• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Praise Report: GHS Precision Flats

Do these have purple silks at the tuner end, no ball end silks, and are super smooth to the touch.

They came on a late 80's Fender I got. It would be kinda awesome if they were nearly 30 years old like the bass.
 
Do these have purple silks at the tuner end, no ball end silks, and are super smooth to the touch.

They came on a late 80's Fender I got. It would be kinda awesome if they were nearly 30 years old like the bass.

They are purple silked only at the tuner end, and are super smooth.

Can't verify the age of the ones on the Fender you have, but I'm sure they're at least a little well seasoned.
 
Just a couple of quick questions. What GHS Flats size should I get for my American Fender Pbass. Will be my first set of flats and just wanna make sure they fit how they should with string through bridge. Two, can these strings cop the tone from Summer Madness by kool and the gang? Thanks

Kool Video link-->Invalid Link Removed
 
Just a couple of quick questions. What GHS Flats size should I get for my American Fender Pbass. Will be my first set of flats and just wanna make sure they fit how they should with string through bridge. Two, can these strings cop the tone from Summer Madness by kool and the gang? Thanks

Kool Video link-->Invalid Link Removed

That sure sounds like stock Fender Flats, and that is exactly what Fender put on all their basses back then. Fender didn't even have roundwound bass strings in 1974. The dilemma for you is what sounds most like old school Fender Flats. LaBella's sure don't. D'Addario Chromes are the exact opposite of what you want. GHS Precision Flats do come close. I actually think I'd try a new set of Fender Flats first and see how they sound. I'm sure they'd be usable/passable. Just use standard guage 0.45-0.105 long scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CentralCoastBass
That sure sounds like stock Fender Flats, and that is exactly what Fender put on all their basses back then. Fender didn't even have roundwound bass strings in 1974. The dilemma for you is what sounds most like old school Fender Flats. LaBella's sure don't. D'Addario Chromes are the exact opposite of what you want. GHS Precision Flats do come close. I actually think I'd try a new set of Fender Flats first and see how they sound. I'm sure they'd be usable/passable. Just use standard guage 0.45-0.105 long scale.

hm. Fender's flatwound strings have their own sound, but some people compare them to Chromes. Meanwhile, La Bella's 760M set, "Original 1954 Fender Style Flat Wound", "heard on nearly every Motown album from the '60s" might sound more like old school Fender flats than you would think.
 
I think the current Fenders are closer the Chromes than they are different. Tension wise, they feel almost identical, IMO. The Fenders are slightly brighter and have a more burnished type finishing to them, but the differences stop there, IMO.

I don't think the GHS are anything remotely like Chromes or Fenders and I personally think that's a good thing;)
 
Since yesterday I have the GHS Precision flats on my 2012 MIA Preci. They sound so beautiful! Only the E string seems to be a little dull, will that even out later on?

Apart from that, I have strung them through the body and as the E string is quite long the thick part is wounded around the tuner post. There is still silk, so no naked string on the post. Is that OK, soundwise and technically?

Is it also OK with the end of the E string pointing a little bit to the A string?

THX

IMG_1831.jpg

IMG_1832.jpg
 
Since yesterday I have the GHS Precision flats on my 2012 MIA Preci. They sound so beautiful! Only the E string seems to be a little dull, will that even out later on?



Apart from that, I have strung them through the body and as the E string is quite long the thick part is wounded around the tuner post. There is still silk, so no naked string on the post. Is that OK, soundwise and technically?



Is it also OK with the end of the E string pointing a little bit to the A string?



THX



View attachment 405274



View attachment 405275


They have a 38" winding, so are ideal for string-through bodies on 34" scale basses. You will be fine with how it's strung and shouldn't have any issues. And yes, if you read Linnin's original post, the E string will balance out with the other strings as they settle.
 
Hey Mr. GHS dude, just out of curiosity...

Since there seems to be a revival of the Fender VI/Eastwood guitars Sidejack Bass VI instruments of late, how difficult would it be for someone to get a set of these Precisions? Would there be a way to custom order a set?
 
I have tried many many different flatwound brands over the years, and these are it for me. They are stiff, and they will demolish your fingertips and hands after two long sets, but hey...MAN UP and stick with 'em, they rule, like a thoroughbred stallion...worth the ride IF you can stay on!
Really? I keep seeing comments that these strings are high tension, but to me, they feel very slinky, floppy, even.

I had some Fender 9050CLs on my Jazz bass before and they were doing a number on my neck. These babies are quite easy to play. In fact, if I say so myself, they make me want to play even more because they're so easy on the fingers.

As a lefty, I used to think that because Squier (in the Vintage Modified or Classic Vibe lines) had no available P-bass models, I'd have to stick to a Jazz and made do without the punch and bottom. With these strings and finger position at the neck with both pups full up, I've discovered my fears were completely unjustified.

These strings sound so good, oftentimes, I just boost the volume a little on my direct in and use that, instead of an amp or virtual amp. Couldn't do that with the Fenders or the Chromes without getting some metal grit.
 
