- May 16, 2007
- 3,395
- 4,869
- Disclosures
- Volunteer developer/beta tester with Source Audio, Morningstar Engineering & MORTRIX
Yes, Poly pitch shift has inherent latency.Hey, I'm sorry if these thing have been talked about before, but I couldn't find anything on google, and it's difficult to find specifics here too.
I have two questions regarding the C4.
Firstly, I found that the polyphonic pitch shift has a quite noticable latency. When I hammer on a note with my fretting hand, there is a very noticable delay between the direct pass through, and the shifted signal. With the monophonic shifter that's not a problem at all. I have seen demos of these two in videos before, and it didn't seem like there was much of a latency at all, so I fear I might be missing something with the polyphonic shifter.
Next up, I was wondering if there was a way to have one filter be controlled with only the envelope, and the second filter with only an LFO. I made a preset where you have a quacky filter 1, that is being controlled with the envelope 1. I was wondering if I could now make another voice with filter 2 active, that is controlled by only the LFO.
I know that there is balance control, which can control overall how much is done by the envelope and how much is being done by the LFO. But can this somehow be individually controlled for each voice?
No, there’s no way to have envelope only on one filter while having LFO only on the other as the LFO/envelope balance is unfortunately a global control.