TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
JimmyM said:When I first got the REDDI, I figured I'd do both in venues where I could get two lines and the soundman wasn't a jerkoff. I love micing cabs and have traditionally not liked DI's. But I haven't really felt the need to mic cabs anymore. Somewhere in the advertising for the REDDI, there's a sentence that goes like, "The 1/4" out is untreated so you can run direct with the REDDI and have an untouched signal going to your amp for cab micing, and then you can erase the cab mic track when you hear that you don't need it." That's kind of how I feel about it, too. I mic'ed because I was looking for that level of balls that DI's weren't giving me. The REDDI gives it to me now, so I don't feel the need to mic like I used to.
The one thing I would still mic a cab for, though, is for distortion from a tube amp, but having said that, I'm very satisfied with how the REDDI handles distortion pedals as long as you cut highs past 5k. So I could go either way on that as well.
I know this reply is centered more around live work and not recording, but I think it still applies.
JimmyM said:Stuff like that is just a matter of finding the right EQ combinations for each sound. Or maybe it's turning one off in favor of the other and not worrying about blending.
JimmyM said:Really hard to say without being there, but if you'd like to fly me and the wife to Paris, I'll be happy to be help![]()
JimmyM said:I'd offer to have you just fly me, but if I went to Paris and didn't take my wife, guess who would come home to a divorce court summons?
![]()
Well Fritz...Well, that begs the question, Jimmy: What is your current signal chain when you include REDDI in it?