• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Richest bassist?

And to take this down a whole new demented road of pointless internet arguing, let me give you music school experts a little perspective...

I never cared for Frank Sinatra. When I was younger, I thought he was some old irrelevant lounge singer who got lucky. But as I studied the history of music, I realized just how much of an impact this old irrelevant lounge singer had on music and culture. Before he came along, big band singers were called the "boy singer" or "girl singer." They would meekly go up to the mic, sing their little song, and sit down while the band played an instrumental. The conductor was the big cheese, and the singer could have been anyone who could carry a tune because they were there to see the conductor and his band.

But Frank took over the stage like nobody before him. He had a charisma that was undeniable, and when he went up to sing his little song, you couldn't watch anything but him. It wasn't long before the singers started doing what he did and became the focus, not the conductor. And he was one of the very first high profile white singers to work with and sing songs written by black musicians, and through him, white people in America were introduced to the concept of cool that would never have heard of it otherwise, and his acceptance of them went a long way toward white America's growing acceptance of people other than themselves. So while I still think of him as a good but not great singer (I'm more of a Tony Bennett fan), there's no denying the huge musical and cultural impact the man had.

Same with the Beatles. They took all their favorite influences (including Frank Sinatra) and mixed them into a music totally unlike anything ever heard before. It had elements of all of it, but when it was poppy, it still rocked hard (for its day). Listen to huge pop acts right before the Beatles like Fabian and Bobby Rydell and see if they even came close. And they were the first band to have the musicians as personalities. In all other bands before, there was one member focused on and the rest were sidemen. But the Beatles were the first band you knew the drummer's name as readily as the lead singer's. And take a look at all the rock and pop music that's come since and you'll see a lot of roots back to the Beatles to this day. You'll see a lot of roots to Frank Sinatra, too. Sure, there are lots of other influences out there, but the hugeness of the Beatles and Frank Sinatra can't be denied, just like the influence of Duke Ellington, Nat King Cole, Chuck Berry, and the musicians of Motown can't be denied.

This little personal insight may not mean anything to you all right now, but in the future, when you decide to get past the "I don't like it so it can't be important" stage and look a little deeper into it, and you start to realize the impact the Beatles had, I hope you send me a thank-you note ;)

Great post and +1. Sinatra also had a HUGE impact on jazz instrumental soloists, since his phrasing and delivery were so unique.

Just as the young guys typically fail to see the 'big deal' with some of this old stuff, as an older guy, I try to work very hard to appreciate, understand, and incorporate the newer stuff that's out now that I don't particularly care for (all the different versions of rap, hip hop, etc., for example).

It's good to look back a bit if you are a player starting out, and to also force yourself to 'understand' and incorporate the stuff going on now if you are an older coot like me but still trying to work and stay relevant as a side-man in the business!
 
Just as the young guys typically fail to see the 'big deal' with some of this old stuff, as an older guy, I try to work very hard to appreciate, understand, and incorporate the newer stuff that's out now that I don't particularly care for (all the different versions of rap, hip hop, etc., for example).

Definitely something I need to work on. Was easier to do when my son was still at home as it was around all the time. Now, between work, rehearsals and life its much tougher.
 
+1 I think as the youths of today get older, their interest in other musics and music history in general begin to kick in. I had the liberty of growing up in a musical family so I had my history lessons right then and there! I also listen to quite a lot of todays music. Not that I like it all but I do prefer to have some frame of reference when discussing. I just like good pop songs. Doesn't matter what era it came from! The Beatles? Didn't care for them much although they do get my respect. The Beach Boys? Killer harmonies and much more appealing to me!

Back on topic..................now who is the richest bassist?? Did we determine that is indeed Sir Paul McCartney?
 
And to take this down a whole new demented road of pointless internet arguing, let me give you music school experts a little perspective...

