TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Broke all of them at once?!?Had a glass of bowmore 15 a little earlier. So good.
My roomie broke my glencairns and I bought new ones today. Really disappointed by the drop in quality, they are much thicker.
Had a glass of bowmore 15 a little earlier. So good.
My roomie broke my glencairns and I bought new ones today. Really disappointed by the drop in quality, they are much thicker.
I've been sure that I was going to see a crack or chip more times than I can count but so far mine have seen some pretty good bumps without any harm, despite their light build.Always thought they felt pretty fragile.
I had a glass last fall and it only served to make me curious to try it again.I got to try some of the Indian-made Invalid Link Removed the other night. It was much better than I think most people would expect when they hear the phrase, "Indian-made single malt whisky." The peat was definitely present, but without the intense smokiness of, say, Lagavulin. The body was lighter, almost like a good Highland.
With just a couple drops of water, it was very enjoyable. The manufacturer has Fusion priced comparably with many of the established brands (i.e. Diageo's "Classic Malts"), so it'll be interesting to see how many people will take a chance on it...
Jr, rather than resort to blended scotch, try single malt McClelland's Islay scotch....$25 here in Taxachusetts and its a less aged bottling of Bowmore....not a better scotch for the money i'd dare say
Jr, rather than resort to blended scotch, try single malt McClelland's Islay scotch....$25 here in Taxachusetts and its a less aged bottling of Bowmore....not a better scotch for the money i'd dare say
I've still got a bottle of Bowmore Legend and having also had a bottle of the McClelland's Islay agree that the Bowmore is better, and close enough to the same price, but I completely disagree that single malts are better than blends across the board.What do you guys pay for Bowmore Legend there? I can get it for $29, just a tick more than the McClelland's Islay, and to me it's a far better malt.
Yeah, I don't buy into the blend/single prejudice, BUT, I do think it's a lot harder to find a great blend than it is a great single, and I like the fact that a single can vary from year to year (where sometimes a blending goal is to compensate for this and assure consistency despite varying natural things)....I completely disagree that single malts are better than blends across the board.
Most of my favorites are single malts, but to suggest that any single malt is better than Taketsuru 17 or 21; Hibiki 12 or 17; or even JW Double Black, Green or Blue is just simply not true.
Ardbog
That's some interesting historical background and I'll try to keep an eye out for Monkey Shoulder, as I otherwise probably wouldn't have even noticed it.The prejudice is certainly, in part at least, historical. Blends weren't really designed to compete, they were a cheap alternative produced by mixing malts with alcohol from other, cheaper and poorer tasting grains.
There are some nice blended malts out there too, I quite like Monkey Shoulder (a blend of malts from Kininvie (main producer), Balvenie and Glenfiddich).
I've tried to appreciate Speysides more, but I find that whilst they lack the peat-smoke taste of Islay malts, they don't add anything in return. To my mind the Islay malts do everything the Speysides do and then have a whole lot more going on as well. Perhaps this is just me...