• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Something we can all be outraged about together.

I'm not a big pet guy. But that stuff is still really sick and twisted.

You can argue all you want, but this whole attitude of "I'm OK you're OK" got crap like this started. Everyone wants to push the envelope on what is now acceptable behavior right up until it crosses the line that offends THEM. So, you may be OK with public nudity, tattoos on the face, porn everywhere, violence on TV and movies to the point of pure ridiculousness, but suddenly you get offended when something like this happens. If the lines of "normal" had not been blurred decades ago, something like this would not even be conceivable today. Nobody would DARE try this. But these days, anything goes to a point. So I am no longer surprised by what I see. Sickened, but not surprised. My girls will grow up understanding that there IS such a thing a right and wrong. And anyone who doesn't agree will not be allowed around my house.

I don't include anything like homosexuality or interracial relationships in my list of "wrong" behavior, so don't jump on me assuming I am racist or sexist. But there ARE things that should NOT be tolerated. And those things are nowhere near as offensive as killing animals for fun. My point is, if THOSE OTHER things had not been allowed to thrive up until now, things like this would be so far out in left field that nobody would dare try them.

Allow some pet owners to stomp on this woman until the is gone. Better yet, make it a pack of little girls so it takes longer.

My two pennies.
100% agreed. No specific individuals or groups should decide where the lines should be, but I believe that "anything goes" helps lead to things like this.
 
I'm not a big pet guy. But that stuff is still really sick and twisted.

You can argue all you want, but this whole attitude of "I'm OK you're OK" got crap like this started. Everyone wants to push the envelope on what is now acceptable behavior right up until it crosses the line that offends THEM. So, you may be OK with public nudity, tattoos on the face, porn everywhere, violence on TV and movies to the point of pure ridiculousness, but suddenly you get offended when something like this happens. If the lines of "normal" had not been blurred decades ago, something like this would not even be conceivable today. Nobody would DARE try this. But these days, anything goes to a point. So I am no longer surprised by what I see. Sickened, but not surprised. My girls will grow up understanding that there IS such a thing a right and wrong. And anyone who doesn't agree will not be allowed around my house.

I don't include anything like homosexuality or interracial relationships in my list of "wrong" behavior, so don't jump on me assuming I am racist or sexist. But there ARE things that should NOT be tolerated. And those things are nowhere near as offensive as killing animals for fun. My point is, if THOSE OTHER things had not been allowed to thrive up until now, things like this would be so far out in left field that nobody would dare try them.

Allow some pet owners to stomp on this woman until the is gone. Better yet, make it a pack of little girls so it takes longer.

My two pennies.

So face-tattoos, internet porn, and public nudity lead to people torturing and mutilating animals?

It must be a totally Invalid Link Removed* thing that's gone on, as clearly this type of animal abuse is new and people haven't done this sort of stuff before.**

It's a good thing you're here to tell us how errant the ways of face tattoos, porn, and public nudity are and how they're destroying society.

*There totally haven't been years (decades?) of study on the behavior of violent people and serial killers noting the nearly universal link between serial killing and mutilating animals going back at least as early as the 60s. Oh, wait.

**except for Ted Bundy, David Berkowitz, Jeffery Dahmer, Brenda Spencer, Eric Harris, Dylan Klyebold, Mitchel Johnson, Albert DeSalvo (The Boston Strangler), and a few dozen or so more.
 
Outrage is good, change is better. :hiding::p

h79978A62.jpg
 
I'm not a big pet guy. But that stuff is still really sick and twisted.

You can argue all you want, but this whole attitude of "I'm OK you're OK" got crap like this started. Everyone wants to push the envelope on what is now acceptable behavior right up until it crosses the line that offends THEM. So, you may be OK with public nudity, tattoos on the face, porn everywhere, violence on TV and movies to the point of pure ridiculousness, but suddenly you get offended when something like this happens. If the lines of "normal" had not been blurred decades ago, something like this would not even be conceivable today. Nobody would DARE try this. But these days, anything goes to a point. So I am no longer surprised by what I see. Sickened, but not surprised. My girls will grow up understanding that there IS such a thing a right and wrong. And anyone who doesn't agree will not be allowed around my house.

I don't include anything like homosexuality or interracial relationships in my list of "wrong" behavior, so don't jump on me assuming I am racist or sexist. But there ARE things that should NOT be tolerated. And those things are nowhere near as offensive as killing animals for fun. My point is, if THOSE OTHER things had not been allowed to thrive up until now, things like this would be so far out in left field that nobody would dare try them.

Allow some pet owners to stomp on this woman until the is gone. Better yet, make it a pack of little girls so it takes longer.

My two pennies.

You're saying that tattoos were a slippery slope to animal abuse for kink purposes? :rollno: Europe has always been quite less prudish than America when it comes to public nudity, and they certainly haven't openly embraced stomping on cats.

Sorry dude, I like you and think you have some good insights into music and other things, but sometimes when you start engaging in armchair sociology, it leaves my face looking like this: :eyebrow:
 
It's a testament to humanity that we need and have []any[/i] laws.
We have laws to uphold the majority's standards of what is "right". On 90% of moral debates you will usually find a consensus on what is considered lawful.

It IS sad that, on the subject of crushing a practically helpless living being for entertainment, we don't have 100% of the population on board with making that a punishable offense.
 
Tis a sad commentary on society as we know it. If these individuals are capable of doing this to animals, what are they capable of doing to humans? And if our Judicial System can't see the crime here, they are just as guilty as the perpetrators and should be ashamed of themselves.

Steve

We have laws to uphold the majority's standards of what is "right". On 90% of moral debates you will usually find a consensus on what is considered lawful.

It IS sad that, on the subject of crushing a practically helpless living being for entertainment, we don't have 100% of the population on board with making that a punishable offense.
 

Latest posts