or to not admit when they are wrong when provided with concrete proof.There is a special burden upon the pedantic to be correct.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
or to not admit when they are wrong when provided with concrete proof.There is a special burden upon the pedantic to be correct.
I think you could make that argument within a specific context, however, typically "sound" is something differentiated from the rest of the EM spectrum as "requiring a medium through which to propagate". Ultrasound is great example of something that can be proven to be present, propagating, and detectable via the right combination of sensors and processors - and your ears and brain don't qualify as the right equipment to hear/detect "sound" in this frequency range.
I'm an engineer, and to me your point sort of depends on whether you''re asking a physicist or a philosopher to answer the question. From a purely scientific point of view something like the sun is actually blindingly bright even if the only people staring up at it are in fact already blind. A sound that can't be heard by a profoundly deaf person, but could have been heard if they weren't deaf, is still a sound.Sound actually is the very specific range of frequencies that can be detected by a human or animal ear... ultrasonic and subsonic frequencies therefore aren't sound in the strict sense of the word. Of course if I were an alien who could detect vibration in the megahertz or gigahertz range that would be sound to me but not to a human. I'm not, by the way. An alien. Although I could be an alien pedant.
If the original question were "if a tree falls in a forest with no-one there to hear it, does it still make a noise?" rather than "a sound" then the answer would of course be yes. If a tree falls in a forest and lands on a pedant are there less or fewer pedants? Pedant is my word of the day![]()
Let's simplify it.I've looked at the amp FAQs, and tried to search. Sorry to ask something that seems basic, but I'm just looking for a simple confirmation here.
If my amp output is 250W @ 4 ohms, and I daisy chain two 8 ohm 300w power handling cabs, do I have two cabs each getting 125W? Or effectively one larger combined cab getting 250W?
I just trying to make sure I would not be underpowering the two cabs.
Now I'm starting to like this thread! And I thought it was going to be another read the stickies thread.
Some people (maybe animals) with synesthesia see colors when sound get's to their brains. That could be cool if you could train yourself. I might enjoy some other kinds of music more. I've read it ties into perfect pitch.
One synesthete to another synesthete: "If a tree falls in the woods and and nobody is around the hear it, what color is it?"![]()
I just trying to make sure I would not be underpowering the two cabs.
What Dave said, and what Two said really fast... OP, you are correct in your math... the amp effectively sees two 8 ohm cabs as a 4 ohm load, thereby maximizing your amps output, @ 250 watts, splitting the output evenly...
... define, 'daisy chain'...
...and one I could never figure out why it was so easy to buy into...I mean we've all turned down a volume control at some point in our lives and probably not a one of us ever saw a speaker burst into flames or launch parts out of the cabinet because we did it.UNDERPOWERING CABS IS A MYTH
...and one I could never figure out why it was so easy to buy into...I mean we've all turned down a volume control at some point in our lives and probably not a one of us ever saw a speaker burst into flames or launch parts out of the cabinet because we did it.
...and one I could never figure out why it was so easy to buy into...I mean we've all turned down a volume control at some point in our lives and probably not a one of us ever saw a speaker burst into flames or launch parts out of the cabinet because we did it.
You have a 4 ohm load with both cabs connected.
Your amp can output 250w into a 4 ohm load.
Each cab is getting 125w.
There is no such thing as underpowering.
i wouldnt go that far. Its more like a tabloid rumor that is probably true.UNDERPOWERING CABS IS A MYTH
i wouldnt go that far. Its more like a tabloid rumor that is probably true.
Sound is not part of the EM (electro-magnetic) spectrum. Sound is a pressure wave, thus the need for a medium of propagation. EM waves are radio waves, micro waves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, on up through X-rays.I think you could make that argument within a specific context, however, typically "sound" is something differentiated from the rest of the EM spectrum as "requiring a medium through which to propagate". Ultrasound is great example of something that can be proven to be present, propagating, and detectable via the right combination of sensors and processors - and your ears and brain don't qualify as the right equipment to hear/detect "sound" in this frequency range.
is not a complete statement,UNDERPOWERING CABS IS A MYTH
Yes -there is such a thing as underpowering. Having an amp with less power than you need for certain gigs is a performance limitation. Having too much amp power is like having a car with a big engine - most of the time you don't need it; but when you want or need to go fast, there is no substitute for power.