• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SpaceX and other space stuff

I'm SHOCKED, I tell you!!
The article says "mysteriously blew into pieces," but I think it's a typo for "predictably." Honestly I assumed China or Elon would ruin low-Earth orbit for us all, but Boeing really is a dark horse with some giddyup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow
This is peer reviewed. From JPL and Cal Tech.
 
BOOM! They waived off the catch attempt, Super Heavy just completed its water landing and blew up on hitting the water.

Let's see how Spaceship fares on the re-entry attempt. They said they're going to be much more aggressive in terms of steeper descent flight profile than last time. Taking risks to find out where the edges are....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow
No granular detail yet, but the "offshore diversion" call for the booster yesterday was apparently due to an issue with something on the tower that didn't check out. From Ars Technica:

In an update posted to its website after the launch, SpaceX said automated health checks of hardware on the launch and catch tower triggered the aborted catch attempt. The company did not say what system failed the health check.

🚀 🍌
 
  • Like
Reactions: ahc and bholder
No granular detail yet, but the "offshore diversion" call for the booster yesterday was apparently due to an issue with something on the tower that didn't check out. From Ars Technica:

In an update posted to its website after the launch, SpaceX said automated health checks of hardware on the launch and catch tower triggered the aborted catch attempt. The company did not say what system failed the health check.

🚀 🍌
A commentard on the Ars Technica article mentioned that weather station gear on the tower got clobbered. Another commentard asked the first for a link to that info. I did not see a response. Now I suppose that makes me a metacommentard here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow
The article says "mysteriously blew into pieces," but I think it's a typo for "predictably." Honestly I assumed China or Elon would ruin low-Earth orbit for us all, but Boeing really is a dark horse with some giddyup.
A supposedly 'benign' ISP satellite 'mysteriously blew into pieces' . . . . well, a debris cloud is a GREAT place for a stealth satellite to hide. Just sayin . . . .
 
A supposedly 'benign' ISP satellite 'mysteriously blew into pieces' . . . . well, a debris cloud is a GREAT place for a stealth satellite to hide. Just sayin . . . .
Well, you could probably track that satellite back to when it was released to see how many satellites that particular launch deployed. Pretty darn sure a spy satellite is more robust/heavy than a Starlink satellite. I'm also not familiar enough with newer stealth coatings to know how they'd survive any sort of orbit, but I'd wager the stealth is more related to signals and maybe they paint it black or something. You honestly might have to hide in a cloud of debris, because there is no true stealth in space. I'm not talking "can be detected but not targeted," but true stealth. But, yay! Rockets!
 
For my fellow space / science enthusiasts... 😄👍


Xmas - Axial Tilt.jpg