Since yesterday I have the GHS Precision flats on my 2012 MIA Preci. They sound so beautiful! Only the E string seems to be a little dull, will that even out later on?

Apart from that, I have strung them through the body and as the E string is quite long the thick part is wounded around the tuner post. There is still silk, so no naked string on the post. Is that OK, soundwise and technically?

Is it also OK with the end of the E string pointing a little bit to the A string?

THX

View attachment 405274

View attachment 405275

If ever you were to put this set on a top-loader, the trick is to use a decent amount of super crazy glue right at the end of the silk and naked string (well, do this before putting the strings on the bass), let it dry for about 30 mins, then wind as you would usually. The way you wound your strings is perfectly fine... in fact, there's not really any other way to do it! I have these strings on my Squier VM Jazz and it looks like this:

IMG_0502.jpg


IMG_0501.jpg


IMG_0504.jpg
 
Really? I keep seeing comments that these strings are high tension, but to me, they feel very slinky, floppy, even.

I had some Fender 9050CLs on my Jazz bass before and they were doing a number on my neck. These babies are quite easy to play. In fact, if I say so myself, they make me want to play even more because they're so easy on the fingers.

As a lefty, I used to think that because Squier (in the Vintage Modified or Classic Vibe lines) had no available P-bass models, I'd have to stick to a Jazz and made do without the punch and bottom. With these strings and finger position at the neck with both pups full up, I've discovered my fears were completely unjustified.



These strings sound so good, oftentimes, I just boost the volume a little on my direct in and use that, instead of an amp or virtual amp. Couldn't do that with the Fenders or the Chromes without getting some metal grit.



I read a review in which the 3050's (.055-.105) were lighter in tension than the Fender 9050CL's......not true! I had to tighten my truss rod 1/4 turn. I would bet that the M3050's would be loosesr than the 9050's.
 
Really? I keep seeing comments that these strings are high tension, but to me, they feel very slinky, floppy, even.


That would be the difference between tension and feel. I've played stiffer feeling flats that had less tension than the P Flats I've used (that have been higher tension). Tension and feel aren't completely related.
 
That would be the difference between tension and feel. I've played stiffer feeling flats that had less tension than the P Flats I've used (that have been higher tension). Tension and feel aren't completely related.

Very correct! Tension is the amount of force in pounds to bring the string to pitch. It's science. "Feel" is totally subjective, and while it is non-science, it is still very important to the bass player. We don't play or make science. We are artists and make music. Touch/Feel is every bit as important as Tone/Sound. Science is a tool to be used, not an alter of worship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRT64
That would be the difference between tension and feel. I've played stiffer feeling flats that had less tension than the P Flats I've used (that have been higher tension). Tension and feel aren't completely related.
Maybe... but I didn't feel like I needed to crank and crank these babies to pitch all that much, nor did I feel like I had to work them in excessively so they could hold tune. My pegs, bushings and neck aren't having nearly as much of a hard time with them as they did with my Fenders.

And when I say slinky and floppy, I'm not just going by feel, but the fact that if I'm not careful, my E string ends up bending off the fretboard. Or whatever it is you call that when you mis-fret. I think tension, or lack thereof does factor in there somewhere...

OTOH, I know a guy who put these on his MiM P-bass, and I tried them, and they are way stiffer.
 
Very correct! Tension is the amount of force in pounds to bring the string to pitch. It's science. "Feel" is totally subjective, and while it is non-science, it is still very important to the bass player. We don't play or make science. We are artists and make music. Touch/Feel is every bit as important as Tone/Sound. Science is a tool to be used, not an alter of worship.

Very true. Tension plays A factor in the string, but is not THE factor.

Case in point: take a Fender bass and wrap the E or A string on the tuning post from bottom to the top (as in, completely backwards from what we're supposed to) and then play it. Listen to how it sounds, take note of how it feels, etc..

Now, wrap that string on the tuning post correct and note the difference in tone and feel.

The one thing that didn't change? The tension. And yet, we have two completely different experiences.


I think tension, or lack thereof does factor in there somewhere...

I'll reiterate my above comment. Tension plays A factor in the string, but is not THE factor. Lots more going on that all effect the final outcome that are usually not thought of.
 
That sure sounds like stock Fender Flats, and that is exactly what Fender put on all their basses back then. Fender didn't even have roundwound bass strings in 1974. The dilemma for you is what sounds most like old school Fender Flats. LaBella's sure don't. D'Addario Chromes are the exact opposite of what you want. GHS Precision Flats do come close. I actually think I'd try a new set of Fender Flats first and see how they sound. I'm sure they'd be usable/passable. Just use standard guage 0.45-0.105 long scale.

Thanks for the suggestion. Seems Ill probably just have to play through a few different types to find what Im looking for. Guess Im in no hurry so Ill take the time to sample a few sets. Think Ill get some recordings done while Im at it for comparisons sake. IS there an estimated break in period for all flats,Ill probably be playing through them around 5hrs a week. Thanks.