• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Show me your compact pedalboard setup

I don’t really understand the appeal of the Noble preamp… why even use tubes if you aren’t trying to clip/distort them? Am I missing something? It has no cab sim? So it can only be used for clean tones…?
Tubes aren't only a means of clipping a signal; they also provide their own color. More specifically, they are well-known for increasing even-order harmonics. This is why tubes are often characterized as imparting a "warm" or "thick" tone. As your comment rightly intimates, this effect becomes particularly dramatic when a tube is saturated and begins to clip, producing distortion. But it exists before that point as well: it's just a lot more subtle. That is to say, it's not as obvious an effect turning on a fuzz or flanger, nor is it meant to be, but it is still easy to hear the change when I remove or add a tube preamp like the Arkham Oracle, Noble, or Jule Simon to my signal chain.

In short, tubes--even clean tubes--change the timbre of one's signal. Whether or not that is "appealing" is something only you can answer. If you are looking for an edge-of-breakup tone or actual tube distortion, the Noble is not what you want; but if you want to add some color to your clean signal (especially useful if you are ampless) the Noble is one of many ways you can do that. Another way would be to use a tube DI like the Khan or REDDI. Those are all about producing clean, tube tones and are very popular with folks playing direct. You can read all about those--and I recommend you do since the parallels are significant--in the big preamp and DI thread on TalkBass. You can even hear a bunch of audio samples, though those aren't always helpful since it's not possible to capture all the tones a preamp with an EQ can produce.

For what it's worth: the Noble wasn't for me--the sound wasn't tight enough for my ears--but I am a big fan of the Jule Simone tube preamp (which, as it happens, is designed to have its tubes overdriven, though I don't use it that way).

Correct. It doesn't have a cab sim because it was designed over a decade ago and the product is in such demand that its builder is too busy fulfilling orders to redesign it lol. But most preamps don't offer cab sims anyway. Gear like the Shift Line Olympic MKIIIS and Origin Effects BassRigs are not representative of most preamp pedals. After all, a preamp pedal primarily aims to recreate the preamp (tone-shaping and level-raising) section of an amp head, not the EQ curve of any particular cabinet.

You seem to think a preamp pedal that only offers clean tones is limited, but I think that perspective fails to account for the difference between a preamp and a preamp pedal. The latter is designed for modern performance where most bassists aren't generating their dirt from an overdriven amp so much as a chain of pedals which likely includes a sampling of overdrive, distortion, and fuzz. Of course, even pedals are a bit outdated with all the modeling software out there now. But I still prefer to use them from an interactive and performative standpoint.
 
Last edited:
Tubes aren't only a means of clipping a signal; they also provide their own color. More specifically, they are well-known for increasing even-order harmonics. This is why tubes are often characterized as imparting a "warm" or "thick" tone. As your comment rightly intimates, this effect becomes particularly dramatic when a tube is saturated and begins to clip, producing distortion. But it exists before that point as well: it's just a lot more subtle. That is to say, it's not as obvious an effect turning on a fuzz or flanger, nor is it meant to be, but it is still easy to hear the change when I remove or add a tube preamp like the Arkham Oracle, Noble, or Jule Simon to my signal chain.

In short, tubes--even clean tubes--change the timbre of one's signal. Whether or not that is "appealing" is something only you can answer. If you are looking for an edge-of-breakup tone or actual tube distortion, the Noble is not what you want; but if you want to add some color to your clean signal (especially useful if you are ampless) the Noble is one of many ways you can do that. Another way would be to use a tube DI like the Khan or REDDI. Those are all about producing clean, tube tones and are very popular with folks playing direct. You can read all about those--and I recommend you do since the parallels are significant--in the big preamp and DI thread on TalkBass. You can even hear a bunch of audio samples, though those aren't always helpful since it's not possible to capture all the tones a preamp with an EQ can produce.

For what it's worth: the Noble wasn't for me--the sound wasn't tight enough for my ears--but I am a big fan of the Jule Simone tube preamp (which, as it happens, is designed to have its tubes overdriven, though I don't use it that way).

Correct. It doesn't have a cab sim because it was designed over a decade ago and the product is in such demand that its builder is too busy fulfilling orders to redesign it lol. But most preamps don't offer cab sims anyway. Gear like the Shift Line Olympic MKIIIS and Origin Effects BassRigs are not representative of most preamp pedals. After all, a preamp pedal primarily aims to recreate the preamp (tone-shaping and level-raising) section of an amp head, not the EQ curve of any particular cabinet.

You seem to think a preamp pedal that only offers clean tones is limited, but I think that perspective fails to account for the difference between a preamp and a preamp pedal. The latter is designed for modern performance where most bassists aren't generating their dirt from an overdriven amp so much as a chain of pedals which likely includes a sampling of overdrive, distortion, and fuzz. Of course, even pedals are a bit outdated with all the modeling software out there now. But I still prefer to use them from an interactive and performative standpoint.
Perhaps I’d appreciate the Noble more if I had the chance to try one out. Without it in my hands though, it kinda seems… overpriced for what it does. The Khan VTDI seems a bit more reasonably priced for a very similar product. I’ll have to check out the Jule Simone.

Edit: the Simone by Jule looks awesome… but way out of my budget of course. Even more expensive than the Noble. Probably equally as unavailable if I had to guess. I’m fine with my solid state Tech 21 gear… it’s all about how it sounds in the band mix anyway and a SansAmp may be dated by some people’s standards it’s tried & true and “just works” in most band mixes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MikoFX
Perhaps I’d appreciate the Noble more if I had the chance to try one out. Without it in my hands though, it kinda seems… overpriced for what it does. The Khan VTDI seems a bit more reasonably priced for a very similar product. I’ll have to check out the Jule Simone.

Edit: the Simone by Jule looks awesome… but way out of my budget of course. Even more expensive than the Noble. Probably equally as unavailable if I had to guess. I’m fine with my solid state Tech 21 gear… it’s all about how it sounds in the band mix anyway and a SansAmp may be dated by some people’s standards it’s tried & true and “just works” in most band mixes.

IMO, if you're the type that likes to plug straight into a DI and send that to the soundboard for the soundman/engineer to manage, then you're well positioned to like something like a Noble. If you're like me and you want something that does more of the SVT thing, I think the classic BDDI is still difficult to defeat.
 
IMO, if you're the type that likes to plug straight into a DI and send that to the soundboard for the soundman/engineer to manage, then you're well positioned to like something like a Noble. If you're like me and you want something that does more of the SVT thing, I think the classic BDDI is still difficult to defeat.
How about both? Run a sansamp into the noble…
 
Perhaps I’d appreciate the Noble more if I had the chance to try one out. Without it in my hands though, it kinda seems… overpriced for what it does. The Khan VTDI seems a bit more reasonably priced for a very similar product. I’ll have to check out the Jule Simone.

Edit: the Simone by Jule looks awesome… but way out of my budget of course. Even more expensive than the Noble. Probably equally as unavailable if I had to guess. I’m fine with my solid state Tech 21 gear… it’s all about how it sounds in the band mix anyway and a SansAmp may be dated by some people’s standards it’s tried & true and “just works” in most band mixes.
I think it's widely known that the Noble is overpriced. Just the reality of demand far outpacing supply.

The Khan VTDI is phenomenal. Very different sound than the Noble, though. The Khan is transparent and focused; the Noble is very colored and looser feeling. I have a Khan mounted beneath my mini board.

I'm not sure what info you are looking at, but the Simone is far cheaper than the Noble. New, it's $200 less (or $900+ less than a rush order) and used it's around $1,200 less because a used Simone is sells for less than a new one while a used Noble sells for much more than a new one.

I actually disagree with your sentiment that "it's all about how it sounds in a band mix." When it comes to preamp pedals, a large part is how it sounds over IEMs in a silent stage environment.
 
Some killer set ups in this thread!

I’ll throw mine in the mix, nothing cosmic but it performs well and is pretty easy to manage.

I’m all about lighter/smaller stuff these days!
 

Attachments

  • B8CE67BA-0800-4BFE-844F-527D0F653C5C.jpeg
    B8CE67BA-0800-4BFE-844F-527D0F653C5C.jpeg
    4.1 MB · Views: 44
Some killer set ups in this thread!

I’ll throw mine in the mix, nothing cosmic but it performs well and is pretty easy to manage.

I’m all about lighter/smaller stuff these days!

Looks like a fun setup! If you ever use both at the same time, I'd personally consider moving the octave pedal before the chorus (won't get into the compressor position, since that's such an individual thing) to assist with good tracking from the octave. But otherwise I'd be very happy rocking that rig at most of my shows!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zbysek and jmmyoh
Looks like a fun setup! If you ever use both at the same time, I'd personally consider moving the octave pedal before the chorus (won't get into the compressor position, since that's such an individual thing) to assist with good tracking from the octave. But otherwise I'd be very happy rocking that rig at most of my shows!
Appreciate it! I haven’t had a use case for chorus/octave simultaneously to this point.

The octave was the last addition to the board so it was easier to add the smallest pedal there haha.
 
That is certainly the quintessential church rig. I like that you have a little bit of originality in the Subsonic and DCX combo to offset the EHX BMS/Aggie Tone Hammer/JHS Kilt signal path that everyone else has these days.

That's really clean and well put together. Nicely done.
 
How long have you had the Pigtronix tuner. I just got one it's simple and to the point, my favorite kind of pedal, but it seems kind of flimsy? It might be because it's so empty that it weighs as much as air, just curious about durability. 👍
Mine broke almost immediately. Went back to the TCE I've had for, what, a decade?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zbysek
How long have you had the Pigtronix tuner. I just got one it's simple and to the point, my favorite kind of pedal, but it seems kind of flimsy? It might be because it's so empty that it weighs as much as air, just curious about durability. 👍
I've had it just a couple of months. It hasn't left the house yet. It doesn't seem as accurate as, say, any of my Peterson tuners, or even the TC Electronic tuners, but it does get the bass in tune, and never fails to track the B string.