own tone and personality, and I hope EBMM will do well with them. They would certainly do a great job for many working bassists. But between my Sabre and AmStd P, I don't really need either of them myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: birminghambass
No they actually whacked several models from their lineup along with a ton of color options.

I knew they did some culling, but didn't quite realise the extent of it. There are only 6 colours for the Stingray now? Glad I already own a (Pre-EB) Sabre, at any rate, since that seems to have gone as well.

Still, I stand by my comments, and would definitely like to at least test drive the Caprice. A PJ with MM build quality is pretty tempting.
 
I haven't seen this mentioned in the first few pages - I was looking at a Cdn music store (Long & McQuade) and saw a Fender bass that looked oddly like a MusicMan shaped bass. I thought that was strange but now I see MusicMan is picking the pocket of Fender for shapes.
 
Yah? A year old used model will lose half its retail value while decade old Stingrays still can go for over a grand? Good luck with that.

Maybe you're right. We shall see how this pans out - who knows what those things will be worth. But at least they'll go for $1200 used - or $500...

What do they want what this initiative? The neck-throughs aren't selling? Are these the first passive MM's?
 
They're not for me - and I'm a PJ guy.
In case Musician is reading, here's what I don't like:
  1. According to the pics, the pole pieces don't line up, meaning I question the quality.
  2. 7.5" neck radius. Even Fender moved away from that. I prefer 16", but 12" is a viable option on many basses. Its much more comfortable, especially when playing upper registers.
  3. "Oversized" headstock. Recipe for neck dive. Please, manufacturers, make headstocks smaller, and for 5's, move to a 3+2 config.
  4. Based on the video at MM, just doesn't sound Awe-inspiring.
  5. We just don't need another "Vintage" PJ. We need an affordable, High-quality modern PJ. For me, it would mean all the above, plus the inclusion of a dual coil rather than the Jazz pickup at the bridge.
That's just after a cursory look.

As for poles lining up, you'd have to see it in person as an angle change makes all the difference in a photo. 7.5" radius is a bit small for me too. Most all my basses are 12" though I could live with a 9". Headstock? We'll wait to see what they put on a 5er.

I really DO like the sound in the video though it doesn't really show the range of the bass. Certainly inspiring enough for me to consider a used one to replace my modded Squier PJ, but I don't think it's inspiring enough to have me fork out for a brand new one.

And this DOES seem to me to be a "modern" take on PJ except for the classic look, of course. And while normally I would prefer a dual coil bridge to a jazz pickup for better balance between P and J in this case the J pickup is humbucking (important) and for tone you really want the CLARITY of an inline J to a dual humbucker IF You can get the output to match the P pickup. You'd actually have to play this thing to see if it actually works or not.

The biggest problem here is that while the world is flooded with 4 string P basses with tiny variations between them, everyone treats a 5 string PJ as taboo. This thing in 5 string where the "oversize" headstock is taken up with the extra tuner and maybe the neck radius reduced to 9" would really be the shiznit in my opinion. But obviously another 4 string p-bass is what all bass makers think the world needs because "Leo got it right".
 
Maybe you're right. We shall see how this pans out - who knows what those things will be worth. But at least they'll go for $1200 used - or $500...

What do they want what this initiative? The neck-throughs aren't selling? Are these the first passive MM's?
They want to sell basses. Ill buy one. Many others will as well. They won't sell as much as Stingrays and maybe they'll get discontinued fast, but I'll get one while I can.
 

Latest posts