you misunderstand my point. the definition i quoted said that, yes. i'm referring to typical association, ironically, just as you say here. you said it was irrelevant, while technically true, in reality, when you say bourbon to someone, they're going to associate that name with the south, and maybe KY in particular. that's why i'm saying it's not irrelevant. we're talking about communications and perception.
My original reply was to your post which claimed that bourbon is referred to as such due to where it's made. Bourbon has a legal definition, and it does not have to be made in KY to legally be called bourbon. Legally, the state of manufacture is irrelevant to the legal labeling of bourbon. That's all I meant. That wiki you referenced clears it up nicely.

. McLelland Islay is rumored to be (mostly) NAS Bowmore, and is actually drinkable, IMO, unlike a few of the other McLelland blends I've run into. I don't think I'd want Laphroig as my only bottle, but as a nice change of pace ...ahh!