I never cared for Frank Sinatra. When I was younger, I thought he was some old irrelevant lounge singer who got lucky. But as I studied the history of music, I realized just how much of an impact this old irrelevant lounge singer had on music and culture. Before he came along, big band singers were called the "boy singer" or "girl singer." They would meekly go up to the mic, sing their little song, and sit down while the band played an instrumental. The conductor was the big cheese, and the singer could have been anyone who could carry a tune because they were there to see the conductor and his band.

But Frank took over the stage like nobody before him. He had a charisma that was undeniable, and when he went up to sing his little song, you couldn't watch anything but him. It wasn't long before the singers started doing what he did and became the focus, not the conductor. And he was one of the very first high profile white singers to work with and sing songs written by black musicians, and through him, white people in America were introduced to the concept of cool that would never have heard of it otherwise, and his acceptance of them went a long way toward white America's growing acceptance of people other than themselves. So while I still think of him as a good but not great singer (I'm more of a Tony Bennett fan), there's no denying the huge musical and cultural impact the man had.

Same with the Beatles. They took all their favorite influences (including Frank Sinatra) and mixed them into a music totally unlike anything ever heard before. It had elements of all of it, but when it was poppy, it still rocked hard (for its day). Listen to huge pop acts right before the Beatles like Fabian and Bobby Rydell and see if they even came close. And they were the first band to have the musicians as personalities. In all other bands before, there was one member focused on and the rest were sidemen. But the Beatles were the first band you knew the drummer's name as readily as the lead singer's. And take a look at all the rock and pop music that's come since and you'll see a lot of roots back to the Beatles to this day. You'll see a lot of roots to Frank Sinatra, too. Sure, there are lots of other influences out there, but the hugeness of the Beatles and Frank Sinatra can't be denied, just like the influence of Duke Ellington, Nat King Cole, Chuck Berry, and the musicians of Motown can't be denied.

This little personal insight may not mean anything to you all right now, but in the future, when you decide to get past the "I don't like it so it can't be important" stage and look a little deeper into it, and you start to realize the impact the Beatles had, I hope you send me a thank-you note ;)

ahh finally, good argumentation that can change my mind.
 
+1 I think as the youths of today get older, their interest in other musics and music history in general begin to kick in. I had the liberty of growing up in a musical family so I had my history lessons right then and there! I also listen to quite a lot of todays music. Not that I like it all but I do prefer to have some frame of reference when discussing. I just like good pop songs. Doesn't matter what era it came from! The Beatles? Didn't care for them much although they do get my respect. The Beach Boys? Killer harmonies and much more appealing to me!

Back on topic..................now who is the richest bassist?? Did we determine that is indeed Sir Paul McCartney?

I haven't followed the entire thread, but I would think Bill Wyman is at least in the running. Not sure about the residuals he gets, and maybe since he didn't get songwriting credits on much of the stuff he might not be a mega rich cat, but I have a feeling he's up there.
 
I haven't followed the entire thread, but I would think Bill Wyman is at least in the running. Not sure about the residuals he gets, and maybe since he didn't get songwriting credits on much of the stuff he might not be a mega rich cat, but I have a feeling he's up there.

You're joking, right? You answered it yourself, he got no songwriting money and he quit the band before they started making huge money touring.

Now, DW, just once more to be clear, do you or do you not like the Beatles?
 
You're joking, right? You answered it yourself, he got no songwriting money and he quit the band before they started making huge money touring.

Now, DW, just once more to be clear, do you or do you not like the Beatles?
To be clear............not my cup of tea (although a couple of tunes have caught my ear over the years)! My general answer will be NO.
 
As I said before, we had our answer the first time his name was mentioned.

