TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm guessing they cut the Sabre and the rest simply because they didn't sell sufficiently well, which is fair enough. Glad I got my Sabre before they pulled the plug, though. These new offerings look a little lacklustre in pictures, perhaps, but I've had the opportunity to try them both, and they're very nice instruments indeed, and sound great. If I was being uncharitable, I'd say that the main gripe of the "mehsayers" is that they look too much like Fenders. But they have their own tone and personality, and I hope EBMM will do well with them. They would certainly do a great job for many working bassists. But between my Sabre and AmStd P, I don't really need either of them myself.There is really nothing wrong with these, but I don't see anything particularly inspiring either. I guess they felt the need to fill out that part of the market, a couple of passive bass offerings, but passive basses are not what I look to from MusicMan. I love MusicMan basses but to be honest if I wanted a passive PJ not named Fender, I would be looking at a G&L SB2, not a MusicMan Caprice.
Kudos for them trying something different for themselves, but personally, I really wish that they had kept the Sabre and the color selection they offered prior to this change rather than offering these.
I am sure they will do well with them though.
No they actually whacked several models from their lineup along with a ton of color options.
Yah? A year old used model will lose half its retail value while decade old Stingrays still can go for over a grand? Good luck with that.
They're not for me - and I'm a PJ guy.
In case Musician is reading, here's what I don't like:
That's just after a cursory look.
- According to the pics, the pole pieces don't line up, meaning I question the quality.
- 7.5" neck radius. Even Fender moved away from that. I prefer 16", but 12" is a viable option on many basses. Its much more comfortable, especially when playing upper registers.
- "Oversized" headstock. Recipe for neck dive. Please, manufacturers, make headstocks smaller, and for 5's, move to a 3+2 config.
- Based on the video at MM, just doesn't sound Awe-inspiring.
- We just don't need another "Vintage" PJ. We need an affordable, High-quality modern PJ. For me, it would mean all the above, plus the inclusion of a dual coil rather than the Jazz pickup at the bridge.
They want to sell basses. Ill buy one. Many others will as well. They won't sell as much as Stingrays and maybe they'll get discontinued fast, but I'll get one while I can.Maybe you're right. We shall see how this pans out - who knows what those things will be worth. But at least they'll go for $1200 used - or $500...
What do they want what this initiative? The neck-throughs aren't selling? Are these the first passive MM's?
the passive electronics are a win for me.
Is this first time MM has made a passive bass?