Is the GHS PF E string supposed to be thuddy and deadish right out of the box?
Read Post #1 and most of your questions will be answered.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Is the GHS PF E string supposed to be thuddy and deadish right out of the box?

Read Post #1 and most of your questions will be answered.![]()
Do these have purple silks at the tuner end, no ball end silks, and are super smooth to the touch.
They came on a late 80's Fender I got. It would be kinda awesome if they were nearly 30 years old like the bass.
Just a couple of quick questions. What GHS Flats size should I get for my American Fender Pbass. Will be my first set of flats and just wanna make sure they fit how they should with string through bridge. Two, can these strings cop the tone from Summer Madness by kool and the gang? Thanks
Kool Video link-->Invalid Link Removed
That sure sounds like stock Fender Flats, and that is exactly what Fender put on all their basses back then. Fender didn't even have roundwound bass strings in 1974. The dilemma for you is what sounds most like old school Fender Flats. LaBella's sure don't. D'Addario Chromes are the exact opposite of what you want. GHS Precision Flats do come close. I actually think I'd try a new set of Fender Flats first and see how they sound. I'm sure they'd be usable/passable. Just use standard guage 0.45-0.105 long scale.


Since yesterday I have the GHS Precision flats on my 2012 MIA Preci. They sound so beautiful! Only the E string seems to be a little dull, will that even out later on?
Apart from that, I have strung them through the body and as the E string is quite long the thick part is wounded around the tuner post. There is still silk, so no naked string on the post. Is that OK, soundwise and technically?
Is it also OK with the end of the E string pointing a little bit to the A string?
THX
View attachment 405274
View attachment 405275
Really? I keep seeing comments that these strings are high tension, but to me, they feel very slinky, floppy, even.I have tried many many different flatwound brands over the years, and these are it for me. They are stiff, and they will demolish your fingertips and hands after two long sets, but hey...MAN UP and stick with 'em, they rule, like a thoroughbred stallion...worth the ride IF you can stay on!
Since yesterday I have the GHS Precision flats on my 2012 MIA Preci. They sound so beautiful! Only the E string seems to be a little dull, will that even out later on?
Apart from that, I have strung them through the body and as the E string is quite long the thick part is wounded around the tuner post. There is still silk, so no naked string on the post. Is that OK, soundwise and technically?
Is it also OK with the end of the E string pointing a little bit to the A string?
THX
View attachment 405274
View attachment 405275
Really? I keep seeing comments that these strings are high tension, but to me, they feel very slinky, floppy, even.
I had some Fender 9050CLs on my Jazz bass before and they were doing a number on my neck. These babies are quite easy to play. In fact, if I say so myself, they make me want to play even more because they're so easy on the fingers.
As a lefty, I used to think that because Squier (in the Vintage Modified or Classic Vibe lines) had no available P-bass models, I'd have to stick to a Jazz and made do without the punch and bottom. With these strings and finger position at the neck with both pups full up, I've discovered my fears were completely unjustified.
These strings sound so good, oftentimes, I just boost the volume a little on my direct in and use that, instead of an amp or virtual amp. Couldn't do that with the Fenders or the Chromes without getting some metal grit.
Really? I keep seeing comments that these strings are high tension, but to me, they feel very slinky, floppy, even.
That would be the difference between tension and feel. I've played stiffer feeling flats that had less tension than the P Flats I've used (that have been higher tension). Tension and feel aren't completely related.
Maybe... but I didn't feel like I needed to crank and crank these babies to pitch all that much, nor did I feel like I had to work them in excessively so they could hold tune. My pegs, bushings and neck aren't having nearly as much of a hard time with them as they did with my Fenders.That would be the difference between tension and feel. I've played stiffer feeling flats that had less tension than the P Flats I've used (that have been higher tension). Tension and feel aren't completely related.
Very correct! Tension is the amount of force in pounds to bring the string to pitch. It's science. "Feel" is totally subjective, and while it is non-science, it is still very important to the bass player. We don't play or make science. We are artists and make music. Touch/Feel is every bit as important as Tone/Sound. Science is a tool to be used, not an alter of worship.
I think tension, or lack thereof does factor in there somewhere...
That sure sounds like stock Fender Flats, and that is exactly what Fender put on all their basses back then. Fender didn't even have roundwound bass strings in 1974. The dilemma for you is what sounds most like old school Fender Flats. LaBella's sure don't. D'Addario Chromes are the exact opposite of what you want. GHS Precision Flats do come close. I actually think I'd try a new set of Fender Flats first and see how they sound. I'm sure they'd be usable/passable. Just use standard guage 0.45-0.105 long scale.