Couldyou tell me why "hey're fearful their instruments are going to lose value"?Hilarious, look at all the sadowsky owners stumping for their brand because they're fearful their instruments are going to lose value!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Couldyou tell me why "hey're fearful their instruments are going to lose value"?Hilarious, look at all the sadowsky owners stumping for their brand because they're fearful their instruments are going to lose value!
What??The Sadowsky name will FOREVER also be associated with a "cheap", Chinese made entry level instrument with generic hardware
Ssssssssshhhhhh! Don't say that word, man!![]()
![]()

It’s not a rational fear, but irrational fear is a powerful thing.Couldyou tell me why "hey're fearful their instruments are going to lose value"?
Just played a SUB 5 string at GC that was $300 or so and was the best playing bass they had on the wallThat said, Sterling by Ernie Ball basses can be quite nice.![]()
Probably a bit of both. I'll freely admit that there's a thrill to the idea of owning something with a degree of exclusivity and I don't relish the idea of the Sadowsky name also being attached to a made in China production instrument. That isn't just because "made in China" is something that we see on (seemingly) every second product out there, it's also because my image of Sadowsky is directly linked to my earliest impressions of the brand (which were of a fairly small, in-house operation). But that's strictly the "romantic" aspect of things for me. From a playing perspective I have no concerns. Same for the value aspect (though I wouldn't like to see a jump in price with new NYCs). It's a lot easier to make a good bass for a lot less money than it was when I bought my first Sadowsky and I'm sure even the Chinese Sadowskys will be perfectly respectable instruments.So, I've been reading this thread, and the various reactions, and I can't help wondering if this is about the dilution of quality from a company that staked its reputation and price point on craftsmanship, or if it is about a once-exclusive club becoming less-than-exclusive?
Well, I'll be interested to see if a club thread dedicated specifically to Chinese Sadowskys pops up (the way that there is a "non-U.S. MTD" club thread in addition to the "U.S. MTD" club thread).The Argument about tarnishing the brand has no legs...
Do owners of PRS Private Stocks say “poopie, this thing is worthless now that they have the SE line”
Or MTD, Warwick, Brubaker and the list goes on and on....
I wonder why people still shell out thousands of dollars for a bolt-on, solid color Strat from the Fender Custom Shop when they can get a Mexican Strat, or a Squier? That’s the logic that doesn’t work, if you have the money and can afford the best you will get it.
So if you have the coin, Enjoy spending your money in whatever way you see fit, just don’t cry about a particular brand trying to reach a larger market!
Us regular folk would love to get our foot in the door and see what all the fuss is about... And even though it’s not the “real” thing, there will still be some of the Sadowsky DNA and design/build philosophies that have made him so successful.
My point was that the vast majority of Toyota, Honda, and Nissan owners know that their vehicle is not a Lexus, Acura, or an Infiniti - they happen to like any one of the 3 "luxury" brands and would like a vehicle that is similar (but not exactly the same), but at a more affordable price. For instance, my user name - MTDKingstonHeir: I know that it is not a Michael Tobias handmade bass, but when I purchased it I liked the fact that it has some similarities to its "bigger brother". I still hope to be able to buy a Michael Tobias Kingston, NY bass. Additionally, if I'm able to buy a Sadowsky Metro Express bass, I may, eventually, be able to save up for a US made Sadowsky, in the future. I certainly think that there is room in our great bass community for all kind of basses at all different price points. We live in "shining times" regarding the affordabilty of great quality musical instruments, these days. To each their own - have fun and play bass!Great example, however the fact that they've completely different brand names makes the opposite point of the one you're trying to make.
Same with Squier/Fender and SBMM/EBMM, Epiphone/Gibson, etc.
China has been known to substitute inferior components without consent from the companies that have outsourced to them.
I will never trust that a Chinese Sadowsky will be up to par. I can't stand when a Chinese screw head snaps off with low torque going into a pre-drilled hole.
Japanese hold themselves to a much higher standard and I personally would just keep my production there. Korea also has a very high standard and I would go there way before China.
Couldyou tell me why "hey're fearful their instruments are going to lose value"?
It’s all in the final setup. That’s where the extra dough goes. All these countries can and do make decent instruments with good components. but are the frets level and seated properly,is the neck relief good, are the pickups at the right height for the action, etc etc..
Roger Sadowsky is a master Builder.
That’s most likely one of the early prototypes that roger mentioned in the other video. He also mentioned that the string tree was wrong
If you watch the OP video, Roger specifically stated that the headstock branding was not correct. I think you all are looking at a scramble job. Roger also stated it would be fixed by NAMM; but, who knows? My guess is that Pat Wilkins will be doing some hurry up water slides.
I can confirm that this is a prototype. The final ME’s will have a different logo than this (but not the NYC logo exactly) and our standard string retainer.