TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That's how I feel also. I think any bass with 2 of the same pickups demonstrates this quite well.but IMO placement is probably more critical to the sound than the pup itself.
I have that in my $115 OLP with a $20 Wilkinson P added in. I have over a dozen basses at the moment and this setup always kills it. I just love this setup, passive too. 1 volume, 1 blend, nothing else. Bridge in parallel. Coil choices on the MM would be nice but I could go back and do every gig and recording from my entire life with this setup without complaining.Right now, I would do a P/MM. The MM right in it's sweet spot, the P smooshed right up on it.
Interesting... Could you explain this please?P...but reversed, for a more even tone and tighter lows.

Yeah but what's the difference between the two? What happens if you reverse the pickups?
Thanks!!The original way the E & A are closer to the neck and the D & G closer to the bridge. So the low strings are a bit deeper toned and the high strings a bit brighter giving a wide range of tone difference. Reversing it brightens the bass strings and deepens the high strings evening out the notes across the strings. Subtle, subject to taste. I prefer the original probably because I've listened to it that way all my life.
I voted P/J but I actually prefer a P and a Dual Coil. Specifically a Reversed P and a EMG DC
P vs reverse-P?
Be really interested to hear from any folk who have had basses both P and reverse-P what your experiences are and which you ended up going for?
On a double P, the reversing makes a huge difference on the bridge pickup. Not so much at the neck, but I like symmetry, so...
As for the original question, you left out a whole bunch of choices, but my current fave is three narrow-aperture humbuckers.