Legendary Sadowsky quality in this line of basses?
Looks to me like the pickguard/control plate are not a good fit on this green bass, in this picture.
+1
And the idea to use a rough prototype for advertising photos is not inspiring.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Legendary Sadowsky quality in this line of basses?
Looks to me like the pickguard/control plate are not a good fit on this green bass, in this picture.
Actually Okume makes a really good body wood. Weight is good, it finishes well and is quite resonant. But the quality of the wood in the neck looks far less than ideal when you look at the headstock.For me there are at least 3 things putting me off of these. 1: Pre-amp/no VTC 2: Okume body wood. Really???, 3: country of origin.
It won't have it on the headstock.
Copyrights issues...
It will be branded RSD...for Roger Sadowsky Design...![]()
It won't have it on the headstock.
Copyrights issues...
It will be branded RSD...for Roger Sadowsky Design...![]()
Thought i saw an video interview recently with Roger stating someone in China has a copyright on the Sadowsky name, but has never used it in production of an instrument. Therefore he is going through legal formalities to secure the Sadowsky name to use on future China made MetroExpress basses. I could be wrong..
What makes you say that?Actually Okume makes a really good body wood. Weight is good, it finishes well and is quite resonant. But the quality of the wood in the neck looks far less than ideal when you look at the headstock.
The grain runs diagonally across the face of the headstock and the growth rings are widely spaced. There is quite a lot of runout on the fretboard. None of these are markers for a quality neck. Compare to this:What makes you say that?
It's a flat sawn neck; No problem with that,I'd say. Not sure if the quality is that easily detectable when looking at a picture online. Not saying that there aren't people that can, of course![]()
Are you saying the RSD basses are going to be... super collectible!? Gotta catch'em all!

Valid points. I can't see the attached picture though.The grain runs diagonally across the face of the headstock and the growth rings are widely spaced. There is quite a lot of runout on the fretboard. None of these are markers for a quality neck. Compare to this:
Valid points. I can't see the attached picture though.
It's a $900 bass. Pay full freight and you will get a fully appointed Sadowsky.
But do you? All of these components have been sources independently of Sadowsky and have never been used on any previous Sadowsky bass.
I liked the Metro because you knew you were getting a full Sadowsky build. With the Metro Express basses you're getting something else.
Time will tell whether these basses are "real" Sadowsky's. My judgement is currently reserved.
Honestly, I'd be shocked if a Metro Express felt, played, sounded like a NYC Sadowsky.I get the sentiment, but don’t you think that Roger has and will keep an eye on the entire design build process. Do people doubt Ken Smith’s Burner basses? Or Lakeland’s Skyline series? You are getting the Roger Sadowsky touch on those basses. And while you may not be happy with the final product (which is perfectly fine, don’t get me wrong), I believe that the majority of people won’t be disappointed.
I’m a die-hard forever Mike Lull guy, but I would love to lay hands on a Metro Express someday. I’ve spent time with a New York series, so I have a little bit of an idea of what to expect.
Agreed, on all counts.For me there are at least 3 things putting me off of these. 1: Pre-amp/no VTC 2: Okume body wood. Really???, 3: country of origin.
Honestly, I'd be shocked if a Metro Express felt, played, sounded like a NYC Sadowsky.
Not for that price. I'm sure they will be good value but the real deal is still in New York, IMHO.