Yes but how could you be so sure? He didn't ask who the the richest, MOST FAMOUS, bassist was, he asked who the richest was period. He gave HIS two choices, for all we know the richest bassist may not have ever recorded one song, he/she might just be playing in a band somewere, so NO, we dont have our answer. There are hundreds of billionaires on the planet and I'm sure there are some that are musicians, so if you wanna get all nit-picky, there ya go. Again, I'm sure Sir Paul influenced a lot of people, but wouldn't it be apparent in the majority of music if he influenced the majority of bassist that exist like some here has implied? Michael Jackson and Prince both lists The Beatles and James brown as influences and it's very clear in both artists in some of their songwriting(elements of Paul) and their stage performances(elements of Brown). However in neither artist have I heard mention of them being fans of his bass playing, hell Michael has even recorded with Paul but saved the bass chores for Louis Johnson and Bobby Watson. Nobody argues his influence, just his influence on bassists.
 
Great post and +1. Sinatra also had a HUGE impact on jazz instrumental soloists, since his phrasing and delivery were so unique.

Just as the young guys typically fail to see the 'big deal' with some of this old stuff, as an older guy, I try to work very hard to appreciate, understand, and incorporate the newer stuff that's out now that I don't particularly care for (all the different versions of rap, hip hop, etc., for example).

It's good to look back a bit if you are a player starting out, and to also force yourself to 'understand' and incorporate the stuff going on now if you are an older coot like me but still trying to work and stay relevant as a side-man in the business!

I am the opposite. I am 18 and I have almost no interest in today's music. I play just Jazz Basses, listen mostly to bands that are at least 20 years old. New instruments, new kinds of music don't really interest me.
 
Yes but how could you be so sure? He didn't ask who the the richest, MOST FAMOUS, bassist was, he asked who the richest was period. He gave HIS two choices, for all we know the richest bassist may not have ever recorded one song, he/she might just be playing in a band somewere, so NO, we dont have our answer. There are hundreds of billionaires on the planet and I'm sure there are some that are musicians, so if you wanna get all nit-picky, there ya go. Again, I'm sure Sir Paul influenced a lot of people, but wouldn't it be apparent in the majority of music if he influenced the majority of bassist that exist like some here has implied? Michael Jackson and Prince both lists The Beatles and James brown as influences and it's very clear in both artists in some of their songwriting(elements of Paul) and their stage performances(elements of Brown). However in neither artist have I heard mention of them being fans of his bass playing, hell Michael has even recorded with Paul but saved the bass chores for Louis Johnson and Bobby Watson. Nobody argues his influence, just his influence on bassists.
Well, with all the gazzilions he made making The Matrix, Keanu Reeves may just be the richest bassist!
 
Well hell, with all the gazzilions he made making The Matrix, Keanu Reeves may just be the richest bassist!

+1 Good point you make. This thread is getting way to serious. Note to self: put this topic on the list of things not to get into a debate about with people. It will go next to religion, politics, abortion.....lol :hiding: ;) :bassist:

***the above mentioned was purely for entertainment purposes and in no way intended to start another debate off topic*** ;)
 
Yes but how could you be so sure? He didn't ask who the the richest, MOST FAMOUS, bassist was, he asked who the richest was period. He gave HIS two choices, for all we know the richest bassist may not have ever recorded one song, he/she might just be playing in a band somewere, so NO, we dont have our answer. There are hundreds of billionaires on the planet and I'm sure there are some that are musicians, so if you wanna get all nit-picky, there ya go. Again, I'm sure Sir Paul influenced a lot of people, but wouldn't it be apparent in the majority of music if he influenced the majority of bassist that exist like some here has implied? Michael Jackson and Prince both lists The Beatles and James brown as influences and it's very clear in both artists in some of their songwriting(elements of Paul) and their stage performances(elements of Brown). However in neither artist have I heard mention of them being fans of his bass playing, hell Michael has even recorded with Paul but saved the bass chores for Louis Johnson and Bobby Watson. Nobody argues his influence, just his influence on bassists.

You make a good point. For all I know Bill Gates plays bass. As for Paul's influence on bass player's I'm not so sure I follow your line of reasoning. Lots of bass players I've seen over the years (including guys like Jaco and Will Lee) list Macca as an influence.