Yeah, I think whatever you build it's gotta be relatively period correct. Otherwise it just doesn't flow most of the time. Though there are exceptions.I never cared for the Foose touch.... big wheels, shaved door handles, sidemarkers etc.... no thanks.
I prefer the Mike N touch.... stock body, faded and/or chipped paint and a mountain motor under the hood.![]()
While it's nice to have some modern touches like EFI and high performance disc brakes on a classic car, taking a classic and turning it into a completely modern car is a bit too much for my taste.
To me, the appeal of older cars is their relative simplicity. Back then you could get a decent V8 RWD car without having to pay for the myriad obligatory luxury options not necessarily useful. I don't need me lane keeping assistants and automatic parking. Just give me a decent car with a decent powerplant and drivetrain, Spacious, nicely appointed yet simple interior devoid of too many screens and sensors.
Just recently I saw a review of the new aston martin and that car has a MOTORIZED GLOVEBOX! It actually takes 5X more time to wait for the motor to slide it open than it would take to open it yourself. Why did they even bother? Tech is great, but tech for it's own sake is just dumb.
Last edited: