TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's been decades since there has been a gig anywhere that "required" such a rig; such a rig is only "required" by stubborn bass players. Still, OP stated the exercise is for giggles, so "rock & roar!"I have never wanted to play anything/anywhere that called for a rig of that scale. Enjoy it!
That's crazy cool. Would love to hear that beastie play next time I'm down that way.View attachment 2913290 Hi everyone,
I'm trying a new, fun and crazy thing with gear right now, and hope that some of you may have some insight to the possibilities and technical requirements for running three SVT's and matching cabs together. Thanks!
Bass into 1 head,slave the other 2 off it in a chain,each head to a cab .
View attachment 2913290 Hi everyone,
I'm trying a new, fun and crazy thing with gear right now, and hope that some of you may have some insight to the possibilities and technical requirements for running three SVT's and matching cabs together. Thanks!
We still can't hear you.
LOL...come on, dude!I have a question; I've never played through an SVT before, but if a guy had one solid-state 450 Ampeg and two tube SVTs...
how much of the SVT tone magic comes from the preamp, vs. the power amp? And how well did Ampeg succeed in achieving SVT preamp tone in the SS 450 head?
If the preamp part of the SS 450 head is decent sounding, and Steve wants to use all three amps (!!!because three big-ass amps!!!) what about this: if the main magic of the SVT comes from pushing the power tubes through the 810E cabs, maybe the SS450 head could be the master and the two SVT heads could be slaved off its line out...thus contributing a big pile of 6550 tube leg-humping fun and also giving the SS450 head something useful to do...?
LOL...come on, dude!The only thing that the SVT 450 and a real SVT have in common are the cosmetics.
One of the very few Ampeg amps I don't care for. That said, the OP seems happy and I'm happy for him, but still...You seem to feel that the SVT's preamp is a significant part of what's desireable in an SVT's sound, and the 450's preamp does not approximate that.
Eh...you're way better off using one of the tube SVT's pres and slaving it into the 450. Or replacing the 450 with another SVT-CLWhat got me thinking about that was the idea that some people like Music Man amps, in a Fender Twin kind of way, even though they have solid-state preamps driving a tube power section. I thought maybe if the 450's preamp architecture--at least from an EQ/tone-shaping features standpoint--was similar, maybe that head could serve as the tone shaper but by slaving the preamp signal through two actual SVT tube power stages, you'd still get the magic.
Actually I have a PF800 and an SCR-DI, and both of them do a very reasonable job at it for solid state gear.But the only Ampeg bass gear I've tried to date is a PF500 head and a SCR-DI, and my understanding is that neither of these would be a good approximation of an SVT either...
One of the very few Ampeg amps I don't care for. That said, the OP seems happy and I'm happy for him, but still...
Eh...you're way better off using one of the tube SVT's pres and slaving it into the 450. Or replacing the 450 with another SVT-CL![]()
It can be, but it can also be dead clean.Interesting. So the SVT's preamp must be a pretty major part of "the sound." It's not strictly a compressing , lightly distorting tube power stage thing.
LOL! It really is an experience.Man, I have to find me an SVT to play through and get my head around what they do. I know I like how they sound when I see them up on a stage, but who knows how much amp I'm hearing vs. FOH in that kind of situation. I want someone to turn me loose on one for a few hours in a big room where I can turn it up.
Or, you know, maybe turn me loose on three of them in a big room for a few hours. That'd be okay with me too.