Thanks, but I really didn't need to see that...
I'm just getting over seeing this earlier while looking at used gear...
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
One knob... I like it.
- Thread starter Marko 1
- Start date
I'm just getting over seeing this earlier while looking at used gear...
I used one of these regularly for several years until it died. I wish a company with the resources to make a small class D power amp at less than boutique prices would come out with something like this again.
One of the wilder fuzz pedals I own is a Frost Giant "Little Acid Fuzz" based on the 70s EHX Little Big Muff. One knob of glory.
No knobs. Looks like it though. Unused Speaker outs, power toggle and fuse cap.
That's backwards.The OP keeps his master up and works the gain for volume because he likes it clean.
That said, from what I can tell, the OP is actually kinda smart.
Keeping the master vol at a high setting corresponds with the input gain being at a lower setting to reach a given volume level, so what he said is true...it's going to be cleaner that way than the "gain higher/master volume lower" configuration.
Passinwind
I know nothing.
- Dec 3, 2003
- 23,087
- 46,071
- Disclosures
- Designer/Toaster Tech @ Passinwind Electronics
Assuming you don't crank the input gain into overload in the latter case, the first way will typically have lower distortion but a worse signal/noise ratio. So it depends on your definition of "clean."
Good point. I was thinking in terms of distortion, not signal-to-noise ratio.
Poster: I think it was wise for the carpenter to choose a heavier hammer since he'll be driving large spikes all day.Assuming you don't crank the input gain into overload in the latter case, the first way will typically have lower distortion but a worse signal/noise ratio. So it depends on your definition of "clean."
Smart guy: ASSUMING he doesn't bludgen himself in the head with it which will result in a severe concussion...
Last edited:
We can get into technicals and theoreticals all day...
or we can assume the guy is also considering the other factors and has that worked out.
Geeezz...
Passinwind
I know nothing.
- Dec 3, 2003
- 23,087
- 46,071
- Disclosures
- Designer/Toaster Tech @ Passinwind Electronics
Poster: I think it was wise for the carpenter to choose a heavier hammer since he'll be driving large spikes all day.
@Passinwind: ASSUMING he doesn't bludgen himself in the head with it which will result in a severe concussion...
What's the best waffle headed framing hammer for Metalz, my man? I know you like it BIG, but how big?
What's the best waffle headed framing hammer for Metalz, my man? I know you like it BIG, but how big?
Ignoring for the moment @Passinwind 's point about optimizing signal-to-noise ratio with gain adjustment and focusing only on "clean" as meaning "not distorting audibly:"
I think the purpose of the gain knob is to adjust the gain level at the amp's input, thus affecting subsequent amplification stages in the preamp AND power amp. Keep raising that control, early in the signal path as it is, and you will begin to introduce audible distortion at one or more subsequent points along the signal path. Even at fairly low volume levels, if the master volume (or power amp sensitivity control) is set low.
Whereas the master volume is affecting power amp sensitivity, but not circuitry upstream of the power amp. So setting that high, or wide open, allows reaching comparatively higher volume levels (without introducing distortion upstream of the power amp), by introducing less gain early in the signal path.
Does that differ from your understanding of what gain knobs and master volumes do? If so, how?
Last edited:
I believe you described it pretty well. But the actual purpose of a gain control is to set the level of the signal from the input to the pre-amp. I find that it works well for introducing grit into the signal be running it higher and reducing volume as needed.
I am questioning how that works for him. It sound contradictory to factors that have worked out for me.
And, no need to be rude.
Signal chain theory is fine but when you create a gumbo of specific pieces of equipment the "rules" need to be taken with a grain of salt. Assuming no blatant stupidity that'll damage anything your ears are the most important part of getting gain structure right.
