I understand responses from non-musicians, but I can't tell you how many 'musicians' look at me cock-eyed when I mention Spector. 'Oh, you mean Schecter?!'

I get the same all the time also. Sad.
Yup. I usually just say "Yeah. That's what I meant...". Once they think it's a Schecter, it becomes less appealing for someone to try and make off with it.
Ok, it didn't look very aesthetic to me. Is that a necessary evil on a multi-scale instrument?
And is the nut brass or plastic?
Looks pretty awful to me. And is not necessary if the headstock is tilted on the bass. They are used on Fenders and those type of headstocks.
I don't know if it is necessary on a Multi-Scale.
Totally agree with you guys, that looks pretty awful. Definitely not necessary on a tilt back headstock and, if the designer is inventive and creative enough(i.e. Sheldon Dingwall), you can come up with something that eliminates the need for a string retainer AND still have a flat headstock.
It's hard to see at this angle, but...
On the Canadian Afterburners, the headstock is flat. In order to avoid having a string retainer, Sheldon came up with the idea to countersink the tuning machines so they sit lower.
It's a little easier to see in this pic;
I really prefer the look of a tilt back headstock. At this moment, my Forte 5 is the only bass I have that has a tilt back headstock.
Speaking of Forte 5's, I found an ancient pic of my original Forte 5, along with a Spalted Maple Euro 4 I had!
I can't remember if this was a NAMM show bass, but I do remember that I had to wait until after NAMM to get it. And it came in a gig bag.
Sorry for the long post, folks. This is my routine after gigs, come home, unwind on the interwebz, take a shower(so the wife doesn't kick me out of bed), pass out. I'm now at the "take a shower" stage...;-)