TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Is everyone still enjoying their retro 70 stingray that bought one? How is it now that you have spent some time playing it?
So I just got another Retro 70 tonight. The first one had some issues so I had to return it.
This one is heavy. 10.3 lbs!
But it doesn’t have the dead spots my first one had. Actually all the notes sustain very good. I am going to have to figure out how to use the micro tilt as the g string can only go as low as 6/64 and I usually like 5/64. Anyone know what size wrench to use for the tilt adjuster? Also for the bullet truss rods?
Tone wise this thing is more aggressive sounding than my Stingray Classic. The Classic is warmer and slightly fatter sounding when both are at 50% bass and 50% treble. Not sure which sound I like better, I am going to have to play it more to tell.
I have 30 days to decide if I want to keep it or not. If I keep it I will have to sell off some other basses I own. I want to make sure it worth it. Only time will tell.
Thanks I will try thatBullet Truss Nut: 1/8 inch.
Bridge Side Bolts: 1/8 inch.
Neck Tilt: 3/32 inch.
String Saddle Height Screws: 5/64 inch.
Grub screws on control knobs: Small blade screwdriver only.
Curious if they sound the sameI have a BFR Nitro '76 coming (great deal from Musician's Friend Open Box) so I'm interested to see how it stacks up against the retro 70s ray I just got. I'll probably only keep one of them.
So after playing it more I definitely noticed a big difference in tone compared to my other Stingrays. The Retro is more thicker, richer and fuller sounding. Aggressive as well. The E string especially. The notes feel like they project straight at you and hit you in the chest. My other stingrays seem more open sounding. The notes sound like they project outward and fill the room in comparison if that makes sense.
Not sure if one it better then the other but they are different.
No way it will get buried in the mix. I agreeYes, that's a good observation. Mine has an instantaneous, sharp attack and is very percussive. I really like that in a bass and Stingrays (especially this one!) do that very well. Ghost/muted notes just jump right out. And since I do a lot of that in my playing, it works well for me.
I'll have a chance to play it in a live group setting tomorrow. I'm 100% confident it will NOT be buried in the mix and will compliment the overall sound of the music with it's defined, warm tone.
Ok, I just recently bought a Classic. Is the Retro different enough? What do you think?So after spending the weekend playing and comparing the Retro to my other stingrays this one is definitely a keeper. It just has a sound that my other Stingrays can't do no matter how I EQ them. The Classic can come extremely close, but the Retro has this extra amount of richness and punch that the Classic doesn't have.
Maybe it has to do with the weight, 10.3 lbs I don't know.
As for the weight I was turned off at first but now I am actually really liking the weight. It balances so well that it really doesn't feel that heavy at all with a good strap. It makes me feel like I am playing a vintage bass.
The sustain on this retro is also very good. No dead spots that I could find and trust me I tried to find them after the first retro I bought had a very bad E string A note.
So now the hard decision. I need to get rid of a few basses to cover the cost, but I think it will be worth it.
Probably going to sell my P bass and old three band stingray as I play them the least.
I will post some pics later when I have more time.
the Retro has this extra amount of richness and punch that the Classic doesn't have.
Maybe it has to do with the weight, 10.3 lbs I don't know.
This. The old two-bands don't have that ping either, ime.Are these dead spots perhaps the nature of this beast? I’m just asking because I’ve never played one but maybe this is why changes were made to this design?
I’ve heard people complain about StingRays having a weak G string. Maybe this is what they were referring to.
https://www.talkbass.com/threads/do-stingrays-have-the-infamous-dead-spot.1507579/
As for that “ metallic high pitch ring”…. that is exactly what I don’t like about certain era of StingRay basses. The Old Smoothie, Specials, and passive Short Scales don’t have what I call that “ metallic ping”. Ernie Ball Slinky ( Cobalt) Flats might help tame that metallic ring and still give you punch and sustain.
They are very close in sound. The Retro is a tad more bright, rich and punchy sounding.Ok, I just recently bought a Classic. Is the Retro different enough? What do you think?
So after spending the weekend playing and comparing the Retro to my other stingrays this one is definitely a keeper. It just has a sound that my other Stingrays can't do no matter how I EQ them. The Classic can come extremely close, but the Retro has this extra amount of richness and punch that the Classic doesn't have.
both black and white are nice. I choose black.That's great, happy that you've found a keeper.
I got a message today from the store where I purchased, and returned 'my' white (10.2) Retro , to notify me that they have a black one in stock that weights 8.95..
I really want a white one, but am considering now to go for black.
Unfortunately as the store is across borders, there's no way I can test-drive the bass for dead-spots.
I guess mine was the worst in regards with dead-spots, and it would be really bad luck if I would run into the same issues, right?
Decisions..I'll have to change my avatar too![]()
both black and white are nice. I choose black.
I would give it another try. You can always return it again.