• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ok so everybody likes blocks and binding

Dots and binding, yay or nay?

  • yay

    Votes: 119 44.2%
  • nay

    Votes: 60 22.3%
  • meh

    Votes: 90 33.5%

  • Total voters
    269
dots and binding? how about diamonds and binding?
P1010273.jpg


or triangles and binding?

P1010022.jpg

.

and blocks and binding, ya I got one of those also:
scott.jpg

.
on the topic...dots and binding? ..don't have one ( yet ) :D
 
Here's how I see it FWIW:
Perfect example is the pic of the two Js above.
The contrast of a block + bound 'board matches the stark contrast of the black body with the white guard.
The darker burst finish with a black or similarly dark guard seems to fit more with a dot neck with no binding, blends together better as a whole.

Another example: a bound body (Gibson guitar, Rickenbacker, etc.) pretty much demands a bound and blocked 'board, aesthetically speaking.

In other words, it's a case by case issue keeping in mind the aesthetics of the whole package.
 
Mouthwatering.

Bleh...more like Anus Lathering.



There ya go, that's why I don't like blocks & binding...because even a pristine 60's Fender Jazz reminds me of a POS Asian import like this bass when it gets all blocked & bound. Too tacky imho.

A swanky Gibson guitar (like a Les Paul Custom, ES-355TDSV, or L-5S), sure...but on a bass? Just Say No.