TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
you try to make an analogy with "illegal labor" in all your replies, even when the post you're replying to doesn't have anything to do with it (he speaks about new technologies and you reply with illegal labor?! what?!)
but what I'd like to know: what part of the live musique business does have something that you would qualify as "illegal labor"?
now I completely lost you ^^
it may be because of my "level" of english that I don't get it... but what did you get out of my nickname? oO (coming from my first name "Jérémie")
My bad. Looked to me like you were a DJ.
To answer your question ( and I can't believe so many of you do not see the parallel here) Illegal's come into this country and work for far less than what anyone else can afford to work for. They don't pay taxes, they don't contribute to the economy and greedy people hire them to save a buck. This all HURTS the industry and it HURTS the economy. Now, when bands are willing to play for free, it makes it harder for working bands to charge reasonable fees to play a show. It HURTS the industry. It devalues what musicians do, the same as illegal labor devalues the industries it thrives in, which these days is a heck of a lot more than roofing, grass cutting and nannying.![]()
All this proves is guy number 3 has been sniffing too many paint fumes.No one is "stealing" gigs from anyone, they are not yours and you don't own them.
You guys that are in the "buisiness" of music, have to remember that you're in a business. Lets take your EXACT argument but put in another business scenario and see what happens...........
Lets say that I own an autobody shop. I'm very good at what I do and my work is superior to many of the competing shops.
I charge $4000 to paint a car and my cars look phenominal and the paint hold up well over time.
Maaco across town charges $2000 to paint a car. Their paint jobs don't look nearly as good as mine, they fade and peel over the years, but the average joe can't really see the difference when the car rolls out of the shop, and their customers seem happy with what they got.
Are they taking my business? No, they may be hurting my business to an extent, but I don't own the cars I'm painting. The car owner has the right to choose either shop.
Chances are AT LEAST half of the Maaco customers probably wouldn't pay $4000 for a paint job to begin with.
Then there's this third guy, who has a passion for painting cars and does it on the weekends in his garage as a hobby. He does amazing work, and does it because he loves cars and loves painting. Is he taking my customers? No, again people have a right in a free market to choose where they paint their car, and how much they want to spend on the job.
ALL THREE PEOPLE HAVE THE SAME RIGHT TO RUN THEIR AUTO BODY SHOP, it's called free market!
Now, let's take it up a notch. Let's say that your shop was the only one on your hometown when you opened it. For years and years you were sucessful and your business was growing. Then ten years into it, Maaco opened up and your business took a substantial dip. Then five years later the hobbyist started painting on the side, and maybe you take another small dip. So then what? You go on an auto body chat forum and complain because these guys are taking your paint jobs away from you?????????
All we have in a free market society is the OPPORTUNITY, nothing else is guaranteed, except the fact that you are virtually guaranteed competition. You have a right to start your business but it's a gamble. You have no guarantee to prosper, no guarantee that another company will come a long and undercut you, and no other guarantees period.
You guys that are in working cover bands, or working hired guns or whatever, guess what? YOU'RE IN A FREE MARKET BUSINESS, DEAL WITH IT OR GET OUT! No one is taking your gigs, you don't own them and there is no entitlement.
Are you?I'm with you on the illegals or shall we say "undoccumented workers"having a terrible impact on jobs, wages and our econmy, but comparing my original rock band (which by the way can hold our own with just about anybody) is just a bad comparison and clouds up the issue.
Afterall, it's not as if club owners get us at a discount because we don't have a legit SS number! Besides, are you paying taxes on your gig income?????????????? It's not a job to me, I don't view it as work, nor do I care to.
When your business is anothers art or hobby, that is something the business man has to deal with, get over it! (see post #163)
You are missing a critical difference, between fungible labor and specialized labor. Most jobs taken by illegal immigrants (not only in the US, by the way) is unskilled fungible labor. Musical performance should be highly specialized artistry. A good band should provide a unique performance experience, which means that they cannot be replaced by just anyone willing to show up. If a professional band is getting edged out by hobbyists playing for free, that professional band should seek a client base which appreciates it's added value or it should take a hard look at what (if anything) makes that band special. If I were losing clients to lawyers working for free, I would first look at what I'm doing wrong before I would blame the other guys.
All thids proves is guy number 3 has been sniffing too many paint fumes.If he has a decent product he should charge for it because his time and supplies are not free.
Are you?
I understand your point, but I think you over-simplify the problem. I date back to the glory days before pay-for-play, and I can list lots of other factors that have devalued live music, especially on the bar scene. Just for starters:
- declining standards amongst professional musicians (just read other threads on TB for countless examples of outlandish, un-businesslike, customer-unfriendly behaviour on the job)
- the failure of the AF of M to act aggressively to protect our market, and their historic bias towards symphony and session players
- savvy marketing by cut-rate clubs offering second-rate entertainment without cover charges, at the expense of venues that were serious about promoting a viable environment for local and regional artists
- the advent of DJ's, rappers, karaoke and a host of other sources of "live" entertainment
- changing consumer tastes, and the explosion of electronic and other entertainment media, further eroding the market for live music
- the influx of cheap, relatively high-quality offshore instruments and gear, lowering the bar for amateurs (musicians and club owners alike) looking to get into the business
Anything over $599.00 yearly I am. No it is not my job, but it is work and I deserve to be paid for it.
You were not who I intended the post for.I also work in the construction industry. With the housing crash business has been slow and many businesses in my area went under. I make a good portion of my income from music and pay taxes on it every year. It is a fun job and beats pounding nails.
Those who equate hobbyists playing for free to illegal immigrant workers are missing a critical difference between fungible labor and specialized labor. Most jobs taken by illegal immigrants (not only in the US, by the way) is unskilled fungible labor. Musical performance should be highly specialized artistry. A good band should provide a unique performance experience, which means that they cannot be replaced by just anyone willing to show up. If a professional band is getting edged out by hobbyists playing for free, that professional band should seek a client base which appreciates it's added value or it should take a hard look at what (if anything) makes that band special. If I were losing clients to lawyers working for free, I would first look at what I'm doing wrong before I would blame the other guys.