• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Simple question are we moving back to combo amps?

I started playing using combo in 1968. And now I went from an Ampeg half stack, to a Fender Rumble 100 combo.
5Jty2Wg.jpg
R 100.JPG
 
I have 2 combos, Peavey Max 115 and a Rumble 25 for practice. I also have a Peavey Delta bass head and a 1x15 cab and a 210 cab that I can still tote. I can tell you that I’m not moving back to SVTs at my age.
 
Depends a lot on the gig and the equipment.

I use a Fender Rumble 100 for most gigs, but I also have a Genz-Benz Shuttle 6.2 docked on a 12" cab and I can add a second 2x10 cab. The Shuttle is essentially a combo with a 3.75 pound 600W (peak) amp that can be separated, which I think is the best of both options.

When class D amps get so light that they're essentially piggybacking on a cab, it's hard to tell the difference between a combo and separate units.

Oh - I also have a Genz lightweight 2x12 Neo cab, but it's only because I have delusions that I might have to be loud at some point. The Shuttle and the 1x12 paired with the 2x10 can get silly loud. I should probably sell the Neo 2x12.

For clarification, the Shuttle 6.2 is rated at 600 watts RMS not peak. If using peak metrics, that would be over 1000 watts peak with its 3DPM output management circuitry

The Shuttle cabinets are also rated using RMS metrics.
 
For clarification, the Shuttle 6.2 is rated at 600 watts RMS not peak. If using peak metrics, that would be over 1000 watts peak with its 3DPM output management circuitry

The Shuttle cabinets are also rated using RMS metrics.

Thank you! Memory failed me. Tat 600W is really loud... and if I recall correctly, the 600W is at 4 ohms, with both my T-series cabs connected.

I look forward to each of your posts. I plan to use that Shuttle and the T-series speakers for the rest of my performing life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agedhorse
Are we moving to pedalboard DI's, running direct and a small amp (combo) for our monitoring if IEMs not used and for the big stage, whatever is supplied for the back line? Point being that instead of needing a big rig, most of us just need a smaller combo to cover the acoustic trios up through the 100-150 seat bars.

If it feels fat, I'm in. But I don't want explanations about what I am or what I am not hearing. If it doesn't feel fat, it's a technical exercise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyM
No, why on earth would we do that? Bass requires displacement. Period, the end. There's no way around that.

To me, the fact that are sub 5 lb amp heads that are several hundred watts is all the more reason to NOT use combos. In the olden days, everything was heavy, so you might save 5 lbs out of 50+ by having a head and speaker built together as one unit.

Now though, the cab/s might only weigh 30-40 lbs and the head probably weighs less than 10, and there are so many great heads and cabs out there, that limiting yourself to one because you like the other (by the same company) is flat out silly. If you happen to like both the head and cab from "Brand X", and they offer a combo that meets your volume needs, by all means get that. BUT, it also means you can't use the head or cab with anything else. Now, I have a Genz ShuttleMax 9.2 which is a 900w head and weighs about 7 lbs. I can use that with 1 or both of my Uber Quads, I can use it with 1 or both of my Shuttle 12 cabs, I can use it with my EVM 15B, etc... I happen to mostly have Genz cabs at this point, but that's just a coincidence and my roster will probably be diversifying a bit in the not too distant future. My point is I have tons of options based on what I want/need to do, and what kind of mood I'm in. And conversely I can use those cabs with any of my other heads. The Genz stuff (and now Genzler) is a bit of an outlier because the heads are removable. But sadly instead of just making all the cabs the same, they made "combo" cabs, which is what both of mine are, and so I'll end up spending a bit of cash to convert them

For me, the only reason to get a combo would be something that kind of has "a sound", like a B15, Baby Blue, Super Redhead, etc... The idea of buying a generic Fender combo off the floor at GC is completely unappealing to me, even if stuff like that is better than it was in the past. That just means that the separates are even better than that.

