TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
They should have told the ALF not PETA.
100% agreed. No specific individuals or groups should decide where the lines should be, but I believe that "anything goes" helps lead to things like this.I'm not a big pet guy. But that stuff is still really sick and twisted.
You can argue all you want, but this whole attitude of "I'm OK you're OK" got crap like this started. Everyone wants to push the envelope on what is now acceptable behavior right up until it crosses the line that offends THEM. So, you may be OK with public nudity, tattoos on the face, porn everywhere, violence on TV and movies to the point of pure ridiculousness, but suddenly you get offended when something like this happens. If the lines of "normal" had not been blurred decades ago, something like this would not even be conceivable today. Nobody would DARE try this. But these days, anything goes to a point. So I am no longer surprised by what I see. Sickened, but not surprised. My girls will grow up understanding that there IS such a thing a right and wrong. And anyone who doesn't agree will not be allowed around my house.
I don't include anything like homosexuality or interracial relationships in my list of "wrong" behavior, so don't jump on me assuming I am racist or sexist. But there ARE things that should NOT be tolerated. And those things are nowhere near as offensive as killing animals for fun. My point is, if THOSE OTHER things had not been allowed to thrive up until now, things like this would be so far out in left field that nobody would dare try them.
Allow some pet owners to stomp on this woman until the is gone. Better yet, make it a pack of little girls so it takes longer.
My two pennies.
"The greatness of a society and its moral progress can be judged by the way it treats its animals".
~Mahatma Gandhi.
I'm not a big pet guy. But that stuff is still really sick and twisted.
You can argue all you want, but this whole attitude of "I'm OK you're OK" got crap like this started. Everyone wants to push the envelope on what is now acceptable behavior right up until it crosses the line that offends THEM. So, you may be OK with public nudity, tattoos on the face, porn everywhere, violence on TV and movies to the point of pure ridiculousness, but suddenly you get offended when something like this happens. If the lines of "normal" had not been blurred decades ago, something like this would not even be conceivable today. Nobody would DARE try this. But these days, anything goes to a point. So I am no longer surprised by what I see. Sickened, but not surprised. My girls will grow up understanding that there IS such a thing a right and wrong. And anyone who doesn't agree will not be allowed around my house.
I don't include anything like homosexuality or interracial relationships in my list of "wrong" behavior, so don't jump on me assuming I am racist or sexist. But there ARE things that should NOT be tolerated. And those things are nowhere near as offensive as killing animals for fun. My point is, if THOSE OTHER things had not been allowed to thrive up until now, things like this would be so far out in left field that nobody would dare try them.
Allow some pet owners to stomp on this woman until the is gone. Better yet, make it a pack of little girls so it takes longer.
My two pennies.
What would you change without being overly broad on your impact on both free speech and food processing laws?Outrage is good, change is better.![]()
I'm fresh out of outrage since the pee drinking thread. Sorry
What would you change without being overly broad on your impact on both free speech and food processing laws?
I'm not a big pet guy. But that stuff is still really sick and twisted.
You can argue all you want, but this whole attitude of "I'm OK you're OK" got crap like this started. Everyone wants to push the envelope on what is now acceptable behavior right up until it crosses the line that offends THEM. So, you may be OK with public nudity, tattoos on the face, porn everywhere, violence on TV and movies to the point of pure ridiculousness, but suddenly you get offended when something like this happens. If the lines of "normal" had not been blurred decades ago, something like this would not even be conceivable today. Nobody would DARE try this. But these days, anything goes to a point. So I am no longer surprised by what I see. Sickened, but not surprised. My girls will grow up understanding that there IS such a thing a right and wrong. And anyone who doesn't agree will not be allowed around my house.
I don't include anything like homosexuality or interracial relationships in my list of "wrong" behavior, so don't jump on me assuming I am racist or sexist. But there ARE things that should NOT be tolerated. And those things are nowhere near as offensive as killing animals for fun. My point is, if THOSE OTHER things had not been allowed to thrive up until now, things like this would be so far out in left field that nobody would dare try them.
Allow some pet owners to stomp on this woman until the is gone. Better yet, make it a pack of little girls so it takes longer.
My two pennies.
Europe has always been quite less prudish than America when it comes to public nudity, and they certainly haven't openly embraced stomping on cats.
With that said, it's sad that we even need something like the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act.
It's a testament to humanity that we need and have []any[/i] laws.
It's a testament to humanity that we need and have []any[/i] laws.
We have laws to uphold the majority's standards of what is "right". On 90% of moral debates you will usually find a consensus on what is considered lawful.It's a testament to humanity that we need and have []any[/i] laws.
We have laws to uphold the majority's standards of what is "right". On 90% of moral debates you will usually find a consensus on what is considered lawful.
It IS sad that, on the subject of crushing a practically helpless living being for entertainment, we don't have 100% of the population on board with making that a punishable offense.