• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

-Ritter Owners Club-

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here are some 'nicer' shots of 0927:

DSC_8291.jpg


DSC_8288.jpg


DSC_8262.gif


DSC_8282.jpg


DSC_8279.gif
 
I hate to be one to start trouble, but...
I have been doing some traveling with my Ritter, I carry it on the plane with me, needless to say it goes through security. Sometimes I get to see it go through the x-ray machine and for the life of me I can only see two coils under those wooden Triple Bucker covers... Also the placement of the truss rod kinda surprised me...
I asked Jens about that and the coils are stacked. If you look at it from the top, you will only see 2 rows.
Also, if an instrument has a low B, the truss rod isn't exactly in the middle.

Here are some 'nicer' shots of 0927:
Nice!!!!
 
^It doesn't seem like the tightest neck pocket on the B string side. It actually looks like the taper on the neck doesn't match the taper of the body and the gap widens towards the back of the bass.

Is that normal? Maybe it's just the angle but I see it in two seperate pictures.
 
^It doesn't seem like the tightest neck pocket on the B string side. It actually looks like the taper on the neck doesn't match the taper of the body and the gap widens towards the back of the bass.

Is that normal? Maybe it's just the angle but I see it in two seperate pictures.

Just the result of angles, lighting and a wide angle lens. I haven't had this neck off, but it's very similar in look to my other Ritter and it's neck fits beautifully, not too lose, not too tight. Then there's the matter of the 9 neck screws......

If you have a Ritter or have had the chance to look at one close hand you'll know just how good the fit and finish is.
 
Just the result of angles, lighting and a wide angle lens. I haven't had this neck off, but it's very similar in look to my other Ritter and it's neck fits beautifully, not to lose, not to tight. Then there's the matter of the 9 neck screws......

If you have a Ritter or have had the chance to look at one close hand you'll know just how good the fit and finish is.

I have never owned or played a Ritter. I would expect them to be relatively close to perfect that's why I asked the question without assuming it is a real issue and not just the shots.

In any case it "looks" like a fairly large space in the pictures especially the one of the upper horn.

I am not criticizing, it looks like a beautiful instrument.


Edit: Isn't it 10 neck screws?
 
That's gotta be one of my favorite Ritters. I gig regularly with a boutique bass that sounds and feels amazing, but sometimes I wonder if it looks a bit out of place. Something like that would definitely bridge the gap. Not that I have anywhere near the money to get another bass. :p

/drool :help:
 
I have never owned or played a Ritter. I would expect them to be relatively close to perfect that's why I asked the question without assuming it is a real issue and not just the shots.

In any case it "looks" like a fairly large space in the pictures especially the one of the upper horn.

I am not criticizing, it looks like a beautiful instrument.


Edit: Isn't it 10 neck screws?

My bad - 10 it is!

I'm not taking your observation as criticism of the bass. It is always good to discuss basses. Both my Ritters have similar 'gaps' where the neck meets the body, but I can understand where you're coming from from the pics.
 
5 days into my new Ritter ownership and this thing is awesome. I realise I'm still in the honeymoon period, but 'The Blue Orange' plays like a dream and sounds awesome. I'm really digging the simplicity of the two band pre. I've gigged it with my rock band and tonight I rehearsed in my big band and in two quite different setting this bass did really well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.