But bass players are increasingly lazy these days. Any shortcuts are jumped on, regardless of what they mean to the end result. The primary thing everyone always asks is "how much does it weigh?" Dude, you're a bass player. If you were worried about the weight of the gear, you should have gone with piccolo. And as a soundguy, it's pretty sad to see so many people say "oh, I don't use an amp any more". "Oh, because it sounds better?" "No, I just don't want to carry anything." That was probably more justified 30 years ago when a rig might be 120 lbs and up. Now that you can have a 600w 2x12 rig in 3 pieces all under 35 lbs and less than 75 lbs total that sounds fantastic, I don't really see that as a valid reason other than in very specific/unusual circumstances ("we're a 6 piece band and we tour in a Cessna", etc...).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrMole
I have all combos. I started with a combo (like most of us), stayed with them because it was what I was familiar with, and by the time I wanted something big enough that most sane people would opt for a head and cab, I realized I'd be spending less money to buy a 500W combo instead of separate components at an equivalent level of quality. So that's what I did.
If I was already in the head-and-cab ecosystem, then maybe I could have saved money by only having to buy one of the components to meet that need. But I'm happy where I'm at, and I find it convenient.
my combos:
GK MB112 mk1 (most bass playing at home, smaller gigs)
GK MB212 mk2 (used to be at rehearsal space, slightly less small gigs)
PJB Micro 7 (home use with my fretless bass and electric violin currently)

Since I liked that GK sound, if this were planned out all at once I totally could have spent less by getting one amp and two cabs or something. Instead I had the MB112 for a while, and after spending a long time trying out amps, realized I just wanted another MB112, but bigger. I did find separate amps and cabs that I liked too, but the combo won from the price point. Plus I could get almost the exact same sound at home and at practice without moving any amps/cabs/combos/whatever. But like I said, my situation was a result of the stuff I already had.
 
With Class D all the rage and extremely light cabinets, is the bass community opting for combo amps instead of the amp head and separate cabinet?
I have been giving it some serious thought, you'd only need to bring one thing instead of the head and extra cabs not to mention additional cables.
If you were to switch back what would be your rig of choice for gigs?
I have both a 210 combo, and a 410 half stack. I'm currently looking at a 750 watt head and 4x 112(8ohm) cab stack. This will give me 4 12s that I can run all 4 cabs at a 2ohm load, or 3 cabs @ 2.67 ohms, or 2 cabs @ 4ohms, or 1 cab @ 8 ohms
 
With Class D all the rage and extremely light cabinets, is the bass community opting for combo amps instead of the amp head and separate cabinet?
I have been giving it some serious thought, you'd only need to bring one thing instead of the head and extra cabs not to mention additional cables.
If you were to switch back what would be your rig of choice for gigs?
I've only had one combo that I gigged with and actually it was a cast-off from my son's gear back in 1997 when I started gigging again after a 20-year absence. That was a Yamaha 115 combo. Once it hit 5 on the dial, turning it up further made virtually no difference. I did run a Sunn 212 cabinet with it for a while, but it was only a 50-watt combo, so not very versatile. Besides that one combo, I've always used separate heads and cabs. It's much easier to upgrade as well as mix and match.

For instance, I have 3 options to use with my EX-112 cab in a venue. I can use my Eden TN-226 amp for one 4Ω cab (that's what I bought it for), I can use my big Eden WT500/800 amp for same cab or for two of them. I can use my Eden Nemesis RS400 for one cab, and I can use my new DNA-800 amp for either one or two of them (will do 2Ω). And that's just for my 12's. I can use my big Eden amp bridged at 800-watts into either my DNS-410 or DNS-210. I can also use my Class D DNS-800 amp for either the 410 or 210 or for both at once. It will only put 400-watts into one of them, but will also deliver another 400-watts (total of 800-watts) if I plug both in at the same time. Until I bought my DNS-210 in late 2019 I would use either my DNS-410 or two EX-112 cabs for medium sized venues. Now I use the DNS-210 for all my indoor venues and my DNS-410 for outdoor venues and Festivals.I don't currently have any combos, nor do I plan on getting any.

