• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Show your Epifani setups!!!

#241
Here are mine. Never mind the Bergies!

0001c2m2.jpg



Cabs top to bottom: UL-110, UL-112, T-112 (v1.0)
I got my T-112 from a fellow TB'er last year on trade for an AccuGroove Tri112 (also a first version unit).

He told me that, being an early unit, it's a little bit shallower than the version that they started making soon afterward. He also mentioned that even though the new ones (revision 1) were a little deeper, there was little or no discernable tonal differences between the two. Haven't verified all this with Nick but from what I've gathered here in the past about it, that seems to be the prevailing sentiment. Anyone care to share their opinions on this?

Amps are a Woods Ultra, an Epifani Quest II (from the MF clearance sale) and a Stewart 2.1.
 
#243
The Diaper Geni said:
xgabriel, there's your solution! Tom B has a T112 for sale here on TB. Case closed!!

Oh, and I hope you're not offended by the "don't obsess" comment. FWIW, I'm the King of Obsessing. Or KOO for short.
Click to expand...

Nah, I'm not looking for another 1x12 cab. I mean, I already have two UL112s, what would I need the T112 for?

No offense taken! I am totally obsessing about it. It's what I do best! ;)
 
#244
VintageBT6Lover said:
Here are mine. Never mind the Bergies!

0001c2m2.jpg



Cabs top to bottom: UL-110, UL-112, T-112 (v1.0)
I got my T-112 from a fellow TB'er last year on trade for an AccuGroove Tri112 (also a first version unit).

He told me that, being an early unit, it's a little bit shallower than the version that they started making soon afterward. He also mentioned that even though the new ones (revision 1) were a little deeper, there were little to no discernable tonal differences between the two. Haven't verified all this with Nick but from what I've gathered here in the past about it, that seems to be the prevailing sentiment. Anyone care to share their opinions on this?

Amps are a Woods Ultra, an Epifani Quest II (from the MF clearance sale) and a Stewart 2.1.
Click to expand...

Very Nice! The Bergs are really small compared too Epifani. I have never seem them other. Thanks!

-Christian
 
#245
xgabriel said:
Nah, I'm not looking for another 1x12 cab. I mean, I already have two UL112s, what would I need the T112 for?

No offense taken! I am totally obsessing about it. It's what I do best! ;)
Click to expand...

Well, If your amp will push two ohms, you could have a three 1x12 set up. I would wager that you'd be able to hear that!! Or the meatier T112 with a UL112 would pair nicely, kind of like a 112 and 210 combo.

As a side note, the three 12's is what I'm going to try next. A T212 and a T112. Use one or the other for most all my gigs, but combine them for bigger/outdoor stuff. :bassist:
 
#248
VintageBT6Lover said:
He told me that, being an early unit, it's a little bit shallower than the version that they started making soon afterward. He also mentioned that even though the new ones (revision 1) were a little deeper, there were little to no discernable tonal differences between the two. Haven't verified all this with Nick but from what I've gathered here in the past about it, that seems to be the prevailing sentiment. Anyone care to share their opinions on this?
Click to expand...

This is what I've heard as well. Does yours have the black panel/Speakons or the white panel/quarter inch only? I believe the tweeter/crossover is a bit different in the newer (NYC vs T) cabs, but I may be wrong about that. Either way, those Epi 112's are some serious cabs, gobs of low end - CLEAR low end! :bassist:

Or should I say,
bannana_guitar.gif
rock_band.gif
 
#249
xgabriel said:
Would there be any advanatges to running one UL112 with a UL210 as opposed to two UL112s? Would the extra speaker in the UL210 allow me to get a bit louder with some more punch? I would probably use the UL210 with the tweeter at normal, and use the UL112 with its tweeter off. Any thoughts to this configuration?
Click to expand...

sure,

dont see how a ul210 + ul112 setup wouldnt kick more butt. 10" speaker punch is hard to get from any 12" speaker, and definitely more beneficial.

heck, i'd use this setup, but call me shallow, but i like the uniform look of a pair of ul112's. ;)
 
#250
VintageBT6Lover said:
Here are mine. Never mind the Bergies!

0001c2m2.jpg



Cabs top to bottom: UL-110, UL-112, T-112 (v1.0)
I got my T-112 from a fellow TB'er last year on trade for an AccuGroove Tri112 (also a first version unit).

He told me that, being an early unit, it's a little bit shallower than the version that they started making soon afterward. He also mentioned that even though the new ones (revision 1) were a little deeper, there was little or no discernable tonal differences between the two. Haven't verified all this with Nick but from what I've gathered here in the past about it, that seems to be the prevailing sentiment. Anyone care to share their opinions on this?

Amps are a Woods Ultra, an Epifani Quest II (from the MF clearance sale) and a Stewart 2.1.
Click to expand...

wow,

very cool rigs! and yea, like Hou asked, how do the bergs stack up (no pun!) to the epifani (1x12)x2 rig?
 
#251
gruuv said:
This is what I've heard as well. Does yours have the black panel/Speakons or the white panel/quarter inch only? I believe the tweeter/crossover is a bit different in the newer (NYC vs T) cabs, but I may be wrong about that. Either way, those Epi 112's are some serious cabs, gobs of low end - CLEAR low end! :bassist:

Or should I say,
bannana_guitar.gif
rock_band.gif
Click to expand...

:D
My T112 has a white panel and speakons only, #266.
 
#253
xgabriel said:
Would there be any advanatges to running one UL112 with a UL210 as opposed to two UL112s? Would the extra speaker in the UL210 allow me to get a bit louder with some more punch? I would probably use the UL210 with the tweeter at normal, and use the UL112 with its tweeter off. Any thoughts to this configuration?
Click to expand...

This is the configuration I just bought and I love the sound and flexibility.

I have the UL-210C combo (8 ohm) with a UL-112 extension. I like the 210 as a standalone better than a single 112 for the types of playing I do. I find the 210 more even across the spectrum and the 112 having more punch and low-end growl. The 210 by itself is also louder and more present than a single 112, but that is to be expected with the extra speaker cone area. When testdriving the various combinations, I liked the pairing of the 210 with a 112 better than a pair of 112s. I also like the fact that the combo and the extension have the exact same width and depth dimensions and so they stack perfectly.
 
#259
steamthief said:
All the props for Epifani has me curious about a UL410. My amp pushes 440w @ 4 ohms. Would this seriously underpower the 1000w UL410?
Click to expand...

+1 to the posts about it being impossible to underpower a cab. The good news about the 410UL is that a) it comes in a 4ohm version, so it's great as a single cab solution for a moderate power SS head, and b) it is VERY efficient... i.e., high SPL.... loud per watt versus some other cabs.

I typically power mine with a Thunderfunk550 (550watts into 4ohms), and it is loud enough for all but the loudest gigs.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back