Obviously there's an element of individual preference here... 22 x 22 x 20 isn't huge, and the weight isn't bad for 5.6cf, but the size & shape would make it an awkward carry for some. I'd probably choose 12s over 15s for that reason.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Show your Bill Fitzmaurice cab
- Thread starter Dragonlord
- Start date
Obviously there's an element of individual preference here... 22 x 22 x 20 isn't huge, and the weight isn't bad for 5.6cf, but the size & shape would make it an awkward carry for some. I'd probably choose 12s over 15s for that reason.
billfitzmaurice
Commercial User
- Sep 15, 2004
- 16,860
- 278
- 76
- Disclosures
- Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
I find my Jack 12 awkward to carry, too. But its performance makes it more than worthwhile, and it fits into my (small) car.
In the early 90s I used an Ampeg SVT CL and 8X10 cab, both in flightcases. I was younger and stronger then.
In conclusion, nothing beats a J12 for its balance of performance and portability. IHMO.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
In the early 90s I used an Ampeg SVT CL and 8X10 cab, both in flightcases. I was younger and stronger then.
In conclusion, nothing beats a J12 for its balance of performance and portability. IHMO.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Much like most of things in life, gigging is not reducible to a single influencing variable. How much of a pain it is to pack up at the end of the night, and how fast I set up, are both big factors to how much I enjoy a performance. Me getting on and off stage faster makes the whole show better. Me not hurting my back hauling stuff or banging my cab on doorways makes me happier.
In short, no. It's not all about the sound. If it was, would anyone have bothered with making 3lb amps? Would Bill have bothered making cabinets that are insanely loud for the size in the required bandwidth for bg? why not just use more quieter cabs?
Dcodym, Im doing 5 gigs this week at 5 different venues. Walk a mile in a man's shoes before making sweeping comments like your post above.
Interesting sidetrack in this thread, but I believe the above comment is what this thread is all about (although I do think dcodym is missing the point a bit....) Nowhere in this thread, as well as countless others, will you find any reference to a musician buying or building a cab solely for the sake of convenient transport. Over the past twenty years or so, there has been continued R&D in materials, speaker design, and cabinet dimensions, all intended to deliver big cabinet sound in a smaller, more portable box. BMF and fEARful, two top-level cabinet designers, have proven big sound can come from small cabs, and I'm sure almost all of us here have some kind of Major Brand cabinet we're using ie., I have an EA Wizzy12, and an AccuGroove Tri112. Both small, portable, lightweight, loud, and great-sounding cabs. I also have an AccuGroove El Whappo Jr 212 cab, which I seldom use because my two single 12's can be used individually or together, are easy to "schlep", don't take up much room on stages that seem to be increasingly shrinking, and put out big, clean, clear sound. Combined with the state-of-the-art small and portable heads available today (Genz Benz, TC Electronics, Mark Bass, EA, my own Walter Woods, etc.), it's entirely possible to come close to the industry/touring benchmark; the Ampeg SVT and 8x10 Cabinet, without the weight and cubic space to deal with.
I liken all of this to this simile; automobiles of the fifties/sixties were large and lumbering for the most part, with an inefficient big-block, gas guzzling motor. They got you from point A-to-B, and we were blessed during that time that gas was cheap! Now we have cars designed with better ergonomics, smaller, more efficient engines, more aerodynamic bodystyles, etc., etc. Now I happen to love old classic cars, but it's no secret new cars (of all shapes and sizes) do a better job of getting us to our destination in a safer, more comfortable "shell", with as much, if not more, power from smaller, more efficient engines. I could spend more time making this point more clear, but you get the point I think....
I have bought Bill's Plans CD, and would love to build a Jack12, and an Omni 12, but don't have the space at the moment. I have been an avid reader over the past five years or so of his website and forum, along with this thread. By now I believe it's obvious, with all of the cabinets built and used by bass players around the world, Bill's designs stand up to the best Major Brand cabinets being built today. They are comparably cheap to build, are more efficient, lightweight, produce great sound, and can be customized to suit the builders tastes and esthetics.
But, to put it succinctly; these cabinets are designed to be All About The Sound! Why else would Bill's designs be going strong after all these years? I still look forward to the day I can build one!
Guys, I completely stand corrected. I apologize for distracting from the thread and for saying something, as I see now, was kind of ignorant.
Having the perfect sounding amp, I see does not always mean having the perfect gig. Sorry for sounding like a snob. I humbly offer my apologies.
I really was, ignorantly so, confused by the issue, but I see how playing five nights a week with a back breaker could quickly outweigh getting the perfect sound after a month of hauling something like that around.
Luckily, though, I think most people will find that Bill has a ton of options to be able to suit anyone's situation.
...sorry if I was douchey...
Having the perfect sounding amp, I see does not always mean having the perfect gig. Sorry for sounding like a snob. I humbly offer my apologies.
I really was, ignorantly so, confused by the issue, but I see how playing five nights a week with a back breaker could quickly outweigh getting the perfect sound after a month of hauling something like that around.
Luckily, though, I think most people will find that Bill has a ton of options to be able to suit anyone's situation.
...sorry if I was douchey...
Looks well-built. Could you talk a little about the horn and drivers, and compare/contrast with the piezo arrays... how sound and usage differs?
... or T48, or T39... Guessing this is a DJ rig.
I finished more than a few. This is my PA system I built. I will let youi know how it sounds after the 11th.
Attachments
Actually the set of plans I bought (Iwent for the whole shooting match) came out prior to the T60's being available. There is also the matter of hauling these things. I originally started building Jack 10's to use as a practice system and for very small gigs. However, there is a danger in seeing your projects come to life...you want to build more. The dang things just kept calling me out to the shop. I am thinking of trying my hand at the DR's next. As to sound, the mids and highs of the jacks are stunning, especially with the 1" throat drivers. The Tuba 24's are great in a medium room, but I needed the 36's for outside work.
Rick
lelandcrooks
Commercial User
billfitzmaurice
Commercial User
- Sep 15, 2004
- 16,860
- 278
- 76
- Disclosures
- Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
Not as good as they would if you'd followed the plans. Those loaded with the compression horns won't vertically array. Those loaded with the piezo arrays don't have enough elements for PA use. And neither has the horizontal dispersion or sensitivity of melded arrays. That doesn't mean they don't sound good, just that they could sound even better.
Hey, the mad scientist himself. First thanks for great plans that were, for the most part, pretty easy to follow. I know, I didn't follow them exactly, but when I started the first build, a pair of Jack 10's, this system was the farthest thing from my mind. I am going to build a pair of DR 280's next, and that will render all the shortcomings of my present construction a moot point. Those, with the pair of Tuba 36's will be more than enough to cover the places I play. I deviated from your plans in one other aspect. I used 3/4" Aruco for the exteriors of all cabs. I build cabs with the worst roadies imaginable in mind, as if I ever had roadies. As long as I have your attention, I will post a pic of one other bass bottom I built...enlisting your thoughts.
Best regard,
Rick
- Dec 21, 2007
- 15,227
- 45,061
- Disclosures
- Lark in the Morning Instructional Videos; Audix Microphones
Always cool to see someone learn something, apologize, and come straight with it.
Kudos, amigo.
And now back to the thread. BTW, I'll be gigging my Omni10 this week. It's a great cab, and perfect for my Folk in A gig.
Kudos, amigo.
And now back to the thread. BTW, I'll be gigging my Omni10 this week. It's a great cab, and perfect for my Folk in A gig.
Bill,
I used the desgin for the Tuba 24 for the bottom half of this cab, using 2 10" BP101 Eminence spkrs, and 2 more for the top half, front loaded at an angle. Cab is 25" wide over all. The top half is vented through the gap in the face, and the spkr chamber has an angled back to avoid reflections or standing wave problems. Not sure if the design makes sense, but on stage I have great volume and out front the projection is pretty astounding. Your thoughts?
Rick
I used the desgin for the Tuba 24 for the bottom half of this cab, using 2 10" BP101 Eminence spkrs, and 2 more for the top half, front loaded at an angle. Cab is 25" wide over all. The top half is vented through the gap in the face, and the spkr chamber has an angled back to avoid reflections or standing wave problems. Not sure if the design makes sense, but on stage I have great volume and out front the projection is pretty astounding. Your thoughts?
Rick