The modular capabilities of separate amp and cabs is a pretty big plus in my opinion.

It used to be that combos were not realistically gigging gear because they were typically low-powered. They are not necessarily so low-powered anymore. Most major manufacturers have combos that can be successfully gigged at least to small and medium venues. Most of those combos will deliver from half to 3/4 of their total power rating to the internal speaker, which allows you to expand it by adding another cab and releasing the rest of its rated power to be split between the two cabs. But not all of them do.

Eden's E-series combos and I believe their Terra Nova combos use 4 ohm speakers to get the most out of their 180-watt combo amp. They will take another cab or even two 8Ω cabs, but as soon as you hook up that extension speaker it disconnects the internal speaker. So you end up hauling around a combo with a disconnected speaker if you add an extension cab to it because that non-functioning speaker has the amp built into it. In a case like that it would be much better to have a separate amp.

I can understand the wish to get the most out of the combo's amp as it sits, but there really is only one upgrade path with combos like that. An upgrade to the 410 cab is the only thing that makes sense. I wouldn't recommend combos that do that. So be aware, just because it has an extension speaker out doesn't mean you'll be able to use both and extra speaker and the speakers in the combo itself. I think those combos are in the minority though, but definitely something you need to check out before buying.

Seems to me that Fender is now the big "combo" company with it's Rumble amps. All the Rumble combos seem to be popular and the 200, 500, and 800 combos can all take an extension speaker. The 500, which delivers up to 350-watts to its internal 210 speakers handles small and medium venues with no problem. Add a second 210 cab to it and you can play large indoor and also outdoor venues. The deal is you need to like that Fender sound and if you do, you can actually gig very successfully with it. I understand the amp in their 800 has all kinds of whistles, bells, and presets. It puts out 400 watts into its internal 210 and all 800 if you buy the extension cab plus the presets give it a lot of different sounds.

So combos can do a lot now days if you pay attention to what they can really do and don't presume they can do something without checking it out. I still don't see how combos will overtake separate head and cabinets, but some combos are both giggable and can be upgraded with another speaker cab. So I'd say they are more popular than they were 10-years ago but doubt they will ever become the preferred form factor.
 
my dream combo - the markbass minimark 802 form factor but 250 watts not just 150 and with a bass, mid, treble EQ instead of the VPF VLE knobs. lightweight - vertical - enough power for most of my gigs. i currently use the minimark 602 but looking for something more powerful for when gigs start coming back!
 
So basically this thread is a plea to Mesa Boogie for an updated Walkabout.
Gibson are you listening? Yamaha is looking to do great things with Ampeg, now it's your turn.
Does someone here know JC Curleigh? Let's make this happen.
You are fairly new here, but there is an updated Walkabout, and it was developed with a LOT of input from hundreds of players here on TalkBass. We took the things that players liked combined with the things players didn't like and came up with the WD-800 which has been very well received (in fact we can't build them fast enough). This happened several years before Gibson's acquisition, so this is something that JC can take off of his very long list.
 
...there is an updated Walkabout, and it was developed with a LOT of input from hundreds of players here on TalkBass...this is something that JC can take off of his very long list.
This is so cool, MesaBoogie on the case! Thank you @agedhorse for the swift inside info. Amazing. Another reason I'm a (relatively new) supporting member.
Agreed, the Subways/WD-800 is/are the unparalleled lords of bass amplification, but is there a combo that marries the 15"+WD Head a la Walkabout (like the one pictured above which I think is discontinued?)? Neither the MB site nor the University of Google have yielded any insight accordingly. I'll be at the MB Sunset/HWood store next week and will try to find out more. Thank you again @agedhorse also nice work making lanes for JC who is indeed busy!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop