• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Partial refund on a damaged bass, should I accept?

Would you

  • Keep it, take the $50

    Votes: 11 4.9%
  • Send it back

    Votes: 162 72.6%
  • Ask for more $$

    Votes: 50 22.4%

  • Total voters
    223
There's no way that occurred during shipping.

...that dog don't hunt

Now if the bass were in a showroom/rehearsal type space, where various people played it....it looks like the bass was repeatedly picked up and set down on a stand that had an unpadded area.
 
Unless it was disclosed/photographed in the listing, I'd expect $50 off if it arrived with one of those dents in it. That thing looks like it's been hit with a hammer 42 times. It if were me, I'd send it back.
 
That’s a definite no from me.

Only way I’m ok with damage like that is if I caused it.

Legends are not very rare, unless it’s a certain color or combination you just gotta have.

Attempts at repair are likely to be too expensive or could even make it worse without a total refin.

Ship it back and show them how to properly pack a bass, because if we don’t teach them, they shall never learn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueTalon
I'm probably the only one on the fence, since you said the bass actually had chips on it it had to have been marked as a players bass already?
Correct. I knew it was not a showroom piece and I got it for a good price. But, I would not have bought it if I knew of the extra damage. Damage that supposedly happened in transit. The original ad shows front and back pretty well, and has close-ups of the other imperfections (a few chips in the neck and headstock). There were no pics of the sides so you can't tell if the "new" damage was already present.
 
Correct. I knew it was not a showroom piece and I got it for a good price. But, I would not have bought it if I knew of the extra damage. Damage that supposedly happened in transit. The original ad shows front and back pretty well, and has close-ups of the other imperfections (a few chips in the neck and headstock). There were no pics of the sides so you can't tell if the "new" damage was already present.
Yeah, seller is a liar and hid the damage hoping to sell it to a schmuck who will take 50 bucks to keep it. Send back and get a full refund.
 
Easy bass to find, you probably wouldn't have bought it if you knew the damage was there. Especially the neck damage, if you're like me. I would return and find another. Seller knew the damage was there before selling and doing the bait and switch.
 
Attention to detail is paramount..in life. However, there are tons of people who lack attention to detail. Every time I've sold on eBay since 2006, my old Reverb account, and here on TB, I take far too many photos. I even take personal videos for eBay sales. Then I send a boat load of packaging photos so the buyer can see exactly how it's packaged. Then I send photos of the condition of the box from all angles and every side, so the buyer can see the box before it leaves. This should be a standard, but there's a lot of people who don't care, or have no experience selling, let alone selling a large expensive item. As a buyer you should also be very meticulous and don't "settle". If the photos aren't high quality, and there aren't many photos...if the seller lacks communication...etc etc.

That damage is ridiculous.

Be OCD with this stuff.