• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ok, so what bass evolution do you actually want?

Okay, I’ll go - BTW if any company incorporates these ideas, you need to hire me at an executive level with corresponding compensation.

1) Improved ergonomics: specifically, I’d like to see a company look at anatomical measurements and either have a customized approach, or one based upon a few different “sizes” of different body parts to create an instrument that is truly optimized for comfort and playing ease. 34” has its drawbacks. So does 30”. Don’t know if 32” is the magic number, but someone needs to approach it from the angle of what works for the human body. This also goes for neck width. In the upright world, Upton has made the observation that a thinner neck reduces your ability to stretch your fingers — again, there is an optimum balance here that I know someone has yet to try to achieve in a scientific manner. Create some sort of technology or tool to allow people to figure out what works for their body, and then sell them a bass that really fits.

2) Improved lightness: We have all sorts of space age technologies and materials. While the entire guitar doesn’t need to be made out of carbon fiber, let’s see some really innovative approaches to reducing weight without negative side effects. Maybe it’s an all wood guitar - maybe it’s a hybrid of wood and other materials. Maybe there’s only a wood fingerboard.

3) Single tree instruments: in the world of Scotch, you have single malts. In the wine industry, you have single vineyard, or even single block wines. Bring for a guitar made out of a single tree, provide the buyer with documentation of that tree, where it grew, etc. as well as the replacement tree(s) that were planted. Honor the tree that went into the instrument and create something that is so unique that each instrument is a real work of art.

4) Truly solve the problem of hum: Seriously, no excuse. Use a phantom coil if you need to, but there’s no other musical item we’d tolerate this with.

5) Flexible pickup configurations: Why am I stuck with pickups in a single configuration, of fixed type, and in fixed positions. I want to be able to quickly hot-swap and move my pickups around. Create a rails system, quick disconnects, and some interesting routing. Hell, make each pickup battery powered and wireless, and then let me dock them on a magnetic wireless charger.

6) Onboard recording: allow us to record the sound and then reamp it as needed without any external devices. Hell, through in some sort of MIDI logging as well.

7) Onboard effects: why bring pedals? Incorporate technology to allow effects to be handled within the instrument itself.


That’s literally just off the top of my head. If I actually think hard, I can probably double the list.
 
My basses are fine. What I want are appliances that don’t break after only a couple of years! :rage:

Unfortunately the market outvoted you, and people wanted appliances that are stylish and inexpensive.

Hell, if you need to replace the wire drawers on your dishwasher, you’re almost better off buying a new one. Same as if your front loader develops a leak after about 5 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bass12
Apparently people don't like the evolution or lack thereof with fender and keisel, but....

What do you actually want?

At some point, the bass has to still be a playable bass.

There is that bass with the half fretted, half fretless that's an interesting evolution, but nobody bought it...

Headless basses are a thing to some, but heavily divisive....

P/j, p/mm, j/mm are all combos of other basses...

People hated gibson's robot tuning guitar...

So, what do you people actually want?

A bass that looks, plays, and sounds exactly like an Alembic, but only costs about $500.
 
  • Like
Reactions: legalbass
Oh yah, I mean, they have 5ers now and regardless of what you think of them String Cheese Incident could and mostly still can sell out any venue they please with Michael Kang on a 5 string violin at the helm.

One of my best friends lives in Colorado and Loooooves cheese (and I’ll admit they’re a HECK of a fun time live) and he’s found some solid success playing the 5 string violin in a jazzy rock sorta band.

People keep saying this as if violins didn’t change over the course of music history.
 
I’d like a P bass with the option for empress, alder, ash or mahogany body at 7-8 lbs, options for 57, 58, 59, 62, or 63 RI pickup, plus the option for a G&L sounding MFD precision pickup, option for ebony fretboard, option for lacquer or thin coat urethane a la Cappola in any Fender color, option for a jazz profile neck, tone pot similar to Tonestyler, tapered tuning shafts, A string extender, that’s $1500.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zie
Okay, I'll play.
A bass with multiscale neck that has a torzal twist.
The pickup is a massive block with loads of pole pieces, Able to emulate the classic configurations (All J configurations, P configuration, MM, Ric and anything else you might think of).
The whole thing stays well below 8lbs.
Either in the bass, or in a pedal, or in a box to set on top of the amp is technology to control the bass and preamp to recall several presets. So you can have a P bass on one song, a Stingray on the next and a J with the tone rolled off after that - you can even connect it to a bass and 'record' its sound - sort of like a Kemper, only for instruments instead of amps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: g-dude
maybe a built-in tuner with a 10yr lithium battery...no pedal, no rack-mount and clip-on bs....cant think of anything else really..am happy with just playing it without excess junk making it overly technical for a piece of wood/metal and simple microphones to catch vibrating wires we call "flats"....keep it simple:D
 
People keep saying this as if violins didn’t change over the course of music history.

I didn't say never, but not for centuries, and most of the changes have been either cosmetic, or for minor changes in tone. No where near the same as people asking for different necks, bridges, pickups, number of strings, etc. as with basses
 
I want a MusicMan to come out with a Stingray 5HS, neck thru with a rosewood fret board with white MOP blocks, in translucent cherry red (matching headstock) with a black pick guard, smoked or gunmetal hardware, under 9 pounds, and want them to FIX THAT G STRING that slips off the neck at the 12th fret.

And I don't want to pay $3000 for it. (ya say ya wanna evolution?)
Hello? Mr. Ball?

I would settle for a 4 string MM with something better than a dumbass round pick guard.
 
I think we are conflating evolution with revolution. Evolution is things like improved pickups better finishes and refining design details.

what is being discussed here is revolutionary designs.

Generally revolutionary products don’t do well. Of course occasionally someone discovers a much better design. But most designs that are revolutionary are just companies looking to make a splash and standout. It doesn’t usually end well. For a non bass example google the Snauwert Ergonom.