I'm all for artistic integrity. I try hard to be true to myself and my vision. As Damon pointed out, we each do things a certain way because we think it is the best way. I totally agree. I have a problem when the ideas of artistic integrity and intellectual superiority become synonymous. They are not.
Yes, but some music puts more value on intellectual content than others.
I am thinking of Xennakis' high math concepts, Stockhausen, Cecil Taylor, etc.
Others just want to play music eveyone will like, and some go to great lengths to not make it intelectual.
Just as some musics value virtuosity more than others.
I prefer a Xenakis Piece to a pop song in every way, content, intent, sound, texture, etc.
That is just me and what I value. I value musicians and artists who are
trying to push boundries of forms, virtuosity, sonic possibilties.
I prefer that to rock and pop songwriting regardless of how well crafted and witty it is.
Like I said it is personal. In my personal value system, Costello ranks far below Peacock, end of story.
It does not mean I think he should have his identity erased in some Stalineque way, I just don't get anything from